Cultural Genocide

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Not sure what the hell you are bleating on about but you do seem to be the same person as veritas aquitas. Are you another of those yanks whining about muslims when there are practically no muslims in the US anyway (with many yanks still busy having fun in MUSLIM countries)?

The first victim of Islam is the believing Muslim - nobody is whining about "Muslims": if anything, Muslims incessantly whine and squeal over just about anything and everything: including the ridicule of their idol Muhammad or the egregiously man-made Qur'an. This pig nature is invariably scapegoated onto "Jews" but as the Mark of Cain indicates: the accuser is the accused. Like idol, like idol worshiper: pig.

The U.S. is full of sleeper-cell Muslims waiting for the command to attack. It is their "religion": to kill people who do not "believe" a clearly man-made book and dead polygamous pedophile infidel warlord is the greatest model for all of humanity. In other words: they kill people for not worshiping their idols. The Jews before them did the same: thus, all Muslims are practically Jews, except the Jew is the scapegoat of the Muslim.

It is all of the same Jewish idol worship that justifies the depravity of them - that is the functional purpose of idols such as Muhammad.

You yanks are so lacking in self-awareness and empathy it beggars belief. Paranoid nit-wits.
'Sleeper-cell muslims waiting to attack.' Really? What a shame they have been 'sleeping' for so long then. The same can't be said for your own kristian military, blowing muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' them with opportunistic organisations like ISIS, treating them as sub-human, terrorising them, destroying their lives, homes, history, ancient HUMAN history... The US has a lot to fucking answer for i.e. destroying the world in every possible way.
If the same were happening to the US you would be calling your own 'cells' 'heroes and freedom fighters'.

[nothing]

Just how quickly things can change.

These are your claimed first words in this forum:

Hello...

Forgetting your unorthodox style, or lack of, as you claim, let us look at the words;

First and forever foremost...

And let us look at how much you were 'trying' so hard to come across as wanting, doing, and being for World Peace, however, thee actual Truth just could not be detained anymore, and thus look at how much 'you' have degenerate from those first words; "let there be peace".

Your True intentions in this forum are clear and obvious now. Another one just full of hatred for "others". Yet the funniest part of this is if you were born into and up in a country with that religion only, then you would be one of the biggest haters of "others" and 'you' would actually be the one who really wants to "kill" "others", and most likely would be the one who fulfills this.

Peace need not entail being "nice" to random people online, especially fascist pigs. For example, I am not "nice" to fascist pigs who religiously slander/attack/focus on other individuals instead of content: you! you! you! you! you! you! (emboldened in your own response for emphasis). If I were full of hatred, I'd be strapping a bomb to my person and shouting "Allahu Akbar" instead of working on a practical theorem that helps get "believers" out of their own belief-induced suffering. However, I admire the attempt to scapegoat the hatred of others onto me. When CKIIT goes "live" I should expect a doubling-of-efforts.

P.S. "Allahu Akbar" is invariably a self-incrimination ignorant and/or disobedient to Genesis 2:17 re: eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. God is "greater" according to...?

The believers, by definition, know not from which tree they eat.

Accordingly, I accept that fascist pigs such as yourself exist and understand their nature to attempt to drag all interactions down to a mundane personal "you! you! you!" level. I will thus unreservedly call fascist pigs as I see them (just as Adam called the animals by name): the only thing they can do is i. whine and squeal and ii. continue to prove me right by their continued need to "you! you! you!" - as if they can not help themselves. There is not a single interaction we've had that did not result/degrade into in 'you' dragging it down to a you! you! you! level. It is all 'you' seem capable of doing: you! you! you! It's very Youish - ad homimen, idol worship: it is all the same, hatred being the valid binding inverse of love. Thus, my love for the "believing" women is seen as hatred by the "believing" men.

I have never seen anyone suffer like the believing woman.
-A'isha

1400 years later and she had it more right than Muhammad did. And she didn't even claim to be receiving revelations, she just intuited this by induction: the believing woman is an abused woman.

