The evil of superiority.

[TheVisionofEr]

The superior despise the lower forms of their genus. Those with weakness in the area of their exclusionary primacy. Thus, to be superior, not to say supreme, is to attack the common by a spontaneous characteristic or drive.

[nothing]

It takes a "believer" to ever "believe" themselves superior to another
and/or others are inferior to themselves. The "superiority" factor is "belief".

"BELIEVER vs. UNBELIEVER"

Where are all the Nazis?
On the side of the "believers".

Who identifies themselves as "believers"?
There you will find your superiority/supremacism/Nazism.
Their game? To scapegoat it onto any/all others. That's their religion.
Accuse others of what they are themselves guilty of,
such to wash the blood from their own hands, even at the expense of others.

Christ = sacrifice of self for the sake of others
anti-Christ = sacrifice of others for the sake of self

[TheVisionofEr]

It takes a "believer" to ever "believe" themselves superior to another
and/or others are inferior to themselves. The "superiority" factor is "belief".

"BELIEVER vs. UNBELIEVER"

Where are all the Nazis?
On the side of the "believers".

Who identifies themselves as "believers"?
There you will find your superiority/supremacism/Nazism.
Their game? To scapegoat it onto any/all others. That's their religion.
Accuse others of what they are themselves guilty of,
such to wash the blood from their own hands, even at the expense of others.

Christ = sacrifice of self for the sake of others
anti-Christ = sacrifice of others for the sake of self

Well, does, eg, Magnus Carlsen meerly believe himself superior, or does he win more at chess than the rest of humanity? And decisively overmatch almost everyone.

You, or if you wish, the content of your very pathetic comments, stray outrageously from reality into the kukoovolksheim (the land of the cloud kooko birds.)

[nothing]

Well, does, eg, Magnus Carlsen meerly believe himself superior, or does he win more at chess than the rest of humanity? And decisively overmatch almost everyone.

Magnus Carlsen employs a conscious discipline, as motivated by his passion for the game of chess.
He need not "believe" he is better than most, he may know this outright, thus not requiring "belief".

You, or if you wish, the content of your very pathetic comments, stray outrageously from reality into the kukoovolksheim (the land of the cloud kooko birds.)

The accuser is the accused.

You draw from your own nature - try your own comments as pathetic and as removed from reality
thus should anyone have an idea as to what 'kukoovolksheim' is... it should be you, as the in-dweller of it.

That you encounter this nature upon others' words stirring it, such to attribute it to others, as if owing to others,
is precisely the constituency of the "pathetic" pathology to which you are yourself succumb.

What else you got buried down there?

[Impenitent]

"no victor believes in chance" - Nietzsche

-Imp

[Lacewing]

Thus, to be superior, not to say supreme, is to attack the common by a spontaneous characteristic or drive.

Stupidity also despises and attacks... perhaps even more so.

[TheVisionofEr]

Well, does, eg, Magnus Carlsen meerly believe himself superior, or does he win more at chess than the rest of humanity? And decisively overmatch almost everyone.

Magnus Carlsen employs a conscious discipline, as motivated by his passion for the game of chess.
He need not "believe" he is better than most, he may know this outright, thus not requiring "belief".

You, or if you wish, the content of your very pathetic comments, stray outrageously from reality into the kukoovolksheim (the land of the cloud kooko birds.)

The accuser is the accused.

You draw from your own nature - try your own comments as pathetic and as removed from reality
thus should anyone have an idea as to what 'kukoovolksheim' is... it should be you, as the in-dweller of it.

That you encounter this nature upon others' words stirring it, such to attribute it to others, as if owing to others,
is precisely the constituency of the "pathetic" pathology to which you are yourself succumb.

What else you got buried down there?

As someone who can think I must confess to somewhat despising you. As is the usual case in all superiority here on the earth.

Interestingly, the Nazis didn't make any official claim to superiority, not to say supramacy. Did you ever study their legal code? Alles was dem Volke nützt, ist Recht, alles was ihm schadet ist Unrecht. This says that what is of use to the German people is good. And what slows their roll, bad.

By the way, the ability to think and make correct judgments is not a matter of vague guessing. Or "belief," so-called.

[TheVisionofEr]

Thus, to be superior, not to say supreme, is to attack the common by a spontaneous characteristic or drive.

Stupidity also despises and attacks... perhaps even more so.

Well, properly, I would say that despising excludes attacking. Attacking implies some regard.

