Me? No! I lack the finesse (and certainly the patience) required to sell/popularise these ideas. Can't you tell?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:03 pm Yup. You are the man for the job. You totally grok the problem there, you have the tools!
But I know how to capitalise on my knowledge, so I'll just continue doing that while you catch up.
But don't take it from me....
https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=4512
Here's more: https://mycqstate.wordpress.com/2020/01 ... s-project/Yet another reason to be excited about this result—one that somehow hadn’t occurred to me—is that, as far as I know, it’s the first-ever fully convincing example of a non-relativizing computability result.
That's a fancy game-theoretic speak for "cooperative thinking leads to better conclusions". The great "Fuck you!" in the eyeball of antagonistic philosophyIn a previous post I reported on the beautiful recent result by Natarajan and Wright showing the astounding power of multi-prover interactive proofs with quantum provers sharing entanglement.