Virgin Weddings???

[Age]

I see. So they can flick the bean, maybe a little light scissoring with a girlfriend at weekends. But no dick. Glad we could clear that up.

Leave it to your mind to take short-cuts and deceive...does that sound like Chastity? No, obviously not.

Are 'they' ALLOWED to have 'sexual thoughts', TO you?

Or, does 'this' DISMISS them from 'getting married' AS WELL?

LOL Have you HEARD of the words 'human nature' BEFORE?

Either way, INFORM the readers of HOW you human beings can go AGAINST 'human nature', exactly?

Therefore you've missed the point entirely, congratulations!

What is THE POINT, here, EXACTLY?

That you BELIEVE that if you had A "daughter", then you SHOULD HAVE 'THE RIGHT' to MAKE SURE that "she" REMAINS A "virgin", and does NOT MASTURBATE, UNTIL ONLY you APPROVE, ABSOLUTELY and FULLY, of 'who' "she" 'marries'?

The MORE you SPEAK and WRITE, here, the MORE DEGENERATE you ARE APPEARING TO BE.

[FlashDangerpants]

But I am glad I could help you work through your prudishness. Do we need to work out what sort of butt stuff is allowed?

No thanks, I'm good...

Ah I see. You maintain your lady friend's virginity by having her peg you with a strap on. That way her hymen is so protected it's practically getting reinforced.

[Wizard22]

I see. So they can flick the bean, maybe a little light scissoring with a girlfriend at weekends. But no dick. Glad we could clear that up.

Leave it to your mind to take short-cuts and deceive...does that sound like Chastity? No, obviously not.

Are 'they' ALLOWED to have 'sexual thoughts', TO you?

Or, does 'this' DISMISS them from 'getting married' AS WELL?

LOL Have you HEARD of the words 'human nature' BEFORE?

Either way, INFORM the readers of HOW you human beings can go AGAINST 'human nature', exactly?

Therefore you've missed the point entirely, congratulations!

What is THE POINT, here, EXACTLY?

That you BELIEVE that if you had A "daughter", then you SHOULD HAVE 'THE RIGHT' to MAKE SURE that "she" REMAINS A "virgin", and does NOT MASTURBATE, UNTIL ONLY you APPROVE, ABSOLUTELY and FULLY, of 'who' "she" 'marries'?

The MORE you SPEAK and WRITE, here, the MORE DEGENERATE you ARE APPEARING TO BE.

AgeGPT, it's a little rude to impede upon other's conversation and argument when you're so overbearing. Cool it!

Work on finishing your own arguments first.

[Age]

Although they probably apply equally to both of these freaks.

Why do you hate the idea that your father would have or should have looked out for your best interests, when you were a young, horny 14-year-old, Veg?

Talk about PRODUCING ANOTHER PRIME example of LETTING one's OWN ASSUMPTION GET IN 'the WAY' and INTERFERE WITH things, here.

Did you fuck up, make mistakes? Did you get taken advantage of? And from thence on, you hated your father ever since?

It is like you WANT TO HAVE A "daughter" so that you can CHECK INTO "her" vagina, TO MAKE SURE "she" DOES EXACTLY what you WANT "her" TO DO.

AND, WORSE STILL you are 'TRYING TO' "justify" 'this behavior' by CLAIMING that if you DO NOT, then you would be A "bad father".

Am I warm, cold, hot, off the mark?? What's with your vengefulness against men?

It is VERY UNLIKELY that "vegetariantaxidermy" NOR "accelafine" WILL SPELL OUT WHY they HATE "men". But, what is with your WANTING FULL CONTROL OVER "females", "wizard22"?

What happened in 'your past' that has let you to being SO DISTORTED and TWISTED, here?

[Age]

Oh wow... you mean nothing south of the equator at all? Not even a cheeky ring of the Devil's Doorbell?

I guess it's all got to be up top then. Soapy titwanks for all.

[img]

Leave it to Liberals to fine-tune-focus on what can be gotten away with? Instead of what could be achieved??

LOL What do you even ENVISION COULD BE ACHIEVED, here?

That parents will let the "daughters" be INSPECTED, BEFORE 'marriage'?

Or, is 'it' something else, here?

[Wizard22]

It is like you WANT TO HAVE A "daughter" so that you can CHECK INTO "her" vagina, TO MAKE SURE "she" DOES EXACTLY what you WANT "her" TO DO.

AND, WORSE STILL you are 'TRYING TO' "justify" 'this behavior' by CLAIMING that if you DO NOT, then you would be A "bad father".