No change: the first victim of Islam is the "believing" Muslim as the House of Islam religiously employs the "us vs. them" / "believer vs. unbeliever" division responsible for the majority of the hatred on this planet. Fascist pigs attempt to find ways to pin this hatred/divisiveness onto whoever they themselves hate. This intrinsic nature of Islam: to project/scapegoat, will be addressed by the West's leading psychologists who will be able to diagnose the late idol of Islam Muhammad as having suffered a severe mental illness.

The House of Islam attempted to project the same mental illness onto Trump when he was elected. It failed.
That accusation will be returned where it belongs: the idol of Islam Muhammad. He truly had a mental illness.

You yanks are so lacking in self-awareness and empathy it beggars belief. Paranoid nit-wits.
'Sleeper-cell muslims waiting to attack.' Really? What a shame they have been 'sleeping' for so long then. The same can't be said for your own kristian military, blowing muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' them with opportunistic organisations like ISIS, treating them as sub-human, terrorising them, destroying their lives, homes, history, ancient HUMAN history... The US has a lot to fucking answer for i.e. destroying the world in every possible way.
If the same were happening to the US you would be calling your own 'cells' 'heroes and freed fighters'.

I'm not a yank - I don't even know what that is, but it sounds like some sort of derogatory label.

As to the rest: all of the crimes you are attempting to pin on 'kristian' are the crimes of the Muhammadans: 1400 years Islamic invasions, blowing non-Muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' non-Muslim women to sexually degenerated Muhammad Mullahs, treating "unbelievers" as sub-human, terrorizing non-Muslim nations with massacres, destroying the lives of otherwise peaceful human beings who do not bear false witness of a dead pedophile pig.

The House of Islam is attempting to project/scapegoat all of its own crimes against humanity onto the U.S. because that is what the religion of Islam is and does: religiously scapegoats their own crimes against humanity onto whoever their political adversary is. It is the same Canaanite (ie. Jewish) pathology of blood sacrifice: to scapegoat the sins of the tribe onto a sacrificial being.

It doesn't matter either way: when FISA drops the entire Islamic plot to attack the U.S. and the world will be exposed piece-by-piece. Humanity will be given the truth about Islam: the Qur'an is a bloody mess, Mecca did not exist in the time of Muhammad and all mosques built up until 730CE face Petra in South Jordan thus the Muslims are literally facing the wrong direction when praying etc.

Clearly you hate the U.S. - are you a Sausagehood shill ?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Just how quickly things can change.

These are your claimed first words in this forum:

Hello...

Forgetting your unorthodox style, or lack of, as you claim, let us look at the words;

First and forever foremost...

And let us look at how much you were 'trying' so hard to come across as wanting, doing, and being for World Peace, however, thee actual Truth just could not be detained anymore, and thus look at how much 'you' have degenerate from those first words; "let there be peace".

Your True intentions in this forum are clear and obvious now. Another one just full of hatred for "others". Yet the funniest part of this is if you were born into and up in a country with that religion only, then you would be one of the biggest haters of "others" and 'you' would actually be the one who really wants to "kill" "others", and most likely would be the one who fulfills this.

Peace need not entail being "nice" to random people online, especially fascist pigs. For example, I am not "nice" to fascist pigs who religiously slander/attack/focus on other individuals instead of content: you! you! you! you! you! you! (emboldened in your own response for emphasis). If I were full of hatred, I'd be strapping a bomb to my person and shouting "Allahu Akbar" instead of working on a practical theorem that gets "believers" out of their belief-induced suffering. However, I admire the attempt to scapegoat the hatred of others onto me.

I accept that fascist pigs such as yourself exist and understand their nature to attempt to drag all interactions down to a mundane personal "you! you! you!" level. I will thus call fascist pigs as I see them: the only thing they can do is i. whine and squeal and ii. continue to prove me right by their continued need to "you! you! you!". There is not a single interaction we've had that did not result in 'you' dragging it down to a you! you! you! level. It is all 'you' seem capable of doing: you! you! you!

