Philosophy Now Forum

Actually P is subject to other variable under a tautology.

nothing wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:22 pm

Actually P is subject to other variable under a tautology.

1. P actually has four poles as two pairs of conjugates: only two are being discussed as the other two are counter-space.
2. Why? Because you say it is?




P only exists because of the variables it manifests as.

If it is a cow, then (P <--> C).

If the number one, then (P-->n1).

Etc.

P can represent an infinite number of things and as such P exists if and only if it is infinite.

P is infinite and any statement that determines what P is makes P finite. In shorter terms P is defined by contexts outside of it.

If I say:

"P"

"P eats grass in a field."

"P is the color red."

"P is not happy".

In each of these contexts P means a different thing, in the first it can mean anything, however in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th it means a different things as the variables outside it define it.

P only exists because of the variables it manifests as.

If it is a cow, then (P <--> C).

If the number one, then (P-->n1).

P can represent an infinite number of things...

P is infinite...

If I say:

nothing wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:05 pm

P only exists because of the variables it manifests as.

There is only one variable with P: potential.

If it is a cow, then (P <--> C).

If the number one, then (P-->n1).

It is any (im)potential (un)conscious being.

P can represent an infinite number of things...

No, it can not.

P is infinite...

No, it is not.

...only in potential.

If I say:

You do not say.

Potentially is unactualized form from one angle of awareness, actual from another.

From a time zone where A progresses to B to B1 both B and B1 are potential.
From a time zone where A progressed to C and C can progress to D or D1, B as a potential in one time zone is an actual in another.

All knowledge exists through time.

You cannot say P is strictly potential, when P itself is actual as a quality that contains dynamic change (ie the further variables which stem from it).

nothing wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 4:16 pm

Potentially is unactualized form from one angle of awareness, actual from another.

I actually see it from a potentially dissimilar angle.

From a time zone where A progresses to B to B1 both B and B1 are potential.
From a time zone where A progressed to C and C can progress to D or D1, B as a potential in one time zone is an actual in another.

B has no intrinsic potential until A is actualized.
P is taken as its own isolated arbitrary variable.

O --/-> P --/-> Q

All knowledge exists through time.

It exists independent of it.

You cannot say P is strictly potential, when P itself is actual as a quality that contains dynamic change (ie the further variables which stem from it).

P is not strictly potential.
*P is a definite(ly unknown) variable which can behave according to a variable potential vs. actualized motion(s) viz. direction/orientation.

I have a circled pentagram.

LEG+2 CREATION
ARM -1 = Knowledge-negating-belief
HEAD: *P viz. will; equal capacity for good/evil
ARM +1 = Belief-based-ignorance
LEG -2 DESTRUCTION
______________________________________________________
-P Tree of Living Forever
+P Tree of Suffering/Death

You are not taking into account time.

nothing wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:19 pm

You are not taking into account time.

It's intrinsically implied: time is a circle to which *P is invariably subject to.

The *variability thus allows for 360 degrees of arc (viz. orientation).

And P is as a variable is a loop as each replacement of P is a variation of P.

nothing wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:57 pm

And P is as a variable is a loop as each replacement of P is a variation of P.

This is a part of the solution, not any problem.

Solutions are variations of the problem as the problem is a context of further contexts where the answer is a context(s) that exists as a variation of the problem.

For example the question: "Is the sky blue" is a set of contexts that results in specific other contexts (ie yes, no, positive, negative, color, space, etc.

*P is a variable bi-directional loop (ie. pentagon) whose "variation"
can either approach suffering or liberation. Such represents
the apex becoming either knowledge-negating-belief and/or belief(-based ignorance).

Each new variation (ie. solar year) can be compared with the last
to clarify the orientation to/from liberation/suffering.

Solutions are variations of the problem as the problem is a context of further contexts where the answer is a context(s) that exists as a variation of the problem.

roydop wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 10:33 pm There is no conclusion to thought via thought.

The conclusion to thought is to not think.

I think not, knowing I am willing not to think.

I believe not, knowing I am willing not to believe.

nothing wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:08 pm

roydop wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 10:33 pm There is no conclusion to thought via thought.

The conclusion to thought is to not think.

The same is true with belief.

I think not, knowing I am willing not to think.

*ceases thinking*

Now try believe:

I believe not, knowing I am willing not to believe.

*ceases believing*

It takes a believer to believe evil is good.

nothing wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 5:24 pm

Solutions are variations of the problem as the problem is a context of further contexts where the answer is a context(s) that exists as a variation of the problem.

False solutions (!) are variations of any problem as the problem is (then) a context of further contexts where the true answer is a context(s) that exists as a solution to the problem (incl. any/all derived further contexts).

Solution is the acknowledgement / cessation of any genesis of any problem.
Any/all solutions fire-and-foremost require acknowledgement of any/all problems,
including of any/all belief-based ignorance(s).

Having no conscious knowledge of ones own ignorance is thus a problem-in-and-of-itself
as it would take "belief" to sustain problem-as-solution. See: belief-based religion esp. Islam.