Page 9 of 10
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 4:31 pm
by sthitapragya
bobevenson wrote:Why don't you try addressing my concrete question instead of asking me your hypothetical ones?
How is it hypothetical? It is a root question. You say you are a prophet. I ask you, why does God need a prophet to give important messages to people when He can very easily do it himself? You have to agree that there is a chance that people might not accept you as a prophet as you can see is happening right now. So the end result is that God's message is not being well received by people.
If you can explain why God needs a prophet for giving messages he could very easily give himself, you will open the door to the possibility that you are prophet.
Also, my question is more important because you are the one who needs to sell himself. You want me to accept you as a prophet. Since I don't, you need to sell me the theory so that I buy it. I am asking you a question. If you dont want to answer, you may not. But that just means I will reject your claim that you are a prophet. Then I will not hear God's message coming from you. So you will fail in a mission God has given you. Do you want that?
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 5:45 pm
by bobevenson
sthitapragya wrote: bobevenson wrote:Why don't you try addressing my concrete question instead of asking me your hypothetical ones?
Can you explain why God needs a prophet?
"Why does God need a prophet?" is hypothetical in the sense of being theoretical or speculative. I'm asking you to address my concrete credentials.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 5:48 pm
by sthitapragya
bobevenson wrote:sthitapragya wrote: bobevenson wrote:Why don't you try addressing my concrete question instead of asking me your hypothetical ones?
Can you explain why God needs a prophet?
"Why does God need a prophet?" is hypothetical in the sense of being theoretical or speculative. I'm asking you to address my concrete credentials.
Now you are evading the question. Well, that is your choice. I just wont believe you are a prophet. Too bad. I was a potential client you lost.
ANd there is nothing hypothetical about my question. god would have a prophet only if he needed one. I don't see why God would need a prophet. So all prophets are false. If you can show God needs a prophet then you open the door to the possibility of prophets. Till then, prophets are a myth because God does not need one.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 6:56 pm
by bobevenson
sthitapragya wrote:I just wont believe you are a prophet. Too bad. I was a potential client you lost.
First of all, I want to say clearly and with no ambiguity, you're one lying son-of-a-bitch and you are quite aware of it, so please don't bother to deny it. Secondly, you don't even have the balls to challenge my submitted credentials.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 7:03 pm
by sthitapragya
bobevenson wrote:sthitapragya wrote:I just wont believe you are a prophet. Too bad. I was a potential client you lost.
First of all, I want to say clearly and with no ambiguity, you're one lying son-of-a-bitch and you are quite aware of it, so please don't bother to deny it. Secondly, you don't even have the balls to challenge my submitted credentials.
Now, Now. No need to get all het up. Everyone gets frustrated once in a while. And this is no way to treat a prospective client. Remember you are doing God's work. And your message is not getting across. So again, why does God need a prophet? Explain that and I will accept that you are a prophet. Then I will read your Ozzy prophecy.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 7:15 pm
by bobevenson
sthitapragya wrote:bobevenson wrote:sthitapragya wrote:I just wont believe you are a prophet. Too bad. I was a potential client you lost.
First of all, I want to say clearly and with no ambiguity, you're one lying son-of-a-bitch and you are quite aware of it, so please don't bother to deny it. Secondly, you don't even have the balls to challenge my submitted credentials.
This is no way to treat a prospective client.
Perhaps lying-son-of-a-bitch genes run in your family, that's the only explanation I can come up with, for you to continue the same lie after being called on it.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 7:38 pm
by Arising_uk
sthitapragya wrote:... So you will fail in a mission God has given you. Do you want that?
Actually, yes he does as he is the Anti-Baptist, False Prophet for Satan and the Beast. The only consideration is whether he is a duplicitous or a dupe, I used to think the latter but now think the former.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:51 pm
by bobevenson
Please, just tell me how anybody but a divinely guided prophet could possibly discover in 20 minutes what the rest of the world couldn't discover in 170 years, namely, the origin of Cincinnati's Queen City name linking Cincinnati with Babylon and ancient Rome in the book of Revelation.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:29 pm
by Obvious Leo
bobevenson wrote:Please, just tell me how anybody but a divinely guided prophet could possibly discover in 20 minutes what the rest of the world couldn't discover in 170 years, namely, the origin of Cincinnati's Queen City name linking Cincinnati with Babylon and ancient Rome in the book of Revelation.
Let me guess. It was written on a fortune cookie.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:39 pm
by bobevenson
Obvious Leo wrote:bobevenson wrote:Please, just tell me how anybody but a divinely guided prophet could possibly discover in 20 minutes what the rest of the world couldn't discover in 170 years, namely, the origin of Cincinnati's Queen City name linking Cincinnati with Babylon and ancient Rome in the book of Revelation.
Let me guess. It was written on a fortune cookie.
You refuse to take an inexplicable mystical event seriously, and yet expect me to take your idiocy seriously.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:45 pm
by Obvious Leo
bobevenson wrote:You refuse to take an inexplicable mystical event seriously,
When you sup with the devil, Bob, be sure to bring a long spoon. I saw Billy Connolly in my toast, remember, so I take mystical events very seriously indeed and go easy on the booze accordingly.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2015 11:35 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
I saw this on FB the other day.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater
Obviously god wants us all the instigate a socialist revolution!!
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:12 am
by Obvious Leo
Praise the lord and go tell it on the mountain, brother, because yea verily we have the sign.
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:17 am
by Briancrc
attofishpi wrote:The symbolism and metaphor if you want to call it that, came after i was made aware of its existence. I viewed the world from a different angle and saw anomalies that were too remote to be mere coincidence (in my opinion).
It's like there were events whose probability of occurrence were too great to seem like chance would be a reasonable explanation? If I'm understanding you correctly, what is an example?
Re: Evidence of God.
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2015 4:02 am
by sthitapragya
bobevenson wrote:
Perhaps lying-son-of-a-bitch genes run in your family, that's the only explanation I can come up with, for you to continue the same lie after being called on it.
How can a question be a lie? And you still have not explained why God needs a prophet. Also now I have an add on question. Why does a divinely inspired prophet lose it so easily?