"Lacking".
Once again no substantive replies to my questions or any of the points I raise.
How would you know this Mr Philosopher?
I've told you, unlike you, I don't consider myself as such nor do I think myself an academic, just educable.
I said you had no graduate qualification and I know this because I have one or two, because of your lies about yourself in your introduction and because you do not say what you graduate qualification is. Tell me this and let's see if you can have the ring of truth.
My erudition is clearly greater than yours and you claim to have an Hons degree.
Not claim, have.
By comparison I should have a doctorate .
You said you did?
I know more about philosophy than you and I don't even have a qualification in the subject.
Then answer my questions.
No one here has called your work outstanding ...
You're right! I only got a 2:1.
Is that why you're here? To get a pat on the head from the likes of Bill?
and as far as I can see and
where is your contribution to philosophy here ?
Demonstrating that those who cannot answer simple questions no not of what they talk about.
Not one genuine original post and in fact where are your posts except your back biting
excursions into the posts of other forum members for years.
Looks like they all got deleted as the mods wiped everything except the past couple of years. But even back when I first joined I rarely initiated a post as once you've done a degree in the subject you realise that you have little to say thats not been said. If I ever do get a genuinely reasonably original idea then I'll be taking a Phd thanks.
Your standard of writing is poor and semi literate.
Nah! It's not, it's natural. As I'm not writing propaganda nor channelling another's ideas for my self-aggrandizement.
And is it not curious that you claim to have a degree from a college which no longer exists?
Only if you wish to impute something nefarious to my motives and cast doubt upon my character, which you obviously do. But since the Polytechnic system was replaced I find myself in the same position as thousands of others. Good job I've still got the bit of paper isn't it.
Still, not as curious as someone claiming to be a DPhil from Oxford, sorry Cambridge, no Oxford.
And you talk about my psychology of bitterness when the most bitter manifestation here is
The Chicken. The bile is enough to blot out the sun.
You are angry because you are unemployed and live in a bed-sit and are an abject failure in life. You have no qualifications and so you occupy this virtual world where your virtual qualifications can go unchallenged ,so you think.
At 53 I've experienced most of what you say at one time or the other, except for the bit about virtual qualifications as having those bits of paper took hard-work and sacrifice ironically leading to some of the above but I sleep soundly knowing it was worth it just to annoy such as you. Your words are why I think you a troll, an academic failure at the graduate level and a young bourgeois twat to boot.
You inability to understand Schopenhauer' s synthesis of philosophy exposed you as a charlatan .
Not really, it just shows that after twenty five odd years you forget stuff. Especially when it was a small section of the course as back then no-one took the Continentals that seriously in philosophy, academically that is.
Your cross examinations of Bill Wiltrack are plainly childish in their grammatical construction and import. Your puerile argument, than the man has not engaged with his minimalist world view, is not so much absurd as a concept (although it is silly) but it is the absurd gravity which you attach to it.
Not really, as I think that those who proclaim a 'philosophy' should live by it.
This is how children conduct arguments not adults with degrees in philosophy.
How would you know? As you admit to no such status.
Experience has shown that Bill has no intention of allowing reason to enter his thoughts just as you have no intention of assisting him to think about what he says. You're just on this bandwagon to promote your 'power play' upon this forum to satisfy your own grandiosity. Me, I just oppose what he says upon principle as I have no wish to see such guff promoted as philosophy. Now you can once again say 'But Schopenhauer did this!' and all I can say is that he didn't promote anti-reason as he'd not have postulated his FPSR.
It would not be so bad if your attacks were funny but they are menacing
in nature. You just come across as a bitter drop out from society who garners power
by wading into people on a forum.
You are an idiot as there is no power in such a sense. Although you obviously think so, hence your attacks upon me. When it comes to menacing I think your past PM's to other members fit the bill.
What a complete waste of space you are to the community.
Nice try but your psycho-babble is wasted upon me and I'll leave it to the community to put me upon ignore if they wish. Although I can't remember the last time I was banned but think you have that honour in spades.
