Page 8 of 9

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:58 pm
by Arising_uk
Because of you I have and it's because the 'second coming' needs 'its' anti-baptist. As evidenced by your numerology of your name.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:43 pm
by bobevenson
Arising_uk wrote:As evidenced by the numerology of your name.
The fact that my name, Robert Merlin Evenson, adds up to the Unholy Trinity of Satan, False Prophet and Beast in English Gematria Simplex (A=1 to Z=26), is a sign that I am the divinely-appointed representative of mankind to set the rest of humanity straight.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 1:54 pm
by Ginkgo
bobevenson wrote:
Arising_uk wrote:
bobevenson wrote:Wikipedia talks about gematria as though it were restricted to Hebrew, and it doesn't link gematria to numerology. Unfortunately, it doesn't show Greek gematria, where the Greek form of Jesus (Iesous) adds up to 888, and English gematria simplex, where Iesous adds up to 88, a mystical connection with our past in Ouzo combinations.
As usual your selective reading compliments your confirmation bias so let me help by quoting the first line "Gematria is an Assyro-Babylonian system of numerology ...".
OK, I guess I missed that reference, and, as a matter of fact, a numerology book was instrumental in "The Ouzo Prophecy" being written. As I have probably mentioned before, in the beginning, I was merely looking for a way to promote the game of Ouzo, a formalized version of the casual bar game of liar's poker, played with the serial number of a dollar bill. In a relatively short period, I heard the Biblical reference to 666 mentioned a number of times. It always reminded me of an Ouzo bid of three 6's. Finally, I asked somebody where 666 was in the Bible. He said the book of Revelation, and at the time, I didn't know if that was the New Testament or the Old Testament, having no knowledge or interest in the Bible at all. But I checked it out, and it looked like Rev. 13:18 was a description of the game. It occurred to me that I could promote Ouzo in a light-hearted way as being predicted in the Bible. I got the idea of writing a short paper called "The Ouzo Prophecy" to exploit this "prediction." However, after browsing through many Biblical commentaries in Cincinnati bookstores, I came to the conclusion that there were only two basic interpretations of 666, not enough to write even a short paper, and so I basically abandoned the idea. However, one day, I walked into a bookstore, and about halfway back, I was suddenly confronted by a wall of numerology books to my immediate right (actually a vision or hallucination since the numerology books were shelved at the back of the store). But it was like I was confronted by these books, and I said to myself, "I wonder if a numerology book would have anything to say about 666," never having looked at a numerology book in my life. I started browsing through the books, and sure enough, most of them discussed 666, although not mentioning anythng I didn't already know. Finally, I found a book in which the author discussed being at a scientific lecture where two nearby members of the audience were talking about the carbon atom of 6 protons, 6 neutrons and 6 electrons. She came to the conclusion that this was the answer to the Biblical 666. I said to myself, "Wow, that's something you'd never read in a Biblical commentary," and then I said, "Now I can write "The Ouzo Prophecy." For some reason, that third interpretation made all the difference in the world, and marked the beginning of the Church of Ouzo.


Bob, what has carbon 12 got to do with it?

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:01 pm
by bobevenson
Ginkgo wrote:Bob, what has carbon 12 got to do with it?
It doesn't have anything to do with the Biblical meaning of 666; it's just another false interpretation like all the others before "The Ouzo Prophecy" was written, other than indicating that we are dealing with the evil of mankind.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:02 pm
by Wyman
"I wonder if a numerology book would have anything to say about 666," never having looked at a numerology book in my life. I started browsing through the books, and sure enough, most of them discussed 666
Like moths to a light bulb.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:07 pm
by Ginkgo
bobevenson wrote:
Ginkgo wrote:Bob, what has carbon 12 got to do with it?
It doesn't have anything to do with the Biblical meaning of 666; it's just another false interpretation like all the others before "The Ouzo Prophecy" was written.
Didn't you say that the third interpretation makes a difference and now you can write the prophecy?

