Metaphysics.Aetixintro wrote:Besides, who I am may not be an accident at all, but follows beautifully down the family tree of life and genetics, from ancient ancestors to my parents (and to myself) today...
Parallel Universe Reality
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
- Aetixintro
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
Science! 
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
I do not find that the replies here have a basis in either science or academic learning ;so you will excuse me if I take leave of this forum .
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
Was it something we said?
p.s.
scientific metaphysical ethics, pah!
- Aetixintro
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
Agreed, Arising_uk!
PS: Probably badly hidden envy anyhow! Did I mention "probably"...? hi-hi-hi
Last edited by Aetixintro on Sat May 01, 2010 6:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
Also? How come we went from Metaphysics to Phil of Sci? As at least I thought it should be in Applied Ethics meself.Electron wrote:I do not find that the replies here have a basis in either science or academic learning ;so you will excuse me if I take leave of this forum .
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
Envious ! You COMPLETE CRETIN. That's what this site is all about ; fucking ' "pseuds" corner 'Aetixintro wrote:![]()
Agreed, Arising_uk!
PS: Probably badly hidden envy anyhow! Did I mention "probably"...? hi-hi-hi
they should call it . Einstein merely used the moon as an example you fool.
He meant all things .
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
Personally,
I'm still interested in what ethical consequences are involved in such thoughts?
I'm still interested in what ethical consequences are involved in such thoughts?
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
Who would want to debate with you?Arising_uk wrote:Personally,
I'm still interested in what ethical consequences are involved in such thoughts?
You have no original thoughts.
You contribute nothing to expand the intellectual horizon.
You are just a self obsessed pseudo intellectual like your friend.
Deluded and pitiful.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
Electron wrote:Who would want to debate with you?
You have no original thoughts.
You contribute nothing to expand the intellectual horizon.
You are just a self obsessed pseudo intellectual like your friend.
Deluded and pitiful.
Whose asking for a debate? I'm still waiting for what you think the ethical consequences are with respect to the thoughts of these physicists? As you said there were some.
-
i blame blame
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:26 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
The many worlds interpretation is not the only alternative to the Copenhagen one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpreta ... _mechanicsElectron wrote:It now appears to be the case that Hugh Everett III offers the only alternative to
The Copenhagen Interpretation .
The Double Slit Experiment confirms Superposition of the particle in all possible states.
This has been accepted by the academic world and now the upshot is ,that we exist independently, in many different scenarios , in a multiple universe
condition.
This has implications for ethics ,since we will take a number of routes and exist with each separate outcome.
Anyone who replies to this post will reply, will not reply ,will reply in support ,will reply with conjecture and all these variable states exist in an embodied form in a real universe.
The "we" in another universe wouldn't actually be "us". They'd be a very similar person, but not identical to us, as they have had different experiences. As we move forward in time, these differences accumulate.
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
So being called a TIT is familiar to you ? Yes I guess it is.Arising_uk wrote:Electron wrote:Who would want to debate with you?
You have no original thoughts.
You contribute nothing to expand the intellectual horizon.
You are just a self obsessed pseudo intellectual like your friend.
Deluded and pitiful.You sound familiar?
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
The "we" would be identical in every detail. The only difference is the change of circumstances.i blame blame wrote:
The "we" in another universe wouldn't actually be "us". They'd be a very similar person, but not identical to us, as they have had different experiences. As we move forward in time, these differences accumulate.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
As wanker must be for you, but are you going to get around to saying what these ethical implications are? Or have you already done so in another world?Electron wrote:So being called a TIT is familiar to you ? Yes I guess it is.
-
i blame blame
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:26 am
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: Parallel Universe Reality
So, not every detail. An essential part of personal identity is one's experiences. Different circumstances make different people.Electron wrote: The "we" would be identical in every detail. The only difference is the change of circumstances.