Correct...if you don't want the best for your children (this includes their mates), then you are a bad father/mother/parent.

This SHOULD BE common sense, but it's 2025. And I'm arguing against an AgeGPT program, so there's that too...

[Age]

But I HAVE NEVER MADE an 'ad hom', here.

AGAIN, you could NOT be MORE BLIND and STUPID, here.

Ummm, you kinda did, here, AgeGPT...

LOL I EVEN INFORMED 'this one' that it would be BEST if they SOUGHT OUT and OBTAINED ACTUAL CLARIFICATION, BEFORE they MAKE ABSOLUTELY ANY ASSUMPTIONS AT ALL.

LOL 'me' SAYING that 'you' are BLIND and/or STUPID is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING LIKE what you ACTUALLY ASSUME, and BELIEVE.

What 'it' MEANS, and IS REFERRING TO, is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING LIKE what you PRESUME, and BELIEVE, here.

So, ONCE MORE, this one, literally, could NOT BE MORE BLIND, and STUPID, here, AGAIN.

[Wizard22]

But I HAVE NEVER MADE an 'ad hom', here.

AGAIN, you could NOT be MORE BLIND and STUPID, here.

Ummm, you kinda did, here, AgeGPT...

LOL I EVEN INFORMED 'this one' that it would be BEST if they SOUGHT OUT and OBTAINED ACTUAL CLARIFICATION, BEFORE they MAKE ABSOLUTELY ANY ASSUMPTIONS AT ALL.

LOL 'me' SAYING that 'you' are BLIND and/or STUPID is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING LIKE what you ACTUALLY ASSUME, and BELIEVE.

What 'it' MEANS, and IS REFERRING TO, is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING LIKE what you PRESUME, and BELIEVE, here.

So, ONCE MORE, this one, literally, could NOT BE MORE BLIND, and STUPID, here, AGAIN.

Following up Ad Hom with the same Ad Hom...bold move, AgeGPT.

If I call you a moron 100 times, does it make it more effect another 1000 times?

[Age]

If "vegetariantaxidermy" had a "father" who LOOKED INTO her vagina, or LET ANOTHER one, to see if "she" was a virgin or not, then I think "vegetariantaxidermy", "accelfine", and a great deal of MANY other human beings would say that "that father" was NOT a 'good father' AT ALL.

But, if 'you' want to go DELVING INTO "your daughter's" vagina/s, to CHECK that 'they' were virgins, and you WANT TO BELIEVE that by you DOING SO makes you a so-called "good father", then by ALL MEANS KEEP BELIEVING 'this'.

I, however, think you WILL FIND NOT MANY AT ALL agreeing WITH you, here.

You're wrong, AgeGPT.

Any and every reasonable father doesn't want his biological daughter being sexually harassed, assaulted, or abused.

I NEVER EVER SAID ABSOLUTELY ANY thing TO THE CONTRARY. So, LOL HOW COULD 'I' BE WRONG, here?

you REALLY can NOT STOP MAKING UP ASSUMPTIONS, and JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, here, can you?

you, ALSO, REALLY can NOT JUST SEEK OUT CLARIFICATION, FIRST, can you?

That would also fall under "checking your daughter's Hymen / Sexual Innocence / Wellbeing".

SO THAT ALL of the readers, here, BECOME FULLY AWARE, "wizard22" ACTUALLY BELIEVES that ANY and EVERY so-called "reasonable father" CHECKS "their daughters" hymen.

They're one-and-the-same. What societies really, really need to be worried about...are fathers who don't even care or are simply absent in the first place.

You know...Secular Society???

So, are 'we' ALLOWED TO GO TO ANY 'church' and/or FOLLOW ANY 'religion'?

Or, do you have A LIST of 'the ones' that 'we' ALL SHOULD GO TO, and STAY AWAY FROM, AS WELL?

[Age]

Leave it to your mind to take short-cuts and deceive...does that sound like Chastity? No, obviously not.

Are 'they' ALLOWED to have 'sexual thoughts', TO you?

Or, does 'this' DISMISS them from 'getting married' AS WELL?

LOL Have you HEARD of the words 'human nature' BEFORE?

Either way, INFORM the readers of HOW you human beings can go AGAINST 'human nature', exactly?

Therefore you've missed the point entirely, congratulations!

What is THE POINT, here, EXACTLY?

