Not really, the look and the voice are too abrasive for me, If I'm going to look at a female, I would ask that they at least be pretty.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Does the Joan Rivers look float your boat?
A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Are you trying to say something here or have you posted a clue to a cryptic crossword by mistake?thedoc wrote: Well, "good" is a relative term and if you and she feel the same way about the situation, then I guess she would be good to you. That does explain a few things.
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Really and just who is shouting them down, certainly no-one that I know.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Actually I wasn't thinking of them, but since you mentioned it, they are scumbags and hypocrites. It's just a shame that when anyone tells the truth about kristian scumbaggery they get shousted down as 'vitriolic' and 'just like Hillary Clinton'. The truth is the truth, whether people like it or not.
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Sorry that you seem to have missed it.Harbal wrote:Are you trying to say something here or have you posted a clue to a cryptic crossword by mistake?thedoc wrote: Well, "good" is a relative term and if you and she feel the same way about the situation, then I guess she would be good to you. That does explain a few things.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
I'm sure I've agreed with you on occasion, but you are such a nasty old butt-hurt coot that you always manage to soil our beautiful times together.thedoc wrote:Well, "good" is a relative term and if you and she feel the same way about the situation, then I guess she would be good to you. That does explain a few things.Harbal wrote:Hillary is just a face on a screen to me, I'm not interested enough in her to pay any attention to what she is. VT may express herself rather vigorously at times but I usually find that her underlying thinking is pretty similar to mine. Sorry to disagree with you, doc, but, as far as this forum is concerned, I see her as one of the good guys.thedoc wrote: Do you know any women like that? VT and Hillary certainly don't qualify.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
You must trip up a lot in the street then.thedoc wrote:Not really, the look and the voice are too abrasive for me, If I'm going to look at a female, I would ask that they at least be pretty.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Does the Joan Rivers look float your boat?
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Incredible that they actually believe it's a good look. I imagine doc's wife as a wind-tunneler, with a kristian bee-hive 'do and huge teeth.Harbal wrote:That is one hell of a look, isn't it?vegetariantaxidermy wrote:the stretched, wind-tunnel look, so favoured by yank females
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
The startled cat fish also seems to be quite popular (see Ma Stallone).vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Incredible that they actually believe it's a good look.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Really? You are a Christian who does not believe in an end of times when 'God' and Jesus return to judge us all and have a big battle with the unbelievers to establish 'heaven' upon the earth.thedoc wrote:Who are the "end-of-timers" I don't think I know any.
All theist religions have such a scenario I thought?
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossilosgart wrote:...
Evolution has not found one transitional species and proven a link to human ancestry. It is inferred philosophically.
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_t ... al_fossils
You won't find a 'transitional species' as, one, you wouldn't be able to recognise it as one at the time, two they'll go extinct due to being a 'transitional species' and three, and this is the biggy, there are no singular ''transitional species' in the 'missing-link' sense you wish as all species are in effect 'transitional species' due to Evolution.
http://evolution-101.blogspot.co.uk/200 ... ecies.html
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Yes! And those bloody trout mouths, (although I think that's an insult to trout). Women can be the stupidest creatures on the planet.Harbal wrote:The startled cat fish also seems to be quite popular (see Ma Stallone).vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Incredible that they actually believe it's a good look.
I think it's an old photo. She's about a hundred now.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
And there's the nail and the head, as none are started for the cause of 'Atheism' but Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières, The Red Cross, UNICEF, are good examples no? Whereas many Christian charities appear to be exactly to further the cause of Christianity rather than just to do the right thing.Immanuel Can wrote:...
Meanwhile, why don't we sit down and enumerate all the institutions for public good that were started by the cause of Atheism....
p.s.
Oh! And Foundation Beyond Belief.
Last edited by Arising_uk on Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
The idiot doesn't know the difference between secular and 'atheist'.Arising_uk wrote:And there's the nail and the head, as none are started for the cause of 'Atheism' but Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières, The Red Cross, UNICEF, are good examples no? Whereas many Christian charities appear to be exactly to further the cause of Christianity rather than just to do the right thing.Immanuel Can wrote:...
Meanwhile, why don't we sit down and enumerate all the institutions for public good that were started by the cause of Atheism....
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
"No true Scotsman". Just shows how much you don't know, and haven't been paying attention.Arising_uk wrote:Really? You are a Christian who does not believe in an end of times when 'God' and Jesus return to judge us all and have a big battle with the unbelievers to establish 'heaven' upon the earth.thedoc wrote:Who are the "end-of-timers" I don't think I know any.
All theist religions have such a scenario I thought?
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Thanks, (not) you know I can't unsee that now. You really are cruel.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I think it's an old photo. She's about a hundred now.