Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 5:02 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 4:51 pm
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 4:42 pm
So you used to be a woman, but now you're not. So you're... trans?
We need send somebody round to measure his/her moustache before a final verdict can be rendered.
Nah, we’re just on different valve lengths when it comes to understanding lexicon differences.
Trump is simple minded, like me. I prefer simplicity, it’s my vibe.
I like how Trump answers difficult complex questions with pure child like simplicity.
You aren't keeping it simple, you are just pig-headed in the face of your own failure. Keeping it simple is what US SC Justice Potter Stuart did in a
famous obscenity trial in the 60s where he wrote:
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.
You cold easily have adopted a similar approach, it just comes at the cost of not being in a position to tell other people they are wrong.
Instead, you have blundered around like a blind walrus, first basing your "definition" on a function that the object in question can perform (birthing and suckling). When that let you down, you moved onto a component bodily organ (stupidly choosing one that you yourself no longer possess because you are an absolute self-basting fuckwit).
If you were either smart, or if you had the ability to actually keep things simple, you would realise you were in over your head ages ago and would either conclude that you had failed in the task of definition becasue you are such a simple creature, or that you had failed because it might be a more difficult task than you originally supposed.