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:13 pm
by bobevenson
Wyman wrote:
"I wonder if a numerology book would have anything to say about 666," never having looked at a numerology book in my life. I started browsing through the books, and sure enough, most of them discussed 666
Like moths to a light bulb.
Yes, and I saw the light when I read that particular interpretation.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:19 pm
by bobevenson
Ginkgo wrote:Didn't you say that the third interpretation makes a difference and now you can write the prophecy?
The difference it made was to provide just enough new raw material to write the paper.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:28 pm
by Ginkgo
bobevenson wrote:
Ginkgo wrote:Didn't you say that the third interpretation makes a difference and now you can write the prophecy?
The difference it made was to provide just enough new raw material to write the paper.
When i asked the original question in relation to carbon 666 you told me it was a false interpretation and of no significance. That is to say before you edited that post. Now you are saying it provided enough raw material to write the paper.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:36 pm
by bobevenson
Ginkgo wrote:When i asked the original question in relation to carbon 666 you told me it was a false interpretation and of no significance. That is to say before you edited that post. Now you are saying it provided enough raw material to write the paper.
All the previous interpretations of 666 were incorrect, although they did point to the evil of mankind. The significance of the carbon atom interpretation is that it provided just enough new material for me to write the paper.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:45 pm
by Ginkgo
bobevenson wrote:
Ginkgo wrote:When i asked the original question in relation to carbon 666 you told me it was a false interpretation and of no significance. That is to say before you edited that post. Now you are saying it provided enough raw material to write the paper.
All the previous interpretations of 666 were incorrect, although they did point to the evil of mankind. The significance of the carbon atom interpretation is that it provided just enough new material for me to write the paper.


Bob you shouldn't change your original answer to my question in the middle of our conservation.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 2:58 pm
by bobevenson
Ginkgo wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Ginkgo wrote:When i asked the original question in relation to carbon 666 you told me it was a false interpretation and of no significance. That is to say before you edited that post. Now you are saying it provided enough raw material to write the paper.
All the previous interpretations of 666 were incorrect, although they did point to the evil of mankind. The significance of the carbon atom interpretation is that it provided just enough new material for me to write the paper.


Bob you shouldn't change your original answer to my question in the middle of our conservation.
What the hell do you want from me? I'm sorry if my comments were not sufficiently clear to you, but I hope you will accept my clarification without beating me over the head with it.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:43 pm
by Arising_uk
bobevenson wrote:The fact that my name, Robert Merlin Evenson, adds up to the Unholy Trinity of Satan, False Prophet and Beast in English Gematria Simplex (A=1 to Z=26), is a sign that I am the divinely-appointed representative of mankind to set the rest of humanity straight.
Yes, but 'divinely' appointed by whom? And onto to what path? As you've already said its to get us to agree to give our dominion over to this 'Beast'.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:29 pm
by bobevenson
Arising_uk wrote:
bobevenson wrote:The fact that my name, Robert Merlin Evenson, adds up to the Unholy Trinity of Satan, False Prophet and Beast in English Gematria Simplex (A=1 to Z=26), is a sign that I am the divinely-appointed representative of mankind to set the rest of humanity straight.
Yes, but 'divinely' appointed by whom? And onto to what path? As you've already said its to get us to agree to give our dominion over to this 'Beast'.
Well, let's see, it's all allegorical, of course, but I assume there must be some mystical force that guided me in writing "The Ouzo Prophecy" since it certainly wasn't written with any spiritual motivation in mind, and while I was visited by a number of visions and hallucinations that could possibly be viewed as pathological under other circumstances, since they were only directly or indirectly related to Ouzo, I must reluctantly draw the conclusion that I am the humble recipient and prophet of that which is divinely inspired.

Re: questioning GOD's design decisions

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:18 am
by Arising_uk
Or you could draw the more reasonable conclusion that it was a pathological event.

If not then I'd seriously consider that you are batting for the wrong side, i.e. your 'divinity' is not the one you think it is.