Is morality objective or subjective?

[Skepdick]

The "default position" per what?

Per everything is different from everything else.

Difference is axiomatic.

"Sameness" is a claim. Justify it.

[Terrapin Station]

The "default position" per what?

Per everything is different from everything else.

Difference is axiomatic.

"Sameness" is a claim. Justify it.

But you're not just saying that they're different words. You're assigning particular properties to them.

[Skepdick]

But you're not just saying that they're different words. You're assigning particular properties to them.

I am not doing anything of that sort.

ANY TWO THINGS (whatever their properties) are different.

If you are asserting "sameness" based on "properties" then justify those too.

[Terrapin Station]

I am not doing anything of that sort.

You wrote "Decisions require information." That's assigning a property to decisions, and it was done in distinction to choices.

[Skepdick]

You wrote "Decisions require information." That's assigning a property to decisions, and it was done in distinction to choices.

No, it isn't. Your interpretation is all fucked up.

Information serves as input to decisions. It's not a property of decisions.

[Terrapin Station]

You wrote "Decisions require information." That's assigning a property to decisions, and it was done in distinction to choices.

No, it isn't. Your hermeneutics are all fucked up.

So no, it's not in distinction from choices?

[Skepdick]

So no, it's not in distinction from choices?

I don't have to distinguish it. They are not the same. Axiomatically.

Information serves as input to decisions. No information -> undecidable.

[Terrapin Station]

So no, it's not in distinction from choices?

I don't have to distinguish it. They are not the same. Axiomatically.

Information serves as input to decisions. No information -> undecidable.

Is the distinction decidable?

[Skepdick]

Is the distinction decidable?

No. It's axiomatic. You don't have to decide.

Any two things are distinct.

[Terrapin Station]

Is the distinction decidable?

No. It's axiomatic. You don't have to decide.

Any two things are distinct.

How are we getting to the "decisions require information" part?

[Skepdick]

How are we getting to the "decisions require information" part?

If you are going to decide "sameness" between X and Y then you have to have a criterion which obtains.

[Terrapin Station]

How are we getting to the "decisions require information" part?

If you are going to decide "sameness" between X and Y then you have to have a criterion which obtains.

Huh? How does that explain why you're writing "decisions require information" ?

[Skepdick]

Huh? How does that explain why you're writing "decisions require information" ?

The criterion which obtains is what is required to make the decision THAT X is "the same" as Y

[Terrapin Station]

Huh? How does that explain why you're writing "decisions require information" ?

The criterion which obtains is what is required to make the decision THAT X is "the same" as Y

What in the world are you talking about? What sameness are you talking about?

[Skepdick]

What in the world are you talking about? What sameness are you talking about?

YOU claimed that "choosing" is "deciding". You claimed sameness.

Provide the criterion which obtains.