[Lacewing]

Thus, to be superior, not to say supreme, is to attack the common by a spontaneous characteristic or drive.

Stupidity also despises and attacks... perhaps even more so.

Well, properly, I would say that despising excludes attacking. Attacking implies some regard.

Do you just make shit up as you go? Are you aware you're doing that?

[Atla]

Stupidity also despises and attacks... perhaps even more so.

Well, properly, I would say that despising excludes attacking. Attacking implies some regard.

Do you just make shit up as you go? Are you aware you're doing that?

Guy seems to have dedicated his life to formally studying philosophy, but in the end 95%+ of that knowledge is pretty worthless. Not even his fancy way of speaking, or all the drama he came up with, can change that. Must be pretty maddening, huh

[nothing]

As someone who can think I must confess to somewhat despising you. As is the usual case in all superiority here on the earth.

Liar. Not 'somewhat' - you can't stand me.
People who worship lies hate the truth
thus people who both hold and speak truth
above all else.

Interestingly, the Nazis didn't make any official claim to superiority, not to say supramacy. Did you ever study their legal code? Alles was dem Volke nützt, ist Recht, alles was ihm schadet ist Unrecht. This says that what is of use to the German people is good. And what slows their roll, bad.

i. Nazism begins with Muhammad killing "unbelievers" for not "believing" he was receiving messages from an angel
ii. Muhammadans, like the Jews before them, believe a single book is the most "supreme" document on the face of the planet,
not to mention that the idol of Islam Muhammad (who was involved in pedophilia, polygamy, warlordry and genocide) is taken to be
the greatest role model for all of humanity, for all of time.
iii. Identity politics begins with "believer vs. unbeliever" viz. "us vs. them" and perpetual conflict, blaming and scapegoating.
iv. ~1.6B Muhammadans are being lied to by their own leaders re: where the original qibla was and/or where Islam actually began.
v. The expression you quoted is 100% Nazi supremacism "us good them bad" the same "believer vs. unbeliever" root.

I know not to "believe" that you can think....

By the way, the ability to think and make correct judgments is not a matter of vague guessing. Or "belief," so-called.

Correct judgements begins with correct view. If you can't see things for what they are ie. deny facts about reality,
your "thinking" will have nothing to do with the reality as such.

The ability to think is not a mental process, it is a conscious one: to inquire.
Who? What? Where? Why? When? How? If?

Science implies a faculty of inquiry.
Conscience implies the same: only as (or applied to) the self 'con'.
Choice includes what questions to ask, what beliefs to try/test/falsify etc.
Consciousness is the ongoing state of this.

"Belief" is not a conscious process. "I believe... " is the same as saying "I don't know..." because that is what "belief" means: unknown to any degree of certainly, however taken as and/or acted upon as 'true'. What happens if a person "believes" something that is not true, such as... they are in possession of the most supreme document on the face of the planet esp. that instructs them to kill unbelievers until there are none left?

The only thing they have is to point their fingers elsewhere and blame others. Adam did the same to Eve: he could not account for his own actions, hence the scapegoating religions of the world, including Islam which does this religiously, are nothing but the fall from humanity into barbarism, so it is reflected in their religion of cutting heads off. All because they can't stand people who actually use them, as they never learned to use their own, given they call themselves "believers" which, for reasons above, is not a conscious process.

[Eodnhoj7]

As someone who can think I must confess to somewhat despising you. As is the usual case in all superiority here on the earth.

Liar. Not 'somewhat' - you can't stand me.
People who worship lies hate the truth
thus people who both hold and speak truth
above all else.

Interestingly, the Nazis didn't make any official claim to superiority, not to say supramacy. Did you ever study their legal code? Alles was dem Volke nützt, ist Recht, alles was ihm schadet ist Unrecht. This says that what is of use to the German people is good. And what slows their roll, bad.

i. Nazism begins with Muhammad killing "unbelievers" for not "believing" he was receiving messages from an angel
ii. Muhammadans, like the Jews before them, believe a single book is the most "supreme" document on the face of the planet,
not to mention that the idol of Islam Muhammad (who was involved in pedophilia, polygamy, warlordry and genocide) is taken to be
the greatest role model for all of humanity, for all of time.
iii. Identity politics begins with "believer vs. unbeliever" viz. "us vs. them" and perpetual conflict, blaming and scapegoating.
iv. ~1.6B Muhammadans are being lied to by their own leaders re: where the original qibla was and/or where Islam actually began.
v. The expression you quoted is 100% Nazi supremacism "us good them bad" the same "believer vs. unbeliever" root.

