Christianity

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: Christianity

Post by Dontaskme »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 11:40 pm Instead of dealing with whatever you say..

And then they'll try to dismiss you entirely, as if whatever you say is simply beneath them, and you don't even count as a human being or a voice..

Not everybody will do that...
Yes, but you do that don't you Mr Can...and you in particular are the expert ''dismisser'' of excellent and great theories/thesis that have often been presented for your perusal many times by yours truly, and from other great minds.

But it seems, unless their model aligns perfectly with your own model, you'll simply dismiss it with immediate effect, even condemning it as incoherent drama and nonsensical babble to boot, which is always your loss.

So you of all people IC... should know what you are talking about... I've quoted you specifically as a reminder, just in case you do not know what I am talking about.
Immanuel Can wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 11:40 pmAnd it makes you wonder...do they even hear themselves....
It's tough at the top isn't it IC ..holding tightly to positions, not being flexible, there are advantages and disadvantages to this ego mentality, if you get my drift.

Have a frustrating day.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: Christianity

Post by Dontaskme »

I know what you're talking about but do you know what I'm talking about.


You're a student of the world, learning every day
Surrounded by these walls
You tell me, "Man, I've been around the block"
But you haven't seen it at all
I don't know, I don't know
I don't know what you're talking about
I don't know, I don't know
I don't know what you're talking about
Confrontations every day
Argue, then we go our separate ways
It's always over as soon as it begins
Know that you're losing when you can't give in
I don't know, I don't know
I don't know what you're talking about
I don't know, I don't know
I don't know what you're talking about
I don't know, I don't know
I don't know, I don't know
You live alone and it's always the same
Talk to yourself when you say that I'm to blame
There's more to life than being right and wrong
There's something in between called getting along
I don't know, I don't know
I don't know what you're talking about
I don't know, I don't know
I don't know what you're talking about
I don't know, I don't know
I don't know what you're talking about
I don't know, I don't know
I don't know what you're talking about
I don't know


That was for Mr Can who can't dance the CAN CAN because he's always trying to be one step ahead of himself.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: Christianity

Post by Dontaskme »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 11:40 pm Then they'll swear at you, and make obscene references, and then abuse you and insult you.
Or they'll ignore you completely, isn't that sucky Mr Can,when you don't even count as a human being or a voice! :roll:

And all the time it was just a silly ''Can Can't'' dance between those that can and those that can not.

Image
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: Christianity

Post by Dontaskme »

Image


Image



Image
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: Christianity

Post by Dontaskme »

Mr Can complains about the DAM theory ..saying: well there's nobody there to have a conversation with anyway, so no one is speaking anyway, so what's the point?

And yet this same person thinks it is perfectly fine to have a relationship with Jesus, you know, that person that does not exist except as a ghostlike image of a person inside Mr Can's brain, who he gives special status to be some body, even if it's all just a pretense that this no body is real some body.


We all know Mr Can thinks Jesus, that dead person with no body is real because he is always following the guys advice, you know that guy who does not exist as a body that Mr Can does not like having conversations with, because according to Mr Can, it's perfectly fine having conversations with ghosts like Jesus.. But hell no, if it's a conversation with no one. The one DAM presents to him.

Jesus “I am the way the truth and the light no one cometh unto the Father except through Me” Mr Can loves this message, the one message that comes from the no body he calls Jesus...but then ignores the one known as DAM because there is no one in that one...and is why Mr Can prefers his own no one...you know that other no one, he calls Jesus :lol:


But then if the DAM ever mentions the ghost person, ..Mr Can then just conveniently switches off from that ghost, prefering to ignore it until he thinks it will go away, but it never goes away does it MR Can..I know you prefer the other no body, you idolise as Jesus...and that's ok, we're all a lil fond of our idolised lil cute no bodies, aren't we Mr Can?

Oh the irony between Mr Cans noggin.
It's Hilarious....oooh, it's just soooo funny, I'm soooo tickled pink, my skin is coming up rosy, oooh, I'm back from the dead. What do you think of me now? :roll:
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: Christianity

Post by Dontaskme »

Immanuel Can wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 11:40 pm
Well, it's always interesting to me how these conversations go.

A conversation requires two things: a person who attempts to make people involved in a conflict come to an agreement: a go-between.

No need for a mediator / middle man ....to know SOURCE... IC

Just saying....your / our philosophy is delusional.

