Anti-Semitism

[Phil8659]

<rate absspeed="-1"> <volume level="40"/> <VOICE REQUIRED="NAME=Charles16" >
<Anti-Semitism.docx Statistics:
Words - 924
Characters - 4.073
Paragraphs - 24
Sentences - 52
Sentences per Paragraph - 2.6
Words per Sentence - 17.2
Characters per Word - 4.2
Flesch Reading Ease - 67.4
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level - 8.1
Passive Sentences - 28.69>

[Phil8659]

Anti-Semitism

Is that bad? What is Semitism?
A member of any of the peoples said (in the Bible, Genesis 10) to be descended from Shem, or speaking a Semitic language. WordWeb Pro. Now as far as WordWeb Pro goes, I once read of a man who used, it is written and is it not written, and never claiming that a book said anything. Amazing, is it not, an illiterate dictionary? Is one language magic? Why not simply call that language, Harry Potter Grammar?

<rate absspeed="0"> <volume level="50"/> <VOICE REQUIRED="NAME=IVONA 2 Brian" >
Really? What is factually demonstrable that anyone is a descendent from a particular person from an unknown time, written in a book? Who has ever gotten a D. N. A. sample from a word in a book?
Really? how does speaking any particular grammar system magically change one’s D. N. A?
Really? Is it even possible, when the definition of a mind, is the same for every human being, to claim that a mind can be grouped by any other thing then being functional or dysfunctional? Provably capable or not capable of judgment?

And as a mind is an information processor which depends upon literacy to function, is not literacy the only standard by which the functionality of the mind is measured?

Which is worse, being anti-semantic, or anti-semitic? Which is worse, that which is the result of a standard measure, or that which is no measure of anything at all?

Is not every mind judged by the same standard, and is not claiming to be descended from someone thousands of years ago, or that they are special because of which system of grammar they sometimes use, or maybe never used at all, just bat shit crazy?

A mind is measured by its ability to do its biologically defined job, to tend the Garden of Life. Now that is provable biology, and it is provable that all of us are judged by that one standard, a standard which is the direct result of a functional mind.

Every mind, ever born is Anti-Semitic, simply because only someone bat shit crazy thinks the standard for a mind is D.N.A, or being descended from an unknowable makes someone special.
It is a biological fact, that a mind which does not know judgment is dysfunctional. That is provable. It is also provable that mankind is still too dysfunctional to have ever written a correct grammar book, or ever used words in accordance with the truth of things.

Is it written, anywhere in the Bible, that a people who is incapable of judgment, has never once written a correct grammar book, has never established judgment on the earth, is special? Or is it written, that only after this has happened, that Nomocracy is understood and used by mankind, only then will God have made a special people?

Don’t let the facts get in the way of praising a savage humanity, or blowing yourself up to billboard size.

Does D. N. A. determine if we are a species called man? Has it ever been used to determine if anyone is capable of judgment? I mean, has D. N. A. ever been used for the foundation of literacy? Is literacy the product of anthropomorphism? Or is claiming that it is, bat shit crazy?

Where is it written that God is a respecter of persons? Or is it written that God is making a Man to Tend the Garden of Life and in order to do that job, mankind must know judgment? Where is it written that anyone can claim that they are special? In short, what is the standard for being special, doing the work we were made to do, or running around like an idiot claiming you are special? As written in our own biology, as written in the Bible, what makes mankind a special people?

Be it in the Bible or in a biology book, we are designed to do a job, maintain and promote life. It is just plain bat shit crazy to keep on insisting that we are too special to do our own work, that it is much more fun to run around like madmen murdering, robbing, raping and pillaging, or whining and crying that nobody thinks you are special, while babbling bull-shit.

Was not Shem, a member of a people once called Adam and Eve? Which were said to be made to tend the Garden of Life? Adam and Eve, or Shem? Is there any D. N. A. test which can prove that man is not man?

When children grow up to be illiterate and insane as a result, which is to blame, the refusal to eliminate the anti-semantic, or the anti-semitic, or is the result the same for both? Or do we just love bull-shit and mayhem because we, ourselves are just bat shit crazy and very, very SPECIAL? Simple people eat crap in a lie, is that a Tocco, or a croissant?

Are people special when they tend the garden of life, or are they special when they have provably turned it into a shit hole?

Is it written that man’s mockery of truth will always be allowed, or is it written, that those who destroy the earth will be destroyed? If you were to make an example out of a people, would it be the most intelligent, or the stupidest people of all time? So, what has D. N. A. have to do with it?

