ANNOUNCEMENT FROM IC

[Gary Childress]

If you "reject God", then IC thinks you are either "mentally ill" or "deranged" or on your way to it.

My suggestions:

1) Accept God and the Bible as God's word.

or

2) Save up your money for psychiatry and therapy bills, if not for now, then for your future.

SOURCE: viewtopic.php?p=813558#p813558

Please save yourselves. Consider it a public service announcement. It's too late for me, but maybe God will smile on me for directing more people to the Bible so that you all are saved. Or maybe God will roast me in Hell anyway for my heartless atrocities inflicted on humanity. (You know, atrocities like being skeptical of the Bible.)

Further debate on the topic: viewtopic.php?p=813609#p813609

[Greatest I am]

If you "reject God", then IC thinks you are either "mentally ill" or "deranged" or on your way to it.

My suggestions:

1) Accept God and the Bible as God's word.

or

2) Save up your money for psychiatry and therapy bills, if not for now, then for your future.

Is the Trinity a moral God?

That God puts the good of the few above the good of the many.

Is that immoral?

[Walker]

According to Romans 2:14-16, reading The Holy Bible is not necessary to know The Meaning of The Holy Bible.

When the meaning is known, God's word is recognized as true, which is distinct from the rote learning of a child, or a man-child who claims to know nothing, like a babe in the woods.

[Greatest I am]

According to Romans 2:14-16, reading The Holy Bible is not necessary to know The Meaning of The Holy Bible.

When the meaning is known, God's word is recognized as true, which is distinct from the rote learning of a child, or a man-child who claims to know nothing, like a babe in the woods.

Is it true and right that the good of the few should be put above the good of the many?

Is it a truth and right that an incompetent creator have his son pay for creative goof?

I see a coward giving his son a grenade, pulling the pin and running away from Jesus.

You?

[Greatest I am]

When the meaning is known, God's word is recognized as true, which is distinct from the rote learning of a child, or a man-child who claims to know nothing, like a babe in the woods.

What do you tell children when they ask if the talking serpent in Eden was real?

If that was Satan as paintings show, why on earth would God put Satan in Eden unless he wanted her to tempt.

That or he just goofed.

[Gary Childress]

According to Romans 2:14-16, reading The Holy Bible is not necessary to know The Meaning of The Holy Bible.

When the meaning is known, God's word is recognized as true, which is distinct from the rote learning of a child, or a man-child who claims to know nothing, like a babe in the woods.

"Man-child"? As a Trump sycophant, you might want to use something other than "man-child" as an insult. Trump might get his diapers in a wad.

[Walker]

A Man-Child hides behind relativism as a pretense for claiming to not know good from evil, and then masks the hiding with silly questions.

One would think that with the knowledge of good and evil that everyone has, courtesy of the snake/Eve/Adam conspiracy, initiated by that lowdown snake, humans wouldn’t ask so many questions but as you know since they do, perhaps like the snake folks can’t stand on their own two, indecisive, fence-sitting feet as to what is good and what is evil.

[Walker]

Before being cursed to crawl for beguiling the Woman-child who had no inherent knowledge of good and evil, how did the subtil serpent purport to transport? These are the questions that inspire misotheists.

[Walker]

Or maybe God will roast me in Hell anyway for my heartless atrocities inflicted on humanity.

If "heartless atrocity," is indeed an accurate description of your actions masked as hyperbole to play the fool for God, then from a limited human perspective, which is all you've got to work with, your "maybe God" could be replaced with "likely God".

However, from the same limited perspective, if that declaration is in fact a delusional description of your actions necessary to bolster the imagined potency of effect upon the world, then unrequited mal-intent could well be a ticket to the same destination when the judge knows what's written and not written on the heart ... as the aforementioned verse from The Holy Bible explains in a timeless attempt to pierce the protective carapace of selective attention likely attached to discoverers and seekers.

[Walker]

What do you tell children when they ask if the talking serpent in Eden was real?

I would say yes, of course.

If asked to explain, I would say to the child that because all humans now have inherent knowledge of good and evil, then the theoretical capacity of a human for the understanding of snake messaging, without that inherent knowledge of good and evil, which was Eve’s contextual condition, cannot be ascertained with certainty. Therefore, without the mental static churned up by that inherent knowledge of good and evil, Eve may have well understood the language of snake … just as now, even with the inherent human filter of good and evil (a duality filter borne of physical bi-lateral symmetry), snakes can still transmit rudimentary intent that gets received on the primal frequency. If the child doesn’t understand any of that I would say, maintain attention upon the words and the meaning will reveal when you’re ready to understand, and it will be quite simple.

[Walker]

Saying that folks should not seek spiritual refuge in the world that is Satan’s dominion doesn’t shout the message as clearly as the favoured son, as good as he was, failing to find refuge in the world. Even so, folks ignore the abstract lesson and blame God for not making everyone a comfortable Pet with only imagined problems (a man-child dream).

Every made-in-the-image-of father who sends his sons out into that cold, cruel world of Satan's dominion can empathize.

[Greatest I am]

A Man-Child hides behind relativism as a pretense for claiming to not know good from evil, and then masks the hiding with silly questions.

One would think that with the knowledge of good and evil that everyone has, courtesy of the snake/Eve/Adam conspiracy, initiated by that lowdown snake, humans wouldn’t ask so many questions but as you know since they do, perhaps like the snake folks can’t stand on their own two, indecisive, fence-sitting feet as to what is good and what is evil.

Like Christians who refuse to look at the immoral aspects of their God, who puts the good of the few above the good of the many.

This for Trinity.

https://1drv.ms/i/c/53931cff4f961442/IQ ... g?e=5qqSjf

[Greatest I am]

Before being cursed to crawl for beguiling the Woman-child who had no inherent knowledge of good and evil, how did the subtil serpent purport to transport? These are the questions that inspire misotheists.

I doubt that, as they know why Christians sing of Adam's sin as a happy fault and necessary to God's plan.

They wonder more on why moral people adore a demonstrably immoral God.

Fix that garbage thinking and you will be seen as the hero of the world.

[Greatest I am]

What do you tell children when they ask if the talking serpent in Eden was real?

I would say yes, of course.

If asked to explain, I would say to the child that because all humans now have inherent knowledge of good and evil, then the theoretical capacity of a human for the understanding of snake messaging, without that inherent knowledge of good and evil, which was Eve’s contextual condition, cannot be ascertained with certainty. Therefore, without the mental static churned up by that inherent knowledge of good and evil, Eve may have well understood the language of snake … just as now, even with the inherent human filter of good and evil (a duality filter borne of physical bi-lateral symmetry), snakes can still transmit rudimentary intent that gets received on the primal frequency. If the child doesn’t understand any of that I would say, maintain attention upon the words and the meaning will reveal when you’re ready to understand, and it will be quite simple.

So you would lie to children.

What a cruel thing to do.

You surprised me.

[Greatest I am]

Saying that folks should not seek spiritual refuge in the world that is Satan’s dominion doesn’t shout the message as clearly as the favoured son, as good as he was, failing to find refuge in the world. Even so, folks ignore the abstract lesson and blame God for not making everyone a comfortable Pet with only imagined problems (a man-child dream).

Every made-in-the-image-of father who sends his sons out into that cold, cruel world of Satan's dominion can empathize.

I love seekers as they have rejected the genocidal Trinity.

Atheist are even more honest and say that if there is a God, he better be better than the genocidal one Christians and Muslims now adore.