Philosophy Now Forum

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
Correction. You enjoyed Assad poisoning the children and women. What you've just said about me is more of your lies.

PhilX

Your 'logic is exquisite'.

And your logic is...nonexistent.

PhilX

Because I require proof, or at least convincing evidence? In case you didn't realise it, the justice system of every civilised democracy is based on that. Innocent until proven guilty? Mean anything? I suppose not, considering it doesn't exist in your country any more.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Your 'logic is exquisite'.

And your logic is...nonexistent.

PhilX

Because I require proof, or at least convincing evidence? In case you didn't realise it, the justice system of every civilised democracy is based on that.

You sure don't act like it. Can you prove that Assad hasn't committed those atrocities?

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
And your logic is...nonexistent.

PhilX

Because I require proof, or at least convincing evidence? In case you didn't realise it, the justice system of every civilised democracy is based on that.

You sure don't act like it. Can you prove that Assad hasn't committed those atrocities?

PhilX

Can you prove the US hasn't? Oh dear. You really don't understand the justice system. The onus is on the accuser to find evidence, for a very good reason. I will leave you to try to work it out. Try not to explode your aneurysms in the process.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Because I require proof, or at least convincing evidence? In case you didn't realise it, the justice system of every civilised democracy is based on that.

You sure don't act like it. Can you prove that Assad hasn't committed those atrocities?

PhilX

Can you prove the US hasn't? Oh dear. You really don't understand the justice system. The onus is on the accuser to find evidence, for a very good reason. I will leave you to try to work it out. Try not to explode your aneurysms in the process.

Since Assad started this, then the burden is on you to prove he hasn't ordered the attacks. That is part of the justice system.

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
You sure don't act like it. Can you prove that Assad hasn't committed those atrocities?

PhilX

Can you prove the US hasn't? Oh dear. You really don't understand the justice system. The onus is on the accuser to find evidence, for a very good reason. I will leave you to try to work it out. Try not to explode your aneurysms in the process.

Since Assad started this, then the burden is on you to prove he hasn't ordered the attacks. That is part of the justice system.

PhilX

Which 'justice system' would that be? And how the fuck could he prove that? He didn't start it. The US started it all. And when your landlady accuses you of molesting her children no doubt you will be happy to go to prison without trial, evidence, or any chance to defend yourself. And of course everyone in your town will have to pay too. How about the death penalty for them?
I was told you are sneaky and cunning. Now I see that. You really aren't as moronic as you appear to be. No one on earth could be.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Can you prove the US hasn't? Oh dear. You really don't understand the justice system. The onus is on the accuser to find evidence, for a very good reason. I will leave you to try to work it out. Try not to explode your aneurysms in the process.

Since Assad started this, then the burden is on you to prove he hasn't ordered the attacks. That is part of the justice system.

PhilX

Which 'justice system' would that be? And how the fuck could he prove that? He didn't start it. The US started it all. And when your landlady accuses you of molesting her children no doubt you will be happy to go to prison without trial, evidence, or any chance to defend yourself. And of course everyone in your town will have to pay too. How about the death penalty for them?
I was told you are sneaky and cunning. Now I see that. You really aren't as moronic as you appear to be. No one on earth could be.

You were told that I was sneaky and cunning LOL. You couldn't figure that one out by yourself. The rest of your post is too ridiculous to respond to. Figure it out for yourself why.

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
Since Assad started this, then the burden is on you to prove he hasn't ordered the attacks. That is part of the justice system.

PhilX

Which 'justice system' would that be? And how the fuck could he prove that? He didn't start it. The US started it all. And when your landlady accuses you of molesting her children no doubt you will be happy to go to prison without trial, evidence, or any chance to defend yourself. And of course everyone in your town will have to pay too. How about the death penalty for them?
I was told you are sneaky and cunning. Now I see that. You really aren't as moronic as you appear to be. No one on earth could be.

You were told that I was sneaky and cunning LOL. You couldn't figure that one out by yourself. The rest of your post is too ridiculous to respond to. Figure it out for yourself why.