Philosophy is DEAD...or, you do you're own science Mr Can, you do you're own science.

Philosophers have not taken science sufficiently seriously and so Philosophy is no longer relevant to knowledge claims.

Truth seekers implies something is FALSE...you do the math. ONLY YOU.

YOU Can /Not be serious MAN.
Image
Harry Baird
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 4:14 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Harry Baird »

Harry Baird wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 2:28 am
phyllo wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 9:06 pm Objectively. He is psychotic.
Objectively, you don't have the first clue as to what psychosis is.
Oh, I think I get it now. I think you have a "folksy" view of psychosis as "aggressive and violent behaviour". In that sense, you're both right and wrong. You're right that I have been expressing raw aggression (against a fool [ETA: OK, OK, in deference to AJ, again: a subject of nescience], and rightly so). You are wrong that this is definitive of psychosis though. Badly wrong. But I'll leave it to you to do the research to determine that for yourself.
Harry Baird
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 4:14 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Harry Baird »

Dontaskme wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 9:30 am YOU Can /Not be serious MAN.
Image
Oh boy. Who can forget that MAN? What a legend.
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Walker »

.












Immanuel Can wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 2:47 am
Hilarious.

And true.
- If someone just spouts off whatever pops into their noggin’, without giving the words rational consideration, that someone may simply be a mindless medium for evil.

- The root of spontaneous hatred-spewing grows within after being implanted. The potential for hatred-spewing lies dormant and is activated by secondary conditions such as frustration, which is an element of duhkha (samsara, suffering).

- Those on the receiving end of the transmitting spewers get to hear the fruit of the seed that was planted, usually long ago, when the seed host looked differently and was discovering things because of youth.

- For example, many man-haters are actually father-haters, and any man who encounters the man-hater gets to be a simulacron of the hated father, or of some other masculine authority who may have been guilty of nothing more than being the immovable No, (but too often that is not the cause) and so the substitute target of hatred gets splashed with the spew bubbling up from what’s rooted inside the afflicted.

- What I admire about Christians, and Christianity, is the equanimity caused by the perpetual awareness of the Christian view (awareness made possible via Christian means) that naturally elevates human-caused actions such as irrational spewing, into principles of right and wrong that guide skillful-means responses that need not be thought out but arise naturally from compassion, love, and kindness.

- Quite often, the appropriate response is stillness, and silence.

- However, it seems to me that stillness is not always the appropriate Christian response.

- Christian tenets may have a definition, and guidelines, for compassionate responses that don’t indulge spewing, and one guideline that comes to mind is Jesus kicking ass when the money-changers fouled the temple.

- If you give enough rope to someone, sure, eventually they will hang themselves with it. They will run with the hatred until it exhausts them, after they have sprayed graffiti on the temple walls.

- Then being empty and now afraid of the emptiness inside, they will once again contritely seek the refuge of kindness. This can also happen after life kicks all the crap out of them.

- While they are endlessly stagnating in their evolution, anyone in the vicinity gets to choke on their excess rope that caused their own fear and suffering, when they actually did catch a glimpse of emptiness.

- The thing is, some folks are just so stupid that they will go back and forth through that doorway, like some chemically unbalanced bi-polarist until all the allotted breaths of life have been used up repeating the same pointless cycle, always knowing where that road leads and taking comfort in the familiar signposts.

- Permitting and facilitating the exercising of idiocy may benefit humanity as a cautionary tale, but that’s assuming the idiot has a moral governor that divides mental violence from physical violence. As we know, many don’t.

- Bottom line question: Does Christian tolerance in fact feed idiotic responses that could fuel intolerance of Christians in general, an intolerance that could physically manifest upon some unsuspecting simulacron?

- And, correlating to that question …

- Is there anything to be gained from that other religion’s philosophy that essentially says, “You may not love me, but you will fear me.”
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Christianity

Post by henry quirk »

phyllo wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 8:51 pm
henry quirk wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 8:36 pm
I'm not accusing you of anything.
I didn't think you were.
I wanted to discuss a rocket engine technology which had been tested by some Chinese university and they got positive results.
Bring that discussion *here: I'm interested.

*to the forum, not this thread
I think that it was an electromagnetic engine.
Scientists just published a paper saying that the controversial EmDrive produces thrust, even though that defies known laws of physics.

