Sex and the Religious-Left

[Wizard22]

Just about sums it up:

Go away, you beastly little man.

Beastly, Sinister, you're working your way up to Evil, Hairball... but who's the one pretending "It Isn't Going To Lick Itself" is referring to... what, ice cream???

You're sick.

[Wizard22]

Looks like the post has been deleted. Not sure what it was but it must have been a nasty one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXRREWLP62I

Just watch the video, Gary, it's worth the watch...

[Wizard22]

"Monogamy is not for everybody, in fact, it is actually for very few sections of Humanity (the Aristocracy, Royalty, Nobility)"

Bro what r u talking about? It's those guys who had the most shorties on the side, not the plebs. The elites only practice monogamy for family inheritance and bloodline, but the males sure af weren't and aren't monogamous sexually. Permiscuity is like a privilege. These guys got bitches on speed dial, bruh.

That's just your mind at work, prom. Your head isn't in the right place, in trying to understand Monogamy. It's obviously antithetical to your perspective of the world.

Loyalty, Trust, Confidence, these aren't things you value or understand with respect to others. That's why you're a loner—selfishness.

Relationships require self-sacrifice, selflessness.

[Harbal]

Just about sums it up:

Go away, you beastly little man.

Beastly, Sinister, you're working your way up to Evil, Hairball... but who's the one pretending "It Isn't Going To Lick Itself" is referring to... what, ice cream???

You're sick.

I'm certainly sick of you, you little sewer rat.

[Wizard22]

I'm certainly sick of you, you little sewer rat.

Keep em' comin Hairball, you're exposed. And,

It Ain't Gonna Lick Itself!

[promethean75]

"That's why you're a loner—selfishness."

No imma loner becuz I'm stigmatized (nobody likes me) and I'm antisocial and have bad people skillz becuz of it. I reject others before i can be rejected becuz I'm terrified of being unwanted. I'm developmentally and emotionally arrested becuz of traumatic experiences in relationships. i often aks myself should i ever love again, can i ever love again.

[Wizard22]

and have bad people skillz becuz of it.

Bullshit, you're a snake-charmer, 18 Charisma starting points prom.

You're just paranoid because of your criminal record, since it hits your confidence and interrupts what you do best.

[promethean75]

That's fuckin exactly what it is.

It's like I've lost my mojo or sumthin. I'm even afraid of not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign before turning.

[Wizard22]

That's fuckin exactly what it is.

It's like I've lost my mojo or sumthin. I'm even afraid of not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign before turning.

Obviously you have some PTSD...

Let me give you some advice, prom, from my natural 18 Intelligence score. When you meet somebody you like or a potential long-term business opportunity, try to drop it nonchalantly that you're on the sex offender registry. Casually say something like, "Yeah back in 20xx, I got hit with sex offense charges...sucks man, because I was into exhibition with some woman, and a kid accidentally saw me, fucked my whole shit up. ...also, I had a 17-year-old girlfriend back when I was 38. Man it sucked, but learned my lessons, STILL PAYING FOR IT!...anywho, what kind of dimensions you looking for with this gazebo??"

You should hit most people with this up front, so they don't feel 'blindsided' by it later. Also, go two-for-one with the major cases, since a person who looks you up, you don't want them thinking that you "held back" from your history that's easy to find publicly.

Most people are going to browse quick, confirm what you say, and move on. At that point, they'll either accept or deny you. But what you DO NOT WANT, is people "figuring it out on their own". That's when the real animosity comes in, betrayal.

[promethean75]

"also, I had a 17-year-old girlfriend back when I was 38"

That's actually a myth. I heard another myth that I was seventy three when that happened.

Actual age of the retail price is!

32

[Wizard22]

"also, I had a 17-year-old girlfriend back when I was 38"

That's actually a myth. I heard another myth that I was seventy three when that happened.

Actual age of the retail price is!

32

...seems like forever ago... no offense prom, I'm not remembering your birthday.

[promethean75]

"You should hit most people with this up front, so they don't feel 'blindsided' by it later"

That's exactly what u don't do; (a) u don't offer the information that you're a SO becuz there's a good chance the person wuzzint gonna want a background check and now they know only becuz u told em. Now you've blown it and u don't get the work.

But this comes with a price. In the case that u don't tell them, and they don't tell u they know you're an SO (if in fact they do), they'll never aks u about the crimes and assume u did some heinous shit. In this case, u would rather tell them all about the crimes than let them continue assuming you're a rapist or child molester. But, becuz of A, u can't do that (becuz u don't know that they know and wouldn't want to tell them if they didn't)

U have no idea how indescribably frustrating having to go through this is, bro.

[Alexis Jacobi]

Looks like the post has been deleted. Not sure what it was but it must have been a nasty one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXRREWLP62I

Just watch the video, Gary, it's worth the watch...

Those who pay attention -- I wager that no one of those Terrible Opponents who write in these threads does -- to current events know that there is developing, and there has developed, a political and cultural position that is hard to categorize but let's call it Dissident Right for the sake of simplicity.

Nick Fuentes is one such person and personality. But there are numerous others. Fuentes, E. Michael Jones, Alain de Benoist, as well as those who, like Tucker Carlson and Jordan Peterson are close enough to the political center to still be *considerable* (and to remain un-cancelled), whereas people like Fuentes are definitely excluded and regarded as beyond the pale.

