Philosophy Now Forum

attofishpi wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote:You can't cover your ignorance with insults, but it might make you feel good.
Why not read the fucking article- you might learn something.

I don't know where you get this shit from:" You are basically stating that for every frequency of sound, humans have a 'sense'"

You are the only poster on this entire forum that I have no respect for, piss off.

Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm here to stay. If you don't like it, tough.

attofishpi wrote:

sthitapragya wrote:

attofishpi wrote: You want more speculation from me? I always attempt to answer based on my current experience\knowledge of this 'God' entity, but you are pushing buttons that don't (yet) exist around these parts.

Isn't it all speculation so far?

Note the words 'experience and knowledge of..'

I stated earlier regarding the soul and direct communication from a sage with respect to that.

I ignored that thinking you might be kidding.

I'm guessing that we are ALL naturally part of the greater connected awareness beyond being individual humans. And there are varying degrees (and fantasies) associated with our access to that awareness. The identities or roles people assign/create in relation to that greater connected awareness (such as prophets, sages, gods, sacred texts, and divine messages), are surely greatly influenced by each individual's (and culture's) OWN human state and frailties and needs, which is why there have been so many different interpretations and imaginings by so many people throughout our history. While we might think our individual interpretation is most accurate and true (at least for ourselves) amongst others, can we remain aware of the intoxication we can have with our own imaginings/creations/assignments which we might come to worship above all else, and to prefer more than greater truths?