Raymond Tallis argues against theist arguments in PN 99.
https://philosophynow.org/issues/101/Taking_Issue_with_The_God_Issue
Taking Issue with The God Issue
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Taking Issue with The God Issue
42 aside, I believe that the lack of faith is a luxury
-Imp
-Imp
Re: Taking Issue with The God Issue
I'm curious.Impenitent wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 12:47 pm 42 aside, I believe that the lack of faith is a luxury
-Imp
Why resurrect this old issue?
What do you mean by 'the lack of faith is a luxury'?
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Taking Issue with The God Issue
I didn't resurrect a thingamity_blu wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 3:34 pmI'm curious.Impenitent wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 12:47 pm 42 aside, I believe that the lack of faith is a luxury
-Imp
Why resurrect this old issue?
What do you mean by 'the lack of faith is a luxury'?
after re-reading the article, I merely mentioned another belief
-Imp
Re: Taking Issue with The God Issue
How interesting.Impenitent wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 5:15 pm
after re-reading the article, I merely mentioned another belief
-Imp
Re: Taking Issue with The God Issue
Now, if we use common math. both sides have issue, which may then be deleted and we have.Philosophy Now wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 9:44 am Raymond Tallis argues against theist arguments in PN 99.
https://philosophynow.org/issues/101/Ta ... _God_Issue
Taking with the God.
Just as much a sentence fragment as an incomplete thought.
Do people really believe that taking an issue, which does not belong to you, is justice? Or that each time one uses common grammar, we have an issue, even an issue pandemic?
Exactly what is the God issue?