No change: the first victim of Islam is the "believing" Muslim as the House of Islam religiously employs the "us vs. them" / "believer vs. unbeliever" division responsible for the majority of the hatred on this planet. Fascist pigs attempt to find ways to pin this hatred/divisiveness onto whoever they themselves hate.

You yanks are so lacking in self-awareness and empathy it beggars belief. Paranoid nit-wits.
'Sleeper-cell muslims waiting to attack.' Really? What a shame they have been 'sleeping' for so long then. The same can't be said for your own kristian military, blowing muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' them with opportunistic organisations like ISIS, treating them as sub-human, terrorising them, destroying their lives, homes, history, ancient HUMAN history... The US has a lot to fucking answer for i.e. destroying the world in every possible way.
If the same were happening to the US you would be calling your own 'cells' 'heroes and freed fighters'.

I'm not a yank - I don't even know what that is, but it sounds like some sort of derogatory label.

As to the rest: all of the crimes you are attempting to pin on 'kristian' are the crimes of the Muhammadans: 1400 years Islamic invasions, blowing non-Muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' non-Muslim women to sexually degenerated Muhammad Mullahs, treating "unbelievers" as sub-human, terrorizing non-Muslim nations with massacres, destroying the lives of otherwise peaceful human beings who do not bear false witness of a dead pedophile pig.

The House of Islam is attempting to project/scapegoat all of its own crimes against humanity onto the U.S. because that is what the religion of Islam is and does: religiously scapegoats their own crimes against humanity onto whoever their political adversary is. It is the same Canaanite (ie. Jewish) pathology of blood sacrifice: to scapegoat the sins of the tribe onto a sacrificial being.

It doesn't matter either way: when FISA drops the entire Islamic plot to attack the U.S. and the world will be exposed piece-by-piece. Humanity will be given the truth about Islam: the Qur'an is a bloody mess, Mecca did not exist in the time of Muhammad and all mosques built up until 730CE face Petra in South Jordan thus the Muslims are literally facing the wrong direction when praying etc.

Clearly you hate the U.S. - are you a Sausagehood shill ?

You might as well be a yank then. I'm only stating facts. If that comes across as 'hate' then the US needs to stop doing hateful things--like destroying the planet I live on. Are you veritas aquitas? I have no clue what the fuck your question means.

[nothing]

Just how quickly things can change.

These are your claimed first words in this forum:

Hello...

Forgetting your unorthodox style, or lack of, as you claim, let us look at the words;

First and forever foremost...

And let us look at how much you were 'trying' so hard to come across as wanting, doing, and being for World Peace, however, thee actual Truth just could not be detained anymore, and thus look at how much 'you' have degenerate from those first words; "let there be peace".

Your True intentions in this forum are clear and obvious now. Another one just full of hatred for "others". Yet the funniest part of this is if you were born into and up in a country with that religion only, then you would be one of the biggest haters of "others" and 'you' would actually be the one who really wants to "kill" "others", and most likely would be the one who fulfills this.

Peace need not entail being "nice" to random people online, especially fascist pigs. For example, I am not "nice" to fascist pigs who religiously slander/attack/focus on other individuals instead of content: you! you! you! you! you! you! (emboldened in your own response for emphasis). If I were full of hatred, I'd be strapping a bomb to my person and shouting "Allahu Akbar" instead of working on a practical theorem that gets "believers" out of their belief-induced suffering. However, I admire the attempt to scapegoat the hatred of others onto me.

I accept that fascist pigs such as yourself exist and understand their nature to attempt to drag all interactions down to a mundane personal "you! you! you!" level. I will thus call fascist pigs as I see them: the only thing they can do is i. whine and squeal and ii. continue to prove me right by their continued need to "you! you! you!". There is not a single interaction we've had that did not result in 'you' dragging it down to a you! you! you! level. It is all 'you' seem capable of doing: you! you! you!

