is trans genocide a thing?

[phyllo]

Not sure what that mythical being is, but I do know what a man is, although apparently hardly anyone knows what a woman is any more (or isn't allowed to say).

A woman is a non-man.

[Iwannaplato]

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Thanks Iwannaplato for teaching me how to do this!
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Glad (and surprised) it pleased someone.

[Wizard22]

K: I would love to hear exactly what moral values you are talking about??
please name them... what morals are "western" and constitute
the values you are referring to?

Kropotkin

What is a woman?

[Peter Kropotkin]

K: I would love to hear exactly what moral values you are talking about??
please name them... what morals are "western" and constitute
the values you are referring to?

Kropotkin

What is a woman?

K: so, you have no answer as to what moral values are and why
they are specifically western values.... good to know...

Kropotkin

[Wizard22]

K: so, you have no answer as to what moral values are and why
they are specifically western values.... good to know...

Kropotkin

There can be no morals when you don't know the difference between a man and woman.

[Gary Childress]

Taking the life of or committing violence to another human being is a violation of our own well-being, including that of the perpetrator. I don't know if there is a "trans-genocide" any more than there is a serial killer genocide or a mistaken philosopher genocide. However, I have heard that men who pose, pretend, or act like a female suffer violence at the hands of other males to a greater extent than males who follow the 'natural' (using "natural" in the sense of opposed to a 'wrong' or 'incorrect') development path. Committing violence to a person who thinks or acts lke a female is as wrong as violating the fundamental well-being of any other person.

What I disagree with is the notion of taking children and making perhaps permanent changes to their 'natural' (I use 'natural' here in the sense of opposed to non-artificial or non-man-made) or 'biological' development. To me, that is irresponsible, mistaken, risky, and wrong. If a young male wants to act like a girl, then they can do what they want, however, they cannot become a girl in the same way that a girl is a girl. And changing a person's hormones and such is a radical tampering or interference with what our bodies naturally/biologically do. Who knows what side effects one might suffer as a result? Who knows if the person will always spend their life wanting to be the opposite sex? It could equally be a phase that a person is going through. Therefore, such a "transition" should only be consented to by a fully cognizant adult who is made aware of the possible consequences or ramifications of such a "transition", not children.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Taking the life of or committing violence to another human being is a violation of our own well-being, including that of the perpetrator. I don't know if there is a "trans-genocide" any more than there is a serial killer genocide or a mistaken philosopher genocide. However, I have heard that men who pose, pretend, or act like a female suffer violence at the hands of other males to a greater extent than males who follow the 'natural' (using "natural" in the sense of opposed to a 'wrong' or 'incorrect') development path. Committing violence to a person who thinks or acts lke a female is as wrong as violating the fundamental well-being of any other person.

What I disagree with is the notion of taking children and making perhaps permanent changes to their 'natural' (I use 'natural' here in the sense of opposed to non-artificial or non-man-made) or 'biological' development. To me, that is irresponsible, mistaken, risky, and wrong. If a young male wants to act like a girl, then they can do what they want, however, they cannot become a girl in the same way that a girl is a girl. And changing a person's hormones and such is a radical tampering or interference with what our bodies naturally/biologically do. Who knows what side effects one might suffer as a result? Who knows if the person will always spend their life wanting to be the opposite sex? It could equally be a phase that a person is going through. Therefore, such a "transition" should only be consented to by a fully cognizant adult who is made aware of the possible consequences or ramifications of such a "transition", not children.

Oh really? What exactly is 'thinking' and 'acting' like a female? And that's not what those dipshits mean by 'genocide'. They are abusing the word for dramatic effect. More than 99% of violent crime is committed by MEN against WOMEN, and so-called 'transwomen' make up a disproportionate percentage of people in prison for violent crime.
I can't even be bothered explaining what exactly they mean by 'genocide' because it's too fucking bat-shit insane to even think about.

[Gary Childress]

Taking the life of or committing violence to another human being is a violation of our own well-being, including that of the perpetrator. I don't know if there is a "trans-genocide" any more than there is a serial killer genocide or a mistaken philosopher genocide. However, I have heard that men who pose, pretend, or act like a female suffer violence at the hands of other males to a greater extent than males who follow the 'natural' (using "natural" in the sense of opposed to a 'wrong' or 'incorrect') development path. Committing violence to a person who thinks or acts lke a female is as wrong as violating the fundamental well-being of any other person.

