As I just wrote in another thread to you. It does NOT matter if I write one or a hundred questions to you in a post, your continual refusal to and DETRACTION from answer them remains the same.
As EVIDENCED and PROVEN, ONCE AGAIN
False, I am answering them. It is your problem if the leading question does not result in the answer you are after. The number of questions leads to an obscurity of the point, this is evidenced and proven once again.
LOL A 'response' is NOT necessarily the answer to the ACTUAL question posed.
As I just wrote in another thread to you. It does NOT matter if I write one or a hundred questions to you in a post, your continual refusal to and DETRACTION from answer them remains the same.
As EVIDENCED and PROVEN, ONCE AGAIN
False, I am answering them. It is your problem if the leading question does not result in the answer you are after. The number of questions leads to an obscurity of the point, this is evidenced and proven once again.
LOL A 'response' is NOT necessarily the answer to the ACTUAL question posed.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 3:18 am
What is being?
That depends on the context of which 'being' is being used.
'Being' can either be; existence, or the nature or essence of a person, or present participle of be. Or, absolutely ANY thing else of your or ANY one else's choosing.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 3:18 am
What is being?
That depends on the context of which 'being' is being used.
'Being' can either be; existence, or the nature or essence of a person, or present participle of be. Or, absolutely ANY thing else of your or ANY one else's choosing.
So being is dependent upon context, and context is being, thus being is defined through fractals of itself?
False, I am answering them. It is your problem if the leading question does not result in the answer you are after. The number of questions leads to an obscurity of the point, this is evidenced and proven once again.
LOL A 'response' is NOT necessarily the answer to the ACTUAL question posed.
Lol, no it is just an answer you did not intend.
But I NEVER 'intended' absolutely ANY thing.
I just ask Truly OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTION, and then await to SEE what happens.
If the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTION/S get answered Honestly or NOT, then this is of NO real concern to me.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 3:18 am
What is being?
That depends on the context of which 'being' is being used.
'Being' can either be; existence, or the nature or essence of a person, or present participle of be. Or, absolutely ANY thing else of your or ANY one else's choosing.
So being is dependent upon context, and context is being, thus being is defined through fractals of itself?
Is being repetition?
OF COURSE, ABSOLUTELY EVERY thing is REPETITIVE and an ASSUMPTION.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 30, 2020 3:18 am
What is being?
That depends on the context of which 'being' is being used.
'Being' can either be; existence, or the nature or essence of a person, or present participle of be. Or, absolutely ANY thing else of your or ANY one else's choosing.
So being is dependent upon context,
The DEFINITION of EVERY word is DEPENDED UPON the CONTEXT in the way that that word is BEING used.
That depends on the context of which 'being' is being used.
'Being' can either be; existence, or the nature or essence of a person, or present participle of be. Or, absolutely ANY thing else of your or ANY one else's choosing.
So being is dependent upon context,
The DEFINITION of EVERY word is DEPENDED UPON the CONTEXT in the way that that word is BEING used.
So in light of your following answers, where do we disagree exactly?