No change: the first victim of Islam is the "believing" Muslim as the House of Islam religiously employs the "us vs. them" / "believer vs. unbeliever" division responsible for the majority of the hatred on this planet. Fascist pigs attempt to find ways to pin this hatred/divisiveness onto whoever they themselves hate.

You yanks are so lacking in self-awareness and empathy it beggars belief. Paranoid nit-wits.
'Sleeper-cell muslims waiting to attack.' Really? What a shame they have been 'sleeping' for so long then. The same can't be said for your own kristian military, blowing muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' them with opportunistic organisations like ISIS, treating them as sub-human, terrorising them, destroying their lives, homes, history, ancient HUMAN history... The US has a lot to fucking answer for i.e. destroying the world in every possible way.
If the same were happening to the US you would be calling your own 'cells' 'heroes and freed fighters'.

I'm not a yank - I don't even know what that is, but it sounds like some sort of derogatory label.

As to the rest: all of the crimes you are attempting to pin on 'kristian' are the crimes of the Muhammadans: 1400 years Islamic invasions, blowing non-Muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' non-Muslim women to sexually degenerated Muhammad Mullahs, treating "unbelievers" as sub-human, terrorizing non-Muslim nations with massacres, destroying the lives of otherwise peaceful human beings who do not bear false witness of a dead pedophile pig.

The House of Islam is attempting to project/scapegoat all of its own crimes against humanity onto the U.S. because that is what the religion of Islam is and does: religiously scapegoats their own crimes against humanity onto whoever their political adversary is. It is the same Canaanite (ie. Jewish) pathology of blood sacrifice: to scapegoat the sins of the tribe onto a sacrificial being.

It doesn't matter either way: when FISA drops the entire Islamic plot to attack the U.S. and the world will be exposed piece-by-piece. Humanity will be given the truth about Islam: the Qur'an is a bloody mess, Mecca did not exist in the time of Muhammad and all mosques built up until 730CE face Petra in South Jordan thus the Muslims are literally facing the wrong direction when praying etc.

Clearly you hate the U.S. - are you a Sausagehood shill ?

You might as well be a yank then. I'm only stating facts. If that comes across as 'hate' then the US needs to stop doing hateful things--like destroying the planet I live on. Are you veritas aquitas? I have no clue what the fuck your question means.

I still don't know what a yank is.

You're stating facts, but mixing-up the sides viz. projecting the crimes of one onto the other.
The House of Islam needs to stop doing hateful things, like committing genocide against 270 000 000+ "unbelievers" for not "believing" something that is not true. If I had a book which I made-up, and told you I'd enslave/kill you if you didn't believe me that it came to me from a god and I am the final messenger of that god, would you consider that remotely unfair? That is Islam - persecuting/killing people for not believing a man-made book came from a sky-god delivered by a polygamous pedophile infidel slut-of-a-man who religiously abused women for a living.

How do you know the Muhammadans worship the idol of Muhammad?
They spill blood over ridicule of him: a mere graven image in their own psychology leads
them to "believe" it is possible to insult a dead man, mistaking their own insult as Muhammad's.
That is the price of idol worship: to devolve back into animal nature such to spill blood over books/idols.

I am not veritas, I am nothing. If veritas expresses similar concerns about Islam, I know they are sound and grounded in reality: Islam is a cult of hate and death such that it would both take a believer to believe otherwise and/or attempt to point fingers elsewhere, such as the U.S. which is not nearly as heinous as Islam has been, is, and could ever be. The U.S. will be revealing the truth about Islam in 2020 such that all who "hate" the U.S. will learn how retarded they have been for not knowing what was going on: the underground human trafficking networks operated by the House of Islam and Obama being in the Sausagehood (Muslim Brotherhood fyi) with the Clintons having raided/looted other nations (such as Haiti) for their women/children according to: Islamic theological injunctions.

Trump has it all (and then some) - the House of Islam is not long for this world.

Edit: for those who "believe": the ten commandments are materially bound - they are imprinted into the 'fabric' of this dimension of existence, not to be transcended less an knowing/application of them.