[MikeNovack]

The meaning of words depends on how they are used, not upon their apparent meaning based on their structure.

So no, "anti-semitism" does NOT mean opposition to/hatred of smites but o Jews.

[Phil8659]

The meaning of words depends on how they are used, not upon their apparent meaning based on their structure.

So no, "anti-semitism" does NOT mean opposition to/hatred of smites but o Jews.

Well, if you want to argue with the dictionary, be my guest. There are plenty of dictionaries to argue with.

And, you can argue with anyone who claims to be Jewish also, and get as many different meanings of the word from them, genius.

Or, you might argue with a grammar teacher who will help you on your educational discovery of the meaning of what I wrote.

Just look at it this way, you have a wonderful opportunity to grow a brain.

[SpheresOfBalance]

<rate absspeed="-1"> <volume level="40"/> <VOICE REQUIRED="NAME=Charles16" >
<Anti-Semitism.docx Statistics:
Words - 924
Characters - 4.073
Paragraphs - 24
Sentences - 52
Sentences per Paragraph - 2.6
Words per Sentence - 17.2
Characters per Word - 4.2
Flesch Reading Ease - 67.4
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level - 8.1
Passive Sentences - 28.69>

Anti-Semitism or anti any culture or belief is anti-understanding the truth of humanity on planet earth. It's ignorance supreme.

[Phil8659]

<rate absspeed="-1"> <volume level="40"/> <VOICE REQUIRED="NAME=Charles16" >
<Anti-Semitism.docx Statistics:
Words - 924
Characters - 4.073
Paragraphs - 24
Sentences - 52
Sentences per Paragraph - 2.6
Words per Sentence - 17.2
Characters per Word - 4.2
Flesch Reading Ease - 67.4
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level - 8.1
Passive Sentences - 28.69>

Anti-Semitism or anti any culture or belief is anti-understanding the truth of humanity on planet earth. It's ignorance supreme.

Is it on par with being ignorant that all information is processed in binary, which means all grammar systems are founded not in axioms, Or magical incantations of words, but simple Logic, called Judgment, and also called assertion and denial.
For if you had understood that, you would have dedicated yourself to helping to establish factually correct school books, instead of parroting the nonsense in them.

[SpheresOfBalance]

<rate absspeed="-1"> <volume level="40"/> <VOICE REQUIRED="NAME=Charles16" >
<Anti-Semitism.docx Statistics:
Words - 924
Characters - 4.073
Paragraphs - 24
Sentences - 52
Sentences per Paragraph - 2.6
Words per Sentence - 17.2
Characters per Word - 4.2
Flesch Reading Ease - 67.4
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level - 8.1
Passive Sentences - 28.69>

Anti-Semitism or anti any culture or belief is anti-understanding the truth of humanity on planet earth. It's ignorance supreme.

Is it on par with being ignorant that all information is processed in binary, which means all grammar systems are founded not in axioms, Or magical incantations of words, but simple Logic, called Judgment, and also called assertion and denial.
For if you had understood that, you would have dedicated yourself to helping to establish factually correct school books, instead of parroting the nonsense in them.

Grow up Phil8659!

I'm no English major. When I went to university, after passing the entrance exam, I was told that in English, I excelled in "Reading Comprehension". I'm certainly no writer. And have you ever thought to consider time and age, It could be that I've forgotten more that you'll ever know.

Time waits for no one my friend, get a clue. But I understand your NEED for retribution. I was that way too, when I was new, but then I turned the page, it's called age.

[Phil8659]

Time waits for no one my friend, get a clue. But I understand your NEED for retribution. I was that way too, when I was new, but then I turned the page, it's called age.

LMAO. I was not told, mine came as a result of a state I.Q. test when I was in the 6th grade.
Someone lied to you, everything you said in your post, testifies to your comprehension.
You are watching birds fly over head, and simply saying "f u c king pigeons.?

But thanks for the joke none the less.
By the way, look up the word refutation, it might help you understand your mistake.

I find it rather curious, for someone to claim that they had any level of comprehension, while claiming Socrates, Plato, Euclid, the definition of a thing, Their own computer, even their own biology was wrong, and they should all "grow up." like a five year old. Practice your arguments on your computer, and record what it tells you, or, argue with your own hand as you practice geometry. See if your self flattery changes any result at all.

And if you want, you can even study the works of Aristotle, and you will find he tells you point blank, thee are two, and only two parts of speech, and that it is the foundation of definition, itself, just like Plato.