The long and the short of it (oh dear, that opens up to a terrible pun) is that Fuentes offers a view, an opinion, a perspective, that is entirely valid. However, in those processes of transvaluation of values that we all have experienced in the last decades (hard to say what the start date was but it is convenient to refer to the Sixties) what was once seen, universally, as bad, unclean, ugly, unnatural, and which was shunned, has now been transvalued into something normal, non-bad, and simply a matter of choice like what flavor of ice cream one likes and which one doesn't.

Since I see where Fuentes is coming from, and I agree with his perspective, I refer again to my central assertion: homosexuality and all deviant sexual expressions should be seen as weird, unnatural, not *good* and not equal to heterosexual sexuality. And as such their representations should be shunned, not advertised, not placed on the same value-plane as heterosexual sexuality, etc.

It is hard to say how far a developing conservatism will actually go, or how far it could go. There are people out there with challenging and radical ideas and they are making inroads. That is unquestionable. These are civil conflicts and as such they will not simply settle down.

[Wizard22]

"You should hit most people with this up front, so they don't feel 'blindsided' by it later"

That's exactly what u don't do; (a) u don't offer the information that you're a SO becuz there's a good chance the person wuzzint gonna want a background check and now they know only becuz u told em. Now you've blown it and u don't get the work.

But this comes with a price. In the case that u don't tell them, and they don't tell u they know you're an SO (if in fact they do), they'll never aks u about the crimes and assume u did some heinous shit. In this case, u would rather tell them all about the crimes than let them continue assuming you're a rapist or child molester. But, becuz of A, u can't do that (becuz u don't know that they know and wouldn't want to tell them if they didn't)

U have no idea how indescribably frustrating having to go through this is, bro.

When you meet somebody you like or a potential long-term business opportunity,

I meant on the condition that you want a long-lasting association with somebody, but then again, you don't strike me as the type who wants long-term associations.

[Wizard22]

Those who pay attention -- I wager that no one of those Terrible Opponents who write in these threads does -- to current events know that there is developing, and there has developed, a political and cultural position that is hard to categorize but let's call it Dissident Right for the sake of simplicity.

Nick Fuentes is one such person and personality. But there are numerous others. Fuentes, E. Michael Jones, Alain de Benoist, as well as those who, like Tucker Carlson and Jordan Peterson are close enough to the political center to still be *considerable* (and to remain un-cancelled), whereas people like Fuentes are definitely excluded and regarded as beyond the pale.

The long and the short of it (oh dear, that opens up to a terrible pun) is that Fuentes offers a view, an opinion, a perspective, that is entirely valid. However, in those processes of transvaluation of values that we all have experienced in the last decades (hard to say what the start date was but it is convenient to refer to the Sixties) what was once seen, universally, as bad, unclean, ugly, unnatural, and which was shunned, has now been transvalued into something normal, non-bad, and simply a matter of choice like what flavor of ice cream one likes and which one doesn't.

Since I see where Fuentes is coming from, and I agree with his perspective, I refer again to my central assertion: homosexuality and all deviant sexual expressions should be seen as weird, unnatural, not *good* and not equal to heterosexual sexuality. And as such their representations should be shunned, not advertised, not placed on the same value-plane as heterosexual sexuality, etc.

It is hard to say how far a developing conservatism will actually go, or how far it could go. There are people out there with challenging and radical ideas and they are making inroads. That is unquestionable. These are civil conflicts and as such they will not simply settle down.

It's not even necessarily the "Dissident-Right".

Here's Pearl Davis:
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQZRN1C536g)

I believe that this phase of polyamory and 'Femdom' comes naturally after post-great war victories. When Empires defeat their main rivalry (America and USSR beat Europe in the 1940s), then a period of 'Liberalism' occurs: sex, drugs, rock'n'roll, non-stop parties (1960-1999). Woodstock are examples of these Celebrations and Victories. The "problem" is, however, that the party doesn't last forever. And the Boomers don't realize this, even while they're dying-out. Their children, Gen X, Y, Z, were all instructed and indoctrinated with these 'Liberal' values, and are convinced that the "good times" will continue forever.

But Westerners are finally waking-up and coming to the realization, that the Party was over two decades ago, and the Dark Times are coming.

...they're already here. The Boomers (like Hairball here), are a perfect representation of somebody who lives in the past, lives in the 90s or 00s, ignorant and blind to what's already been happening, or happening right now.


This is why Hairball is forced into the corner that "It Isn't Going To Lick Itself", with children in front of a drag show, means "ice cream" to him. He's forced into a Big Lie that he cannot defend. And he turns into an uppity little ****, when forced into these admissions.


Therefore, the "Dissident-Right" is actually the symptom of these trends of Degeneration and extinguished Hedonism. They are the Result of these coming Times, not the 'Cause' of them per se. Liberal-Leftists, however, the Religious-Left, need Scapegoats, and they've worked over time since 2016 to make the "MAGA" movement into such social pariahs and scapegoats.

Problem is...the Conservative-Right in America, were the ones to actually defeat Hitler and Nazis in 1945. They were the ones who fought the Vietnam War. They were the ones who were misled into Bush's Iraq Wars... so Liberals don't understand or realize who they are making (Domestic) enemies of.