Thus:
10 Commandments / 10 Plagues of Egypt
(time is valid in both directions)

The shahada is a necessarily false testimony contrary to the ten commandments. There is a plague associated with false testimonies of dead men: the "believers" know not what lies ahead, for being "believers" not grounded in "knowledge".

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Peace need not entail being "nice" to random people online, especially fascist pigs. For example, I am not "nice" to fascist pigs who religiously slander/attack/focus on other individuals instead of content: you! you! you! you! you! you! (emboldened in your own response for emphasis). If I were full of hatred, I'd be strapping a bomb to my person and shouting "Allahu Akbar" instead of working on a practical theorem that gets "believers" out of their belief-induced suffering. However, I admire the attempt to scapegoat the hatred of others onto me.

I accept that fascist pigs such as yourself exist and understand their nature to attempt to drag all interactions down to a mundane personal "you! you! you!" level. I will thus call fascist pigs as I see them: the only thing they can do is i. whine and squeal and ii. continue to prove me right by their continued need to "you! you! you!". There is not a single interaction we've had that did not result in 'you' dragging it down to a you! you! you! level. It is all 'you' seem capable of doing: you! you! you!

No change: the first victim of Islam is the "believing" Muslim as the House of Islam religiously employs the "us vs. them" / "believer vs. unbeliever" division responsible for the majority of the hatred on this planet. Fascist pigs attempt to find ways to pin this hatred/divisiveness onto whoever they themselves hate.



I'm not a yank - I don't even know what that is, but it sounds like some sort of derogatory label.

As to the rest: all of the crimes you are attempting to pin on 'kristian' are the crimes of the Muhammadans: 1400 years Islamic invasions, blowing non-Muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' non-Muslim women to sexually degenerated Muhammad Mullahs, treating "unbelievers" as sub-human, terrorizing non-Muslim nations with massacres, destroying the lives of otherwise peaceful human beings who do not bear false witness of a dead pedophile pig.

The House of Islam is attempting to project/scapegoat all of its own crimes against humanity onto the U.S. because that is what the religion of Islam is and does: religiously scapegoats their own crimes against humanity onto whoever their political adversary is. It is the same Canaanite (ie. Jewish) pathology of blood sacrifice: to scapegoat the sins of the tribe onto a sacrificial being.

It doesn't matter either way: when FISA drops the entire Islamic plot to attack the U.S. and the world will be exposed piece-by-piece. Humanity will be given the truth about Islam: the Qur'an is a bloody mess, Mecca did not exist in the time of Muhammad and all mosques built up until 730CE face Petra in South Jordan thus the Muslims are literally facing the wrong direction when praying etc.

Clearly you hate the U.S. - are you a Sausagehood shill ?

You might as well be a yank then. I'm only stating facts. If that comes across as 'hate' then the US needs to stop doing hateful things--like destroying the planet I live on. Are you veritas aquitas? I have no clue what the fuck your question means.

I still don't know what a yank is.

You're stating facts, but mixing-up the sides viz. projecting the crimes of one onto the other.
The House of Islam needs to stop doing hateful things, like committing genocide against 270 000 000+ "unbelievers" for not "believing" something that is not true. If I had a book which I made-up, and told you I'd enslave/kill you if you didn't believe me that it came to me from a god and I am the final messenger of that god, would you consider that remotely unfair? That is Islam - persecuting/killing people for not believing a man-made book came from a sky-god delivered by a polygamous pedophile infidel slut-of-a-man who religiously abused women for a living.

I am not veritas, I am nothing. If veritas expresses similar concerns about Islam, I know they are sound and grounded in reality: Islam is a cult of hate and death such that it would both take a believer to believe otherwise and/or attempt to point fingers elsewhere, such as the U.S. which is not nearly as heinous as Islam has been, is, and could ever be. The U.S. will be revealing the truth about Islam in 2020 such that all who "hate" the U.S. will learn how retarded they have been for not knowing what was going on: the underground human trafficking networks operated by the House of Islam and Obama being in the Sausagehood (Muslim Brotherhood fyi) with the Clintons having raided/looted other nations (such as Haiti) for their women/children according to: Islamic theological injunctions.