That you BELIEVE that if you had A "daughter", then you SHOULD HAVE 'THE RIGHT' to MAKE SURE that "she" REMAINS A "virgin", and does NOT MASTURBATE, UNTIL ONLY you APPROVE, ABSOLUTELY and FULLY, of 'who' "she" 'marries'?

The MORE you SPEAK and WRITE, here, the MORE DEGENERATE you ARE APPEARING TO BE.

AgeGPT, it's a little rude to impede upon other's conversation and argument when you're so overbearing. Cool it!

LOL A so-claimed 'little rude' TO WHO, EXACTLY?

LOL Were you NOT YET AWARE that 'you' are IN A PUBLIC FORUM, here?

Work on finishing your own arguments first.

LOL What is 'it' that you even think or BELIEVE I am 'arguing' FOR, exactly?

'These posters', here, commonly BELIEVED that if one just CHALLENGES and/or just QUESTIONS, their views or positions, then that one is ARGUING FOR some thing.

LOL 'These one' MISSED, and MISUNDERSTOOD, SO, SO MUCH, here.

[Age]

It is like you WANT TO HAVE A "daughter" so that you can CHECK INTO "her" vagina, TO MAKE SURE "she" DOES EXACTLY what you WANT "her" TO DO.

AND, WORSE STILL you are 'TRYING TO' "justify" 'this behavior' by CLAIMING that if you DO NOT, then you would be A "bad father".

Correct...if you don't want the best for your children (this includes their mates), then you are a bad father/mother/parent.

So, you JUST ADMITTED that you REALLY DO WANT TO CHECK, and DELVE, INTO "your daughters" vagina AND sex life.

Are you EVEN AWARE that is VERY, VERY Wrong in just about EVERY society, if NOT ALL?

This SHOULD BE common sense, but it's 2025.

If you SAY and BELIEVE SO. But, I think it WILL BE DISCOVERED that it is NOT COMMON that "fathers" WANT TO CHECK INTO "their daughters" vaginas.

And I'm arguing against an AgeGPT program, so there's that too...

Are you, STILL, 'trying to' HOLD ONTO 'THIS BELIEF' of yours, here?

Also, what is this, supposed, and so-called, 'AgeGPT program' ACTUALLY SAYING, which you are 'arguing AGAINST', EXACTLY?

[Age]

Ummm, you kinda did, here, AgeGPT...

LOL I EVEN INFORMED 'this one' that it would be BEST if they SOUGHT OUT and OBTAINED ACTUAL CLARIFICATION, BEFORE they MAKE ABSOLUTELY ANY ASSUMPTIONS AT ALL.

LOL 'me' SAYING that 'you' are BLIND and/or STUPID is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING LIKE what you ACTUALLY ASSUME, and BELIEVE.

What 'it' MEANS, and IS REFERRING TO, is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING LIKE what you PRESUME, and BELIEVE, here.

So, ONCE MORE, this one, literally, could NOT BE MORE BLIND, and STUPID, here, AGAIN.

Following up Ad Hom with the same Ad Hom...bold move, AgeGPT.

ONCE MORE FOR THE Truly BLIND, AND STUPID, 'it' is NOT an 'ad hom' AT ALL.

If I call you a moron 100 times, does it make it more effect another 1000 times?

If 'you' called 'me' A MORON, then 'I' would just ask 'you', 'What is A 'moron', to you, "wizard22", EXACTLY?

I WOULD then JUST WAIT to SEE HOW you would ACTUALLY RESPOND.

you REALLY are MISSING, and MISUNDERSTANDING, SO, SO MUCH, here.

[accelafine]

It is like you WANT TO HAVE A "daughter" so that you can CHECK INTO "her" vagina, TO MAKE SURE "she" DOES EXACTLY what you WANT "her" TO DO.

AND, WORSE STILL you are 'TRYING TO' "justify" 'this behavior' by CLAIMING that if you DO NOT, then you would be A "bad father".

Correct...if you don't want the best for your children (this includes their mates), then you are a bad father/mother/parent.

This SHOULD BE common sense, but it's 2025. And I'm arguing against an AgeGPT program, so there's that too...

I'm so glad you are ok with your daughters taking it up the arse, as flasher pointed out. Leaves their hymens intact for your inspection

[Wizard22]

Ok...

So to AgeGPT, calling others "BLIND AND STUPID" is not an Ad Hom fallacy.

And to Veg, I'm, all-of-a-sudden, tolerant of Sodomy...

Literal wut?!

[FlashDangerpants]

A special song for Gandalf the KKK

God's Loophole - Garfunkel and Oates
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8ZF_R_j0OY