My epitaph

[Age]

I don't know. I have been to a forum or two that catered to military personnel. I told them in one that we shouldn't be fighting wars that Congress hasn't officially declared. Some of them got pissed and a few others seemed to agree. They didn't kick me off. I started to feel badly for the consternation I was causing and so I haven't been there in a while and I have forgotten the web address but it had something to do with military personnel. Since Age seems to have no problem with annoying people, maybe he would last longer than I did?

But you said relevant things. I imagine Age would start shouting that militaries and Congresses don't actually exist, they are just making all that stuff up, which makes them evil etc. and then she would get banned.

Well, that's because Age is not speaking in ways that s/he could best communicate what needs to be communicated. Hopefully, s/he will improve over time.

BUT, JUST MAYBE I am communicating IN WAYS that ARE BEING BEST COMMUNICATE TO 'those' who MY WRITINGS ARE ACTUALLY INTENDED FOR, EXACTLY.

We WILL just HAVE TO WAIT, TO SEE.

[Age]

2. Now, the PROOF that the earth is NO flat, that the earth revolves around the sun, that there is ONLY One Mind, that there IS Intelligence existing within 'you', human beings, that the Universe did NOT begin, that the Universe is NOT expanding, and/or that the Universe IS infinite AND eternal, has ALWAYS been HERE, and NOW. That 'you', human beings, do NOT individually COME-TO-SEE and RECOGNIZE these IRREFUTABLE Facts ALL AT ONCE, IS EXTREMELY OBVIOUS. But, what is ALSO JUST AS OBVIOUS is that PROOF and Facts do NOT just COME-INTO-BEING. 'They' ARE ALWAYS HERE, for EVERY one TO LOOK AT, and SEE.

Well good for you, that looks like material worth at least 5 Nobel prizes. I envy your wisdom.

What can be CLEARLY SEEN here, ONCE AGAIN, is that 'money' and/or 'prizes' were a CONSTANT 'driver' for the adult human being, BACK in the days when this was being written.

Which is ANOTHER reason WHY it took 'them' SO LONG to PROGRESS, and ADVANCE FORWARD.

[Flannel Jesus]

How long has he been waiting for already to find those who his writing style is geared towards? How long will he wait? Where did you come from cotton eye Joe?

[Age]

But you said relevant things. I imagine Age would start shouting that militaries and Congresses don't actually exist, they are just making all that stuff up, which makes them evil etc. and then she would get banned.

Well, that's because Age is not speaking in ways that s/he could best communicate what needs to be communicated. Hopefully, s/he will improve over time.

No, she literally means that people don't have their own minds and are just making the problems of the world up.

Well WHO ELSE COULD BE 'making the problems'?

Also, what ACTUAL so-called 'problems of the world' are 'you' ACTUALLY talking ABOUT or REFERRING TO here, "atla"?

[Age]

Well, that's because Age is not speaking in ways that s/he could best communicate what needs to be communicated. Hopefully, s/he will improve over time.

No, she literally means that people don't have their own minds and are just making the problems of the world up.

That part I haven't paid attention to, if that's what s/he's saying. I mostly notice Age constantly posting that "you [us] adult human beings" are causing all the world's problems.

'human beings' do usually ONLY NOTICE and SEE what 'it' IS that 'they' WANT TO SEE, and NOTICE, and especially 'the older' ones, in the days when this is being written.

[Gary Childress]

No, she literally means that people don't have their own minds and are just making the problems of the world up.

That part I haven't paid attention to, if that's what s/he's saying. I mostly notice Age constantly posting that "you [us] adult human beings" are causing all the world's problems.

'human beings' do usually ONLY NOTICE and SEE what 'it' IS that 'they' WANT TO SEE, and NOTICE, and especially 'the older' ones, in the days when this is being written.

Whatever, Age. If you're writing for posterity, Age, then I have no idea why. If you're an "adult human" also, then there's no more reason for posterity to listen to you than it would be for them to listen to me or many others. You'd just better hope that there is a posterity to read this. Many of us "adult human beings" are trying to save posterity.

[Age]

No, she literally means that people don't have their own minds and are just making the problems of the world up.

That part I haven't paid attention to, if that's what s/he's saying. I mostly notice Age constantly posting that "you [us] adult human beings" are causing all the world's problems.

Yeah but by 'you adult human beings' she neither means you, nor adult human beings, because she has no conception that such things exist.

