Philosophy Now Forum

Lev Muishkin wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:You're a good example, talk much and do nothing, must be your non-american genes.

I'm glad you admit that talking much and doing nothing is based on non-American genes.

There is no such thing as "american genes" and thus no "non american genes".
What a sad deluded life you must lead.

You must be talking about Arising, who brought up the subject, but you're obviously the one with a sad deluded life, who hides behind a stupid little picture that supposedly represents yourself.

bobevenson wrote:

Lev Muishkin wrote:

bobevenson wrote: I'm glad you admit that talking much and doing nothing is based on non-American genes.

There is no such thing as "american genes" and thus no "non american genes".
What a sad deluded life you must lead.

You must be talking about Arising, who brought up the subject, but you're obviously the one with a sad deluded life, who hides behind a stupid little picture that supposedly represents yourself.

It makes it easier to scroll through and find my last post in a thread. If you were smarter, or had anything to contribute you might also have selected a arbitrary image for your avatar.

.









..........................................................









.

Lev Muishkin wrote:If you were smarter, or had anything to contribute you might also have selected a arbitrary image for your avatar.

Well, at least I'm smart enough to use "an" instead of "a."

bobevenson wrote:

Lev Muishkin wrote:If you were smarter, or had anything to contribute you might also have selected a arbitrary image for your avatar.

Well, at least I'm smart enough to use "an" instead of "a."

Bob, you can do better than that, it's always true that those that understand, yet try and win anything, by correcting ones typo's, is actually the looser.

SpheresOfBalance wrote:

bobevenson wrote:

Lev Muishkin wrote:If you were smarter, or had anything to contribute you might also have selected a arbitrary image for your avatar.

Well, at least I'm smart enough to use "an" instead of "a."

Bob, you can do better than that, it's always true that those that understand, yet try and win anything, by correcting ones typo's, is actually the looser.

Why don't you and that other guy take a remedial English class? In your case, you can learn that the possessive form of one is "one's," mot "ones," the plural of typo is "typos," not "typo's," and that the word is "loser," not "looser."

Lev Muishkin wrote:If you were smarter, or had anything to contribute you might also have selected a arbitrary image for your avatar.

bobevenson wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote:

bobevenson wrote: Well, at least I'm smart enough to use "an" instead of "a."

Bob, you can do better than that, it's always true that those that understand, yet try and win anything, by correcting ones typo's, is actually the looser.

Why don't you and that other guy take a remedial English class? In your case, you can learn that the possessive form of one is "one's," mot "ones," the plural of typo is "typos," not "typo's," and that the word is "loser," not "looser."

Probably because I'd rather be smart enough to know that what I highlighted in purple in your message, immediately above, is not the only possible answer, understanding that your concern with my English is trivial by comparison. In other words, I'd rather be a Philosopher than a English Professor.