Page 8 of 28
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:15 pm
by Walker
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:08 am
Walker wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 1:33 am
Walker wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2024 11:03 pm
This must be CGI. The head is way too big.
I think you might be right. I thought it looked a bit strange
Check out that necktie. It looks like something out of Max Headroom's old closet.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:21 pm
by Walker
commonsense wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:52 pm
Look closely and you’ll see a broad band of baldness thinly covered by the combover.
If you can’t see it you must be Walker.
His barber is an architect. An artist! The different shadings of dye blend with the scalp, like a lion in the wild, blending into the savannah. Where does all the hair come from? I think he must have a huge tonsure, and he grows the fringe really long to give the artist a medium.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:25 pm
by Walker
Looks kinda like Trump, with better hair.

Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:41 pm
by commonsense
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 7:24 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:52 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:08 am
I think you might be right. I thought it looked a bit strange
Look closely and you’ll see a broad band of baldness thinly covered by the combover.
If you can’t see it you must be Walker.
Umm ok. That's what combovers are-- an attempt to cover baldness. Do you have a point, or are you Walker?
The point is that his combover ineffectively hides his bald stripe, making him a buffoon no matter what anything else.
But it’s not so much of a point to spend much time on.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 9:24 pm
by Sculptor
Maybe you have been "debanked, by non-liquid gold"??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UPEbQjGLj8
Are you happy with a convicted fraudster for POTUS?
It's not just this latest coinviction, but the many others before his presidency?
Are you happy that he is seeking to enforce immunity for the POTUS? GIving carte blanche to act above the law like a tyrrant?
Are you aware that it was his won lawyer's evidence that dumped him in the shit this time - making claims of false persecuation obvious false?
Why are you avoiding the questions?
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 9:29 pm
by promethean75
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 4:55 am
by Walker
Before a president is elected, his qualification is determined by constitutional requirements, and the voting process. Period. Thus, the relevance of your questions has been isolated and answered.
That you don't approve such objective finality is your cross to bear.
Don't worry. The rules and laws will be selectively ignored and enforced by The Democrats Who Hate America, so such things as constitution and protecting the vote are just challenges for them to overcome. The voting process has already been rigged for maximum cheating potential, and they won't stop until Trump is in jail ... even if he's elected.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:02 am
by Walker
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 10:28 am
by Sculptor
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 4:55 am
Before a president is elected, his qualification is determined by constitutional requirements, and the voting process. Period. Thus, the relevance of your questions has been isolated and answered.
That you don't approve such objective finality is your cross to bear.
Don't worry. The rules and laws will be selectively ignored and enforced by The Democrats Who Hate America, so such things as constitution and protecting the vote are just challenges for them to overcome. The voting process has already been rigged for maximum cheating potential, and they won't stop until Trump is in jail ... even if he's elected.
So have you some sort of mental block to answering the most simple questions?
Is it that English is not a language you are very familiar with?
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:30 pm
by Walker
No, and no.
I answer questions that need to be answered.
I determine the need, after seeing how many questions are frivilous and biased.
For example, as you were already told, the essence of your questions has been answered, and that is about requirements to run for president. Objective requirements. An idiot can run for the presidency if he meets the simple requirements. After all, look at Biden. He's an idiot, and idiots voted for him.
Learn it, live it, love it, because that is reality, despite your desperate thrashing about.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:43 pm
by Walker
commonsense wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:41 pm
The point is that his combover ineffectively hides his bald stripe, making him a buffoon no matter what anything else.
But it’s not so much of a point to spend much time on.
Oh, I don't know about that. Based on this, you consider hair to be a determination of buffoonery, once again proving that criticisms of Trump are all about style and not substance.
Do you consider men who wear toupees to also be buffoons?
What other hair styles are buffoonish?
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:53 pm
by Walker
*
This could likely be the pattern of Trump’s balding. Just imagine this grown out long and swirly.
(Watch that your words don't make you his chair.)

Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:11 pm
by Walker
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 9:32 am
To the Americans on here; please vote for Trump and help make him your next President. He kept me entertained for four years and I could do with another four.
Thank you in advance.
I see what you mean. Entertaining.

Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:13 pm
by Sculptor
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:30 pm
No, and no.
I answer questions that need to be answered.
.
You are a moron.
Are you too scared to even think about those questions?
Fucking idiot
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:15 pm
by Sculptor
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:11 pm
I see what you mean.
Nah. You do not have the mental capacity to understand anything.
Why would you vote for a guy who thinks he is running against Obama??
Are you happy with a convicted fraudster for POTUS?
It's not just this latest coinviction, but the many others before his presidency?
Are you happy that he is seeking to enforce immunity for the POTUS? GIving carte blanche to act above the law like a tyrrant?
Are you aware that it was his won lawyer's evidence that dumped him in the shit this time - making claims of false persecuation obvious false?
Why are you avoiding the questions?