What can be SEEN here, VERY CLEARLY, then WHEN one OBTAINS A BELIEF, then 'that one' can BECOME ABSOLUTELY CLOSED OFF to ANY 'thing' that OPPOSES or IS NOT 'that BELIEF'.

'This one' has become SO CLOSED that it ACTUALLY 'currently now' BELIEVING that when I USE the ' 'you', adult human beings ', words that I do NOT MEAN 'you', adult human beings, BECAUSE 'I' have ABSOLUTELY NO CONCEPTION AT ALL that 'you', adult human beings, do ACTUALLY EXIST.

Also, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that 'this one' IS PROVING IRREFUTABLY True ABOUT how WHEN one is HOLDING ONTO A BELIEF, then 'that one' WILL say just about ANY 'thing', in the HOPE that 'those words' WILL, or MIGHT JUST, back up and support 'their' OWN CREATED BELIEF.

MAYBE 'this one' THINKS, or BELIEVES, that 'I' am just, literally, 'talking to' AND 'responding BACK to' NON existing 'things'. We WILL just HAVE TO WAIT, TO DISCOVER, and SEE.

[Gary Childress]

@Atla: New theory about, Age. He's an adult human being who knows very well what he is doing.

[Age]

That part I haven't paid attention to, if that's what s/he's saying. I mostly notice Age constantly posting that "you [us] adult human beings" are causing all the world's problems.

Yeah but by 'you adult human beings' she neither means you, nor adult human beings, because she has no conception that such things exist.

If s/he doesn't believe that adult human beings exist, then who is s/he addressing with statements like "you adult humans"? I took her/him to be saying that its adult human beings who are causing all the problems.

What can be CLEARLY SEEN here IS the POWER OF 'belief'. That is; WHEN one BELIEVES SO STRONGLY that some 'thing' IS TRUE, no matter how STUPID or False the BELIEF REALLY IS, when 'that one' CONVEYS 'that BELIEF' along ONTO and INTO "others", then 'they' PAST 'it' ON in such a way that 'unsuspecting' "others" can all TO QUICKLY, SIMPLY, and EASILY START TO BEGIN TO BELIEVE that what the "other" IS SAYING is true.

Just so 'you' BECOME AWARE "gary childress" "atla" 'grew up' to become such a GOOD 'deceiver' that 'it' ACTUALLY STARTED BELIEVING 'its' OWN 'deceptions' and LIES.

Now. there is NO A SINGLE WORD in ABSOLUTELY ANY of my posts that even is REMOTELY CLOSE to me even JUST SUGGESTING that adult NOR children human beings do NOT exist.

"atla" just KNOWS that if 'it' CONTINUES ON WITH 'this DEFLECTION' for LONG ENOUGH, then "others" WILL BECOME DECEIVED INTO BELIEVING that 'I' HAVE.

And by the way "gary childress", I HAVE BEEN SAYING that, ONLY, 'you', adult human beings, CAUSE and ARE DOING ALL OF the Wrong DOING in 'the world'.

Whereas, NOT just 'you', adults, cause ALL of the 'problems' but so to DO children. But there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Wrong with 'this' BECAUSE of just what the word 'problem' MEANS and REFERS TO, TO 'me'.

[Age]

Since you've been stating it incorrectly,

What is the 'it' word here REFERRING TO, EXACTLY?

What have I, SUPPOSEDLY, been stating INCORRECTLY, EXACTLY?

what should I assume?

Here we have ANOTHER GREAT example of just HOW MUCH 'these people', BACK THEN were NOT LISTENING, and NOT HEARING.

How many times have I suggested that if one Truly WANTS TO LEARN some 'thing' MORE, or ANEW, then it is ALWAYS BEST TO NOT BE ASSUMING ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing'?

So, BASED ON the Fact that I have BEEN CONTINUALLY SUGGESTING that it IS BEST to NEVER ASSUME ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing' AT ALL, EVER, then ASKING 'me' in regards to what 'you' SHOULD 'assume', just SHOWS and PROVES how LITTLE of what I have been SAYING here gets even RECOGNIZED, let alone HEARD and UNDERSTOOD.

Should I assume you're a basket case and of no good in this world? Or should I assume that you have a valid message but are unable to communicate it properly to many people on this forum.

ONCE AGAIN, 'you' ARE ABSOLUTELY FREE to CHOOSE TO THINK or DO ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing' 'you' LIKE or WANT TO.

If EVERYTHING is an assumption, then how can one NOT assume?

BUT who SAID or CLAIMED that 'EVERYTHING' IS an 'assumption'?

