What is that irrelevant segue on behalf of? Are you trying to argue that some races are genetically superior in some mental categories than others or are you just trying to hint at it without daring to actually say it?Wizard22 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:34 amI commend you on your baiting skills...FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 1:35 pmSo in this instance you offer no causal role for race at all and attribute everything to culture. Remember you are the one who instriduced True racisms, so you need to assign a causal role to actual races.
I offered you "many" reasons but the one I chose was reinforcement of selected traits, particularly intelligence and IQ. The implication of this is sexual preference and mate-selection. In other words, women sexually desire a trait (choose any one: height, physique, intelligence, wealth, social status, race, religion, etc.) and then children are produced by these Causes. This reinforces the original trait, therefore the original Cause. The problem and drawback of single-trait selection though, is that it produces anomalies which cannot survive of their own volition: Savantism, Autism, Neuroticism, Schizophrenia and other forms of Socio/Psycho/Pathologies. In other words, polymaths can be produced, but they can be so socially autistic and anti-social as to then not reproduce themselves.
Word salad. You are tasked with explaining how this evidence demonstrates that white people are more attractive than non white people, and you are providing no objective measurement to support your interpretation of already unimpressive data.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:34 am1) It is factual information.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 1:35 pmWhat factual assertion are you promoting? That on a dating site where most of the users are white those users statistically are more likely to match to other white people? Amateurish shit.
2) A higher preponderance of "white" online-dating users, does not infer that they would be racially favored by non-white Users.
So you're wrong on both accounts. You still need to explain for why whites outperform other races in general dating desirability.
You were supposed to be explaining how you corrected for externalities to arrive at the conclusion that testosterone is the primary cause of violence. You didn't even attempt to do that. The claim cannot stand.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:34 amI studied Anthropology for about a decade. Testosterone is an obvious tell because it produces 'Sexual Dimorphism' in races which alters appearance. This is why, for example, in East Asians, males and females tend to look more 'similar' to each-other than compared to high-testosterone ethnicities and groups. This is as obvious as very large Height differences between males and females.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 1:35 pmHow did you statistically correct for externalities to arrive at that testosterone claim? I'm not so much concerned about the claim that testosterone levels vary between races, but the claim that this variance is more important than those other factors is unsupported. You are finally assigning a causal role to race here, you must show that you are capable of doing that work.
Which race on Earth has the highest difference of tall male to short female on the extremes?
Answer:
White Europeans (Dutch-Danish-Scandinavians) and,
Black Americans (basketball players).
So this implies a larger than average Testosterone average in these groups of males.