PhilX

Because you are too sneaky and cunning to get caught? It's not a compliment btw. Sneaky and cunning doesn't equal intelligence.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Which 'justice system' would that be? And how the fuck could he prove that? He didn't start it. The US started it all. And when your landlady accuses you of molesting her children no doubt you will be happy to go to prison without trial, evidence, or any chance to defend yourself. And of course everyone in your town will have to pay too. How about the death penalty for them?
I was told you are sneaky and cunning. Now I see that. You really aren't as moronic as you appear to be. No one on earth could be.

You were told that I was sneaky and cunning LOL. You couldn't figure that one out by yourself. The rest of your post is too ridiculous to respond to. Figure it out for yourself why.

PhilX

Because you are too sneaky and cunning to get caught? It's not a compliment btw. Sneaky and cunning doesn't equal intelligence.

My oh my. Too sneaky and cunning to get caught. So what were you trying to catch me at? Looks like you can chalk that one up to your failure.

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
You were told that I was sneaky and cunning LOL. You couldn't figure that one out by yourself. The rest of your post is too ridiculous to respond to.
PhilX

Because you are too sneaky and cunning to get caught? It's not a compliment btw. Sneaky and cunning doesn't equal intelligence.

My oh my. Too sneaky and cunning to get caught. So what were you trying to catch me at? Looks like you can chalk that one up to your failure.

PhilX

Oh dear. How the hell do you function even on the most basic level?

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Because you are too sneaky and cunning to get caught? It's not a compliment btw. Sneaky and cunning doesn't equal intelligence.

My oh my. Too sneaky and cunning to get caught. So what were you trying to catch me at? Looks like you can chalk that one up to your failure.

PhilX

Oh dear. How the hell do you even function on a basic level?

Better than you, apparently.

PhilX

''There is no basis to the Trump Administration’s accusations that the government of Bashar al Assad was involved in deliberately triggering a chemical weapons attack with a view to killing Syrian civilians.

This December 2013 article by Global Research’s Correspondent Carla Stea at UN Headquarters confirms that the “Opposition” rebels were in possession of chemical weapons. According to the UN mission report, Syrian soldiers as well as civilians were the target of chemical weapons attacks led by opposition rebels.

The US sponsored “rebels” had been trained in the use of chemical weapons by specialists on contract to the Pentagon. What a surprise

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, April 8, 2017

http://www.globalresearch.ca/syria-un-m ... es/5363139

Not sure why I'm bothering. No one gives a crap about whether or not something is true anyway.

O lied and children died.

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:
And your logic is...nonexistent.

PhilX

Because I require proof, or at least convincing evidence? In case you didn't realise it, the justice system of every civilised democracy is based on that.

You sure don't act like it. Can you prove that Assad hasn't committed those atrocities?

PhilX

Btw, pea-brain, I'm not saying Assad DIDN'T do it, I'm simply asking for evidence. Isn't that NORMAL?? You are the one making a definitive statement. I just can't see any motive for him to do it. The last time he was accused (without evidence) of gassing people was prior to when the US started bombing his country (using his alleged use of chemical weapons as an excuse). He would have to be as insane and cretinous as you are to do it 'again'. You seem to think the truth is relative to whichever side you happen to be on. Ahh no. The truth is neutral and unalterable. Something either happened or it didn't.
It's not exactly a secret that the US is a big fan of the use of chemical weapons when it suits it. Do you seriously think the US powermongers give a shit about some dead Syrians? It's not as if it hasn't murdered tens of thousands of them (and as usual it's the children who have suffered the most) since its arms industry-backed murdering spree began. How pathetically naive and credulous are you exactly?

http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/08/26/exc ... -iran/amp/


At least I don't have to be irritated by your retarded responses for a while. Have a nice month's holiday.

Walker wrote:O lied and children died.

Talking about lies, children and presidents. You know the one Bush retold umpteen times and which helped your Congress and Senate decide to invade Iraq.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_(testimony)

Is this another example of your blundering self-reliance?

Arising_uk wrote:

Walker wrote:O lied and children died.

Talking about lies, children and presidents. You know the one Bush retold umpteen times and which helped your Congress and Senate decide to invade Iraq.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_(testimony)

Is this another example of your blundering self-reliance?

ISIS formed out of Obama’s incompetence.
Bush did not create ISIS.

Your guy Obama is a stooge.

Turns out Obama was the real Russian stooge.
http://nypost.com/2017/04/10/turns-out- ... an-stooge/

(Progs have a really big tell. They insert their own methods of machinations into their accusations.)