I know not to "believe" that you can think....

By the way, the ability to think and make correct judgments is not a matter of vague guessing. Or "belief," so-called.

Correct judgements begins with correct view. If you can't see things for what they are ie. deny facts about reality,
your "thinking" will have nothing to do with the reality as such.

The ability to think is not a mental process, it is a conscious one: to inquire.
Who? What? Where? Why? When? How? If?

Science implies a faculty of inquiry.
Conscience implies the same: only as (or applied to) the self 'con'.
Choice includes what questions to ask, what beliefs to try/test/falsify etc.
Consciousness is the ongoing state of this.

"Belief" is not a conscious process. "I believe... " is the same as saying "I don't know..." because that is what "belief" means: unknown to any degree of certainly, however taken as and/or acted upon as 'true'. What happens if a person "believes" something that is not true, such as... they are in possession of the most supreme document on the face of the planet esp. that instructs them to kill unbelievers until there are none left?

The only thing they have is to point their fingers elsewhere and blame others. Adam did the same to Eve: he could not account for his own actions, hence the scapegoating religions of the world, including Islam which does this religiously, are nothing but the fall from humanity into barbarism, so it is reflected in their religion of cutting heads off. All because they can't stand people who actually use them, as they never learned to use their own, given they call themselves "believers" which, for reasons above, is not a conscious process.

All knowledge through a process of imprinting, hence assumption, regresses to belief.

1. Knowledge is fact.
2. Fact is individuation.
3. Individuation is particulation.
4. Particulation is analysis.
5. Analysis is pattern production.
6. Pattern production is awareness.
7. Awareness is assumption.
8. Assumption is imprinting.
9. Imprinting is acceptance.
10. Acceptance is belief.
11. Knowledge is belief.

[nothing]

All knowledge through a process of imprinting, hence assumption, regresses to belief.

That's not knowledge.
0. Loopis is debilitating.

1. Knowledge is fact.
2. Fact is individuation.
3. Individuation is particulation.
4. Particulation is analysis.
5. Analysis is pattern production.
6. Pattern production is awareness.
7. Awareness is assumption.
8. Assumption is imprinting.
9. Imprinting is acceptance.
10. Acceptance is belief.
11. Knowledge is belief.

1. Knowledge is acknowledgement of fact.
All knowledge negates all belief-based ignorance(s) ad infinitum.

All knowing is by way of consciously trying all belief, but
not all belief is by way of consciously trying to know all.

All knowledge implies no presence of any/all belief-based ignorance(s).
All belief implies implies no presence of any/all knowledge.

[Eodnhoj7]

All knowledge through a process of imprinting, hence assumption, regresses to belief.

That's not knowledge.
0. Loopis is debilitating.

1. Knowledge is fact.
2. Fact is individuation.
3. Individuation is particulation.
4. Particulation is analysis.
5. Analysis is pattern production.
6. Pattern production is awareness.
7. Awareness is assumption.
8. Assumption is imprinting.
9. Imprinting is acceptance.
10. Acceptance is belief.
11. Knowledge is belief.

1. Knowledge is acknowledgement of fact.
All knowledge negates all belief-based ignorance(s) ad infinitum.


That is a part of the truth:

2. Fact is individuation.
3. Individuation is particulation.
4. Particulation is analysis.
5. Analysis is pattern production.
6. Pattern production is awareness.
7. Awareness is assumption.
8. Assumption is imprinting.
9. Imprinting is acceptance.
10. Acceptance is belief.
11. Knowledge is belief.




All knowing is by way of consciously trying all belief, but
not all belief is by way of consciously trying to know all.

All knowledge implies no presence of any/all belief-based ignorance(s).
All belief implies implies no presence of any/all knowledge.

The nature of knowledge, as imprinting, is a nature of assumption. Assumption is acceptance and acceptance is belief. The nature of belief, through knowledge, is an acceptance of patterns. Knowledge, as the replication of patterns through analysis, is justified belief with this justification being the replication of the very same patterns which form it.

It is not possible to have an all knowing state, it is only possible to believe all things as having different grades of truth hence existing as truths. This belief is the acceptance of a phenomenon for what it is as existing.

[TheVisionofEr]

Stupidity also despises and attacks... perhaps even more so.

Well, properly, I would say that despising excludes attacking. Attacking implies some regard.

Do you just make shit up as you go? Are you aware you're doing that?

Well, on whatever planet you are on, I hope you are happy.