After years of speculation, a maverick research team at NASA’s Johnson Space Center has reached a milestone that many experts thought was impossible. This week, the team formally published their experimental evidence for an electromagnetic propulsion system that could power a spacecraft through the void—without using any kind of propellant.

According to the team, the electromagnetic drive, or EmDrive, converts electricity into thrust simply by bouncing around microwaves in a closed cavity. In theory, such a lightweight engine could one day send a spacecraft to Mars in just 70 days. (Find out why Elon Musk thinks a million people could live on Mars by the 2060s.)

The long-standing catch is that the EmDrive seemingly defies the laws of classical physics, so even if it’s doing what the team claims, scientists still aren’t sure how the thing actually works. Previous reports about the engine have been met with heaping doses of skepticism, with many physicists relegating the EmDrive to the world of pseudoscience.

Now, though, the latest study has passed a level of scrutiny by independent scientists that suggests the EmDrive really does work. Is this the beginning of a revolution in space travel—or just another false start for the “impossible” spaceship engine?
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/scie ... ce-science
Could this still be bunk?

For sure. There’s a long history of findings that seemingly defy the laws of physics (faster-than-light neutrinos, anyone?) that were ultimately shown to be casualties of faulty experimentation.

In this paper, the authors identify and discuss nine potential sources of experimental errors, including rogue air currents, leaky electromagnetic radiation, and magnetic interactions. Not all of them could be completely ruled out, and more experimentation is definitely needed … perhaps next time in space.
From the same article.

But you can't discuss this on some forums. :lol: :cry:
You should open a thread on speculative propulsion. I got things to say on fission/fusion pulse drives (Orion, Daedalus) that would fit there (and piss off the hippies).
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Christianity

Post by henry quirk »

phyllo wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 9:17 pm
henry quirk wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 8:36 pm
I'm not accusing you of anything.
I didn't think you were.
I wanted to discuss a rocket engine technology which had been tested by some Chinese university and they got positive results.
Bring that discussion *here: I'm interested.

*to the forum, not this thread
Thanks for reminding me of this.

I had forgotten how much I enjoyed it.
👍
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Christianity

Post by henry quirk »

phyllo wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 10:48 pm
Alexis Jacobi wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 10:18 pm
phyllo wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 10:00 pmAre you as nuts as he is?
If you would kindly avoid this sort of commentary and resume the conversation in which you also have a role it would, for this participant, be appreciated.
If you think that referring to "contemplating the best bitches worth fucking" is okay they I have to put you in the same category as the others.

What kind of ridiculous forum is this?
The best kind: free wheelin' and (mostly) uncensored.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Christianity

Post by henry quirk »

Immanuel Can wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 2:47 am
Walker wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 12:53 am Image
Hilarious.

And true.
Seconded.
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Walker »

Harry Baird wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 10:08 am
Harry Baird wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 2:28 am
phyllo wrote: Sun Aug 28, 2022 9:06 pm Objectively. He is psychotic.
Objectively, you don't have the first clue as to what psychosis is.
Oh, I think I get it now. I think you have a "folksy" view of psychosis as "aggressive and violent behaviour". In that sense, you're both right and wrong. You're right that I have been expressing raw aggression (against a fool [ETA: OK, OK, in deference to AJ, again: a subject of nescience], and rightly so). You are wrong that this is definitive of psychosis though. Badly wrong. But I'll leave it to you to do the research to determine that for yourself.
That gives rise to a moral and legal question:

If a licensed psychologist (are they even licensed?) fucks with folks on a forum, is that both unethical and punishable?
Harry Baird
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 4:14 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Harry Baird »

Walker wrote: Mon Aug 29, 2022 11:18 am That gives rise to a moral and legal question:

If a licensed psychologist (are they even licensed?) fucks with folks on a forum, is that both unethical and punishable?
Hey Walker,

I'm a relative newcomer despite my registration date, so I'm not sure who the licensed psychologist might be, but from the context it seems that you're suggesting it's phyllo.

I wasn't aware that he held that qualification. If that is the case, then I do think that his ignorance of the definition of psychosis is very unprofessional.

As for "unethical", perhaps so. A professional should not publicly promote falsehoods about matters related to his profession.

As for "punishable", I'm not so sure. It's an interesting question. What do you think?
Post Reply