Re: Hi. Wow...
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 5:19 pm
you will...
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
To not agree with you homegrown, is, for the last time, not a fuckings crime! It doesn't make me less open minded. I simply see things you choose to ignore, and therefore, however many times I read the same shit which you write over and over again like some kind of maniac it doesn't make me agree with you more because each time the same problems don't just disappear because you try to cover them in a mountain of repetition.homegrown wrote:You close your mind at such an age - you'll never become a philosopher!
You are forgetting that your entire perception of the state of humankind is wrong! Humankind has lots of problems to deal with, but they are problems it can solve on its current course. Unless you want to tell me why people need a world government to make a solar panel or manufacture liquid hydrogen fuel, things which it is already perfectly capable of doing on its own ^^homegrown wrote:Try wrap your head around this. In evolution - either the organism is correct to reality else rendered extinct. If humankind doesn't accept that acting on the basis of valid knowledge is necessary, we will suffer and die out. And we should - because we are wrong. Were there a God in Heaven, I could not in good conscience plead that we should be excused from the cause and effect dynamics of evolution, that by countless extinctions have moulded us from a mountain of disregarded designs. All that's necessary to cosmic justice is that the information is available, and I cannot say it more clearly than this: accept a scientific understanding of reality in common, and on the basis of what's true - do what's necessary to survive. If you can't understand that then there's something profoundly wrong with you - and sorry, but you've got to go.
who is the most childish here? Me or the guy who is starting to wage war on my persona?homegrown wrote:child: waah!
okay then, in your mature opinion, comment upon:
In evolution - either the organism is correct to reality else rendered extinct.
And you choose the way you answer questions. And I have to ask you to consider how mature it is to answer with "me memememememememememem! Egositic child!"homegrown wrote:hey dude - you asked 'what category of person does that make me memememememememememem! Egositic child!
My positions seems to be: we should try to survive, and we should try together. But your solutions to the problem, for instance your desire to treat human beings as that their identities does not matter, or their opinions does not matter, is morally wrong. If you want to simply (and ignore some aspects of) our disagreement, then that's basically our disagreement in a nutshell.homegrown wrote:just when i thought we were talking -
Your position seems to be that - there's a survival advantage to acting upon valid knowledge, but it's not necessary. Is that fair?
In the heat of battle, it's hard to think and choose weapons effectively, I see that it is not you, but rather that which you have bought into, due to differentiated knowledge. Which ultimately, is what each of you are trying to reach, within the other.The Voice of Time wrote:who is the most childish here? Me or the guy who is starting to wage war on my persona?
To be truly effective, you should rid yourself of this type of weapon, especially as the only means in any particular volley, as it achieves the opposite of your intent.homegrown wrote:hey dude - you asked 'what category of person does that make me memememememememememem! Egositic child!
please explain, I did not understand that.SpheresOfBalance wrote:but rather that which you have bought into, due to differentiated knowledge.