What I disagree with is the notion of taking children and making perhaps permanent changes to their 'natural' (I use 'natural' here in the sense of opposed to non-artificial or non-man-made) or 'biological' development. To me, that is irresponsible, mistaken, risky, and wrong. If a young male wants to act like a girl, then they can do what they want, however, they cannot become a girl in the same way that a girl is a girl. And changing a person's hormones and such is a radical tampering or interference with what our bodies naturally/biologically do. Who knows what side effects one might suffer as a result? Who knows if the person will always spend their life wanting to be the opposite sex? It could equally be a phase that a person is going through. Therefore, such a "transition" should only be consented to by a fully cognizant adult who is made aware of the possible consequences or ramifications of such a "transition", not children.

Oh really? What exactly is 'thinking' and 'acting' like a female? And that's not what those dipshits mean by 'genocide'. They are abusing the word for dramatic effect. More than 99% of violent crime is committed by MEN against WOMEN, and so-called 'transwomen' make up a disproportionate percentage of people in prison for violent crime.
I can't even be bothered explaining what exactly they mean by 'genocide' because it's too fucking bat-shit insane to even think about.

I'm sorry you feel that way. People are more or less free to do what they want to themselves once they reach a level of maturity where they have a better grasp of the world they grew up in. However, I oppose forcing children to adopt radical transformation of their bodies and I oppose allowing males who appear as female into women's restrooms. At least at this point. What I was saying in the post above (in case you misunderstood) is that there is no more "trans-genocide" than there is a "genocide" with any other group that isn't being systematically murdered. If a group is being systematically murdered (most notorious example being minorities in Nazi Germany), then it is most certainly "genocide". However, if something of that relative form isn't happening to a group, then it may be prejudice or something, but it is not "genocide" at that point.

[phyllo]

More than 99% of violent crime is committed by MEN against WOMEN, and so-called 'transwomen' make up a disproportionate percentage of people in prison for violent crime.

That is incorrect.

Most violent crime is committed by men against other men.

Men are much more likely to be the victims of violence than women.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_crime

Men are at much higher risk of being victims of violent crime than women, while women are more fearful of violent crime.[13][14] This phenomenon is termed by researchers as the "fear of crime gender paradox".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_against_men

[Peter Kropotkin]

K: so, you have no answer as to what moral values are and why
they are specifically western values.... good to know...

Kropotkin

There can be no morals when you don't know the difference between a man and woman.

K: ahhhh, good to know... morals and ethics are gender dependent....
that where everyone has gone wrong for 3000 years... we all thought
that morals/ethics was something outside of gender.... our bad...

Kropotkin

[vegetariantaxidermy]

More than 99% of violent crime is committed by MEN against WOMEN, and so-called 'transwomen' make up a disproportionate percentage of people in prison for violent crime.

That is incorrect.

Most violent crime is committed by men against other men.

Men are much more likely to be the victims of violence than women.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_crime

Men are at much higher risk of being victims of violent crime than women, while women are more fearful of violent crime.[13][14] This phenomenon is termed by researchers as the "fear of crime gender paradox".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_against_men

Ok. There was a graph. It must have been 'sexual violence' then. I think it's pretty obvious that most rapes are by men. But it definitely showed a disportionately high number of so-called 'transwomen' (who should be shown as men anyway) statistically. We have the ridiculous situation now where male rapists (is there any other kind?) are showing up in statistics as 'women'. Misogyny is way out of control.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

K: so, you have no answer as to what moral values are and why
they are specifically western values.... good to know...

Kropotkin

There can be no morals when you don't know the difference between a man and woman.

K: ahhhh, good to know... morals and ethics are gender dependent....
that where everyone has gone wrong for 3000 years... we all thought
that morals/ethics was something outside of gender.... our bad...

Kropotkin

Don't you have a Nazi to study?

[Peter Kropotkin]

There can be no morals when you don't know the difference between a man and woman.

K: ahhhh, good to know... morals and ethics are gender dependent....
that where everyone has gone wrong for 3000 years... we all thought
that morals/ethics was something outside of gender.... our bad...

Kropotkin

Don't you have a Nazi to study?

K: nah, your thoughts have no interest to me...

Kropotkin

[vegetariantaxidermy]

K: ahhhh, good to know... morals and ethics are gender dependent....
that where everyone has gone wrong for 3000 years... we all thought
that morals/ethics was something outside of gender.... our bad...

Kropotkin

Don't you have a Nazi to study?

K: nah, your thoughts have no interest to me...

Kropotkin

Of course they don't. They expose you for the hypocritical, misogynistic egonmanic that you are.

[Wizard22]

K: ahhhh, good to know... morals and ethics are gender dependent....
that where everyone has gone wrong for 3000 years... we all thought
that morals/ethics was something outside of gender.... our bad...

Kropotkin

No, you missed the point.

If you are willing to lie that you don't know the difference between a Man and Woman, then whatever else you say or believe about morality and ethics, are also Lies.

Which they are. You're a compulsive liar, Kropotkin, because you are a Wokie cult member.