Prove me wrong: There is a God

[Fairy]

The evidence is overwhelming, something exists. Existence is without doubt or error.

[Fairy]

It’s funny how people will believe in Wi-Fi, invisible waves powering everything, but still think energy, frequency and vibration are just some mystical nonsense.

[Fairy]

Your human life would have been impossible without somewhere to live.

Planet earth, what a beautiful place gifted free of charge for all who came to dwell here.

Already teeming with abundance providing every conceivable material you will ever need to guarantee your very survival.

Take care of your ever loving home, and your magnificent garden that stretches for miles and miles. And your animal companions. She is love. She is your sustainer, made especially for you by your loving father, so that you could multiply and perpetuate the love to your hearts content.

[Fairy]

What you are is so profound that it is literally unbelievable. You are unbelievable.
I experience what I am and I still don’t believe it. Existence is unbelievable.

[Impenitent]

believe it or not:

in the springtime, the trees find re-leaf

-Imp

[Fairy]

believe it or not:

in the springtime, the trees find re-leaf

-Imp

From self to self, an eternal spring.

[Fairy]

Sometimes answers come to you that only you can understand.That is why it is so important to have a clear mind to receive and understand the message. Once the message is received, it’s time to hang up the phone.

[promethean75]

Beware of people who believe in god and talk of 'receiving messages. It's a hit or miss with these people. One guy might end up murdering people to stop an earthquake or killing prostitutes because he was given a mission in his 'message'.

No, i say. If there were this god, he would not be giving messages like some fifth grader playing a school game. If there were a god, whatever he told you, he could tell me, too. Unless he's trying to make us all conspiratorial and suspicious of each other.

Irony: regarding the most important things, there should be the most transparency. Incidentally, what most consider of the greatest importance - the religious question - is a subject with the least transparency. Under the purview of the State or God himfuckingself, we get nothing but confusion, contradiction, and deception. Either the State's breaking the ten commandments or two guys, each claiming to be the one true prophet, are fighting it out in the courtyard, or God created a fantastic world once full of magic and dragons and fiery swords and faith healers, then destroyed it, then expected people living thousands of years later in a world nothing like this virtual middle-earth described in the bible to actually believe any of that shit happened so long ago.

[promethean75]

"Planet earth, what a beautiful place gifted free of charge for all who came to dwell here"

Excellent. Not only is that not true, but one is also positively put in danger the second they are born unless they submit to laboring in exchange for a wage or are under the care of someone who is doing so. In either case, one is born without being aksed first and then put into a place where he may be physically harmed or restrained (even imprisoned) if he does not comply with the laws of that society (which he made no contribution in making or creating laws for), take a job and stay out of area x (or be trespassing).

These facts are at the foundation of the anarchist's philosophy. They are juggernaut truths that demolish any philosophy in their path. There is absolutely no basis for human civilization other than the brute nonconsentual force of those who own the most property and subject those born into the world to their demands (their laws).

Now, not only does this level three-quarters of philosophy, but it also has a nice iconoclastic effect. It takes the punishment man is told to endure for the sins of his fathers and turns this formula against god; god, and all that stands with him, pays for the world that one was thrown into, that one had no hand in making and is therefore entirely unresponsible for.

Thank you for the opportunity to explain this. I couldn't have done it without your error.

[promethean75]

This is why every age since the dawn of civilization has been illegitimate (so far). By virtue of the above post, a civilization that is not organized just by the brute force of a few property owners and their legislator pals would have long become a marxist society. There is no marxist society. Ergo, there is no legitimate society.

And taking it a step further, a marxist society would, to much of the same degree, enforce the same basic laws, yes. But the suffering of the laws at the citizen's expense would be greatly mitigated. Costs would be lower, it would not be so difficult to make money, and one might even enjoy having a job!

Not until this has been tried first and failed at would any of you earn the right to denounce an anarchist.

Which is more or less saying none of you are political philosophers. For political philosophy sans marxism can only lead to anarchism... or never gets a foot past it, i should say.

[Fairy]

“Thank you for the opportunity to explain this. I couldn't have done it without your error.”

And thank you too for your mansplain.

I exist without doubt or error, that I can be certain of. There’s nothing else to disprove this certainty. No proof necessary either.