And, WHAT are 'they' even BASING 'this' CLAIM, and ASSUMPTION, ON, EXACTLY?

Also, CAN ASSUMPTIONS BE False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect?

If yes, then, OBVIOUSLY, the ASSUMPTION that 'EVERYTHING is an assumption' could ALSO BE False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect, AS WELL.

[Age]

Yeah but by 'you adult human beings' she neither means you, nor adult human beings, because she has no conception that such things exist.

If s/he doesn't believe that adult human beings exist, then who is s/he addressing with statements like "you adult humans"? I took her/him to be saying that its adult human beings who are causing all the problems.

There is no 'she/he' either, who would be making the statements.
Good question. Looks like she has a pre-theory-of-mind experience where there is just this jumble of voices and texts that don't belong to anyone. Looks like she can sort of localize some of them to what we consider 'human beings', but this is something very different from what we are familiar with.

'This one' IS 'now' SO LOST and TOTALLY CONFUSED that 'it' HAS EVEN COMPLETELY and UTTERLY BAFFLED "its" OWN 'self'

[Atla]

@Atla: New theory about, Age. He's an adult human being who knows very well what he is doing.

In her own world she knows what she's doing, which is: in her disabled pre-theory-of-mind world, where there are only texts/voices from the bodies of automatic human beings and God speaking through those bodies, she is trying to make us realize that if we all harness this inner Godly voice and all come into sync, then we can simply mentally create an utopia together. And this will inevitably happen in the future, and she's here on this forum to demonstrate how retarded 'human beings' were back in the day before they became enlightened and synchronized.

But her whole theory is complete bullshit. There is some more to her theory that she won't reveal, but it doesn't matter much either as it's already complete bullshit. Her theory isn't even new, it's one of the oldest ones in the book.

[Age]

Oh, and by the way, WHICH 'country' HAS stocked up on, and HOLDS the MOST, 'destructive things'?

In terms of material, right now China is outpacing the US in military build-up, but the US has outpaced others for decades.

HOW do 'you' KNOW, WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY, that the country called "china" is so-called 'outpacing' another country?

Does it even matter at this point who is doing it the "most"?

It is a pretty EASY 'thing' TO ASK WHEN one just happens to be living IN the country WITH 'the MOST', some might say.

EVERYONE needs to just stop.

How ABOUT 'the country' WITH 'the MOST' STOPS FIRST. Would 'that' be FAIR ENOUGH?

[Gary Childress]

@Atla: New theory about, Age. He's an adult human being who knows very well what he is doing.

In her own world she knows what she's doing, which is: in her disabled pre-theory-of-mind world, where there are only texts/voices from the bodies of automatic human beings and God speaking through those bodies, she is trying to make us realize that if we all harness this inner Godly voice and all come into sync, then we can simply mentally create an utopia together. And this will inevitably happen in the future, and she's here on this forum to demonstrate how retarded 'human beings' were back in the day before they became enlightened and synchronized.

But her whole theory is complete bullshit. There is some more to her theory that she won't reveal, but it doesn't matter much either as it's already complete bullshit. Her theory isn't even new, it's one of the oldest ones in the book.

Well, Atla you look at it sympathetically. You have the patience of Job (as some say), I'm not particularly keen on Age's posts or think they're going to solve anything either but I'll leave Age to his beliefs. I've already had one psychosis centering around doomsday from reading Age's posts, "back in the days this was written". I'm sure it will not be the last, I just hope those psychoses bear no truth or relevance to the future.

[Age]

How old are you, Age? I recall asking if you were an adult and you replied that you are. Am I mistaken?

WHEN does 'one' BECOME a so-called 'adult' TO 'you', "gary childress"?

And, out of curiosity would it REALLY MATTER either way?

Are you over the age of 21?

What can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that one QUESTION gets ANSWERED, but NOT the OTHER one.

Also, what is VERY NOTICEABLE here is that BACK in 'those days' even though there were MANY UPON MANY 'things' that 'these people' would BICKER and/or FIGHT ABOUT, as can be CLEARLY SEEN here in these writings, 'the people' could NOT even AGREE UPON, of ALL 'things', WHEN A 'child' BECAME AN 'adult'.

'They', literally, had NO CLUE as to WHEN, EXACTLY, A 'child' BECAME AN 'adult', and thus the VERY REASON WHY there WAS SO MUCH CONFUSION, FIGHTING, and DISAGREEING OVER WHO was and was NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR 'what', EXACTLY?