Trump has it all (and then some) - the House of Islam is not long for this world.

Edit: for those who "believe": the ten commandments are materially bound - they are imprinted into the 'fabric' of this dimension of existence, not to be transcended less an knowing/application of them.

Thus:
10 Commandments / 10 Plagues of Egypt
(time is valid in both directions)

The shahada is a necessarily false testimony contrary to the ten commandments. There is a plague associated with that.

You are clearly insane. And if you are not a yank then why the fuck do you use their horrible misspellings?

[nothing]

You are clearly insane.

Mark of Cain:
the accuser is the accused.

You are projecting your own insanity onto me: please keep it to yourself.

They tried the same with Trump: it didn't work.
It will only backfire: truth stands in the face of all false accusation.

And if you are not a yank then why the fuck do you use their horrible misspellings?

I still don't know what a yank is.

What misspellings?

[henry quirk]

A filthy, illiterate, piggish American.

Like me.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

You are clearly insane.

Mark of Cain:
the accuser is the accused.

You are projecting your own insanity onto me: please keep it to yourself.

They tried the same with Trump: it didn't work.
It will only backfire: truth stands in the face of all false accusation.

And if you are not a yank then why the fuck do you use their horrible misspellings?

I still don't know what a yank is.

What misspellings?

You are clearly insane.

[nothing]

You are clearly insane.

you! you! you!
us vs. them!

Enmity leads to projection, projection leads to drawing from ones own nature: the accuser is the accused.

The substance of your accusation(s) is your own nature,
thus the same will be duly returned to its source of origin: you.

Those who worship lies will hate all truth if/when spoken such to ignorantly mistake the source of that hatred as coming from the speaker, rather than inside of themselves, because that is what the nature of Cain is: to pathologically scapegoat ones own internal 'state' as owing to another.

A accuses B of x with substance y, thus
f(x) = A -> B(y)
wherein (y) is the 'substance' of (the nature of) A, thus:
f(x) = A(y) -> B
A(y) becomes B(y) via false accusation such that "believing" witch mobs who "believe" the false accusation
will attack B for the accusation/nature of A. This is how Canaanite ideologies such as Islam work: project and scapegoat.

People who are collapsed into this Canaanite 'state' of perpetually blaming/projecting/scapegoating are pigs.
People who are collapsed into the believing 'state' of perpetually believing the false accusations are sheep.
People who are open to knowing all not to believe tend towards all-knowing, thus climb mountains like goats.

The tree of the knowledge of good and evil is belief.
The tree of the living is knowing all not to believe.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

[Age]

Just how quickly things can change.

These are your claimed first words in this forum:

Hello...

Forgetting your unorthodox style, or lack of, as you claim, let us look at the words;

First and forever foremost...

And let us look at how much you were 'trying' so hard to come across as wanting, doing, and being for World Peace, however, thee actual Truth just could not be detained anymore, and thus look at how much 'you' have degenerate from those first words; "let there be peace".

Your True intentions in this forum are clear and obvious now. Another one just full of hatred for "others". Yet the funniest part of this is if you were born into and up in a country with that religion only, then you would be one of the biggest haters of "others" and 'you' would actually be the one who really wants to "kill" "others", and most likely would be the one who fulfills this.

Peace need not entail being "nice" to random people online, especially fascist pigs.

Lol what had that got to do with any thing?

'you' completely MISSED the point.

By the way do think focussing on 'me' and calling 'me' a fascist pig or any thing else achieves any thing other than showing 'you' as 'you' really ARE?

For example, I am not "nice" to fascist pigs who religiously slander/attack/focus on other individuals instead of content: you! you! you! you! you! you! (emboldened in your own response for emphasis).

