Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 9:47 am I am, still, waiting for you to define a word, here, as well.

So, this means that 'we' are both waiting, here.

Did you not see? The thread is called "Questions to Age" not "Questions to Magnus". Magnus has no obligation to answer any questions -- even though he did.

So don't distract and answer the question.

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:06 am Now, imagine coming into a forum, claiming that the forum is reduced to 'some thing', and then doing the 'very thing' that you just said that the forum is 'reduced to'.

Sounds like Age to me.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:10 am I love Harbal, why, because he touched me with his ten foot bargepole.

The experience was Lovely. It was pure bliss Love actualised. In that moment when he touched me, I disappeared. I was totally gone.

There was no more me or him, just total unity and Love. It’s the one experience I will never forget, it was the first and last Love. And that was enough. Once is always enough for me.

Once is eternal infinite Love. Love showed me the way to Love. I’m home with the beloved always. There is only Love, one without a second.

Actually he begged me for it long before you. You were last on his list of choices after everyone else soundly rejected him

You were the only one stupid and desperate enough to oblige him.

To love God is our greatest obligation.

Never be a beggar in your own kingdom.

Is that supposed to mean something? Harbal did mention that he didn't want to be seen with you in public which is why he dumped your flabby arse.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:13 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 9:47 am I am, still, waiting for you to define a word, here, as well.

So, this means that 'we' are both waiting, here.

Did you not see? The thread is called "Questions to Age" not "Questions to Magnus".

Once again 'you' have failed, absolutely miserably, to comprehend and understand what 'I' have said and written, here.

'I' did not start 'this thread' so 'I' have absolutely no obligation, at all, to answer absolutely any thing.

And, especially more so when people like you introduce completely out of context, and/or not yet clarified, questions.

Did you, really, not comprehend and understand 'this fact', last time I presented 'it', here?

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:13 am Magnus has no obligation to answer any questions -- even though he did.

Did you?

If yes, then what question was 'that', exactly?

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:13 am So don't distract and answer the question.

LOL
LOL
LOL

If 'this one' really thinks or believes that 'I' am going to do absolutely any thing just because 'it' told me to do some thing, then the 'only one' this one is fooling and deceiving, here, is "its" own 'self'.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:14 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:06 am Now, imagine coming into a forum, claiming that the forum is reduced to 'some thing', and then doing the 'very thing' that you just said that the forum is 'reduced to'.

Sounds like Age to me.

Yet, is has never been 'me' who has said nor claimed any thing like 'this'.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:17 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:10 am I love Harbal, why, because he touched me with his ten foot bargepole.

The experience was Lovely. It was pure bliss Love actualised. In that moment when he touched me, I disappeared. I was totally gone.

There was no more me or him, just total unity and Love. It’s the one experience I will never forget, it was the first and last Love. And that was enough. Once is always enough for me.

Once is eternal infinite Love. Love showed me the way to Love. I’m home with the beloved always. There is only Love, one without a second.

Actually he begged me for it long before you. You were last on his list of choices after everyone else soundly rejected him

You were the only one stupid and desperate enough to oblige him.

LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL

Talk about presenting the primest of examples of the one who is absolutely jealous, here.

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:27 am And, especially more so when people like you introduce completely out of context, and/or not yet clarified, questions.

Do you realize that most people don't have trouble answering my question?

It's a very simple question.

Yet, you make it out to be far more complicated than it actually is.

So how can one not conclude that you're being evasive?

Perhaps you should try not to blame others for a change. Perhaps you should consider the possibility that it is you who is at fault here.

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:28 am Yet, is has never been 'me' who has said nor claimed any thing like 'this'.

How do you know?

You being convinced is no proof.

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:29 am LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL

The pinnacle of maturity.

The acronym "LOL" repeated six times in a row.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:21 am Is that supposed to mean something? Harbal did mention that he didn't want to be seen with you in public which is why he dumped your flabby arse.

Do 'you' expect 'us' to believe that 'you' were speaking to "harbal" after 'the encounter', in which 'you', once again, brought up, and in to another thread, and which you, again, appear to want to be, a 'batty bore 'trying to' out-batter another, here, with battiness, once more?

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:27 am If 'this one' really thinks or believes that 'I' am going to do absolutely any thing just because 'it' told me to do some thing, then the 'only one' this one is fooling and deceiving, here, is "its" own 'self'.

You don't have to do anything. Feel free to be anything you want. But then, don't claim you're capable of answering questions. You very clearly are not. And that is probably why people don't like interacting with you. You lack the basic skills of communication.

I can believe he didn’t want to be seen with me in public, no problem.

But only I know the truth as to whether he wanted to be seen with me under the sheets. I know with absolute certainty that he definitely wanted to be seen with me under the sheet’s because it was the only place where we experienced the real fire that burnt us both to ash. It was like fire and fire. Indistinguishable. We couldn’t get enough of this fire. We both admitted that we’d never felt that sort of fire before. It was that hot, it totally consumed itself. It had to eventually short circuit. Boom!

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:31 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:27 am And, especially more so when people like you introduce completely out of context, and/or not yet clarified, questions.

Do you realize that most people don't have trouble answering my question?

Yet, when I challenge you to answer it, you never did.

So, why do you have trouble answering your own question, here?

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:31 am It's a very simple question.

Yet, you make it out to be far more complicated than it actually is.

So how can one not conclude that you're being evasive?

But, you are absolutely free to 'conclude' absolutely any thing at all, here.

After all, getting you people to show and reveal 'some of the things', which 'you conclude', absolutely freely, and without any clarity nor clarification sought out, was some thing 'I' set out to achieve, here.

And, for the reasons that I have already expressed.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:31 am Perhaps you should try not to blame others for a change. Perhaps you should consider the possibility that it is you who is at fault here.

LOL 'At fault', in relation to 'what', exactly?