Just because I put single quotation marks around the 'you' word that does NOT at all mean I am even looking at the individual, let alone "religiously slandering, or attacking an individual. In fact if we were to look back over my words in this forum you would have to look, hard long and deep to find any such behaviour from me. But who exactly that incorrect behavior actually comes from can be seen, and very quickly in fact. By the way I have already explained why I use single quotation marks around some words, and it is CERTAINLY NOT for the reason that 'you' believe.

If I were full of hatred, I'd be strapping a bomb to my person and shouting "Allahu Akbar" instead of working on a practical theorem that helps get "believers" out of their own belief-induced suffering.

How many times do you have be told before you come to realize that 'you', "yourself", ARE one of those 'believers'?

Also, as I pointed out and said, and which you just admitted, 'you' are that type of person who if grew up in another culture who be the one HATING the culture you are in now, and would want to be and probably would be "killing" them just because they have different views from 'you'. Your hatred and disgust of islam and muslims is blindingly obvious.

However, I admire the attempt to scapegoat the hatred of others onto me. When CKIIT goes "live" I should expect a doubling-of-efforts.

When does whatever that is, go "live"?

And what does "doubling-of-efforts" even mean, which 'you're expect SHOULD happen?

P.S. "Allahu Akbar" is invariably a self-incrimination ignorant and/or disobedient to Genesis 2:17 re: eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. God is "greater" according to...?

You keep re-repeating this, and I have asked for clarity about what it is that you are 'trying to' say? But 'you' NEVER do clarify.

The believers, by definition, know not from which tree they eat.

AND, do not forget that 'you' ARE just another one of those BELIVERS.

Accordingly, I accept that fascist pigs such as yourself exist and understand their nature to attempt to drag all interactions down to a mundane personal "you! you! you!" level.

Is this a PRIME EXAMPLE of what 'you' accuse me of doing, which is; religiously slander/attack/focus on other individuals instead of content?

I will thus unreservedly call fascist pigs as I see them (just as Adam called the animals by name): the only thing they can do is i. whine and squeal and ii. continue to prove me right by their continued need to "you! you! you!" - as if they can not help themselves. There is not a single interaction we've had that did not result/degrade into in 'you' dragging it down to a you! you! you! level. It is all 'you' seem capable of doing: you! you! you! It's very Youish - ad homimen, idol worship: it is all the same, hatred being the valid binding inverse of love. Thus, my love for the "believing" women is seen as hatred by the "believing" men.

Are you ever able elaborate on what you are saying? You obviously are not able to, or you will not, clarify questions, so are you able to at least explain what you actually mean in what you continually repeat over and over again?

I have about six clarifying questions I could ask 'you' just in relation to your last sentence here, but I will not.

By the way, 'you' can call whoever you want whatever you want. I really do NOT care at all.

I have never seen anyone suffer like the believing woman.
-A'isha

1400 years later and she had it more right than Muhammad did. And she didn't even claim to be receiving revelations, she just intuited this by induction: the believing woman is an abused woman.

What has this got to do with the fact that 'you' are just pretending that 'you' have, and are doing, things to create peace, but really your hated of "others" is 'you' are really showing here?

No change: the first victim of Islam is the "believing" Muslim as the House of Islam religiously employs the "us vs. them" / "believer vs. unbeliever" division responsible for the majority of the hatred on this planet. Fascist pigs attempt to find ways to pin this hatred/divisiveness onto whoever they themselves hate. This intrinsic nature of Islam: to project/scapegoat, will be addressed by the West's leading psychologists who will be able to diagnose the late idol of Islam Muhammad as having suffered a severe mental illness..

'you' really should talk to that one in this forum known as "veritas aequitas" both of 'you' would get on great 'together' increasing the hatred within each "other" of islam and muslims to a breaking point where 'you' would actually do some thing about it, instead of just SHOWING the absolute HATRED that is welled up within 'you'.

The House of Islam attempted to project the same mental illness onto Trump when he was elected.

Really?

It failed.

Okay.

That accusation will be returned where it belongs: the idol of Islam Muhammad. He truly had a mental illness.

Okay. But if 'you' were brought up in and with islam, then you would not be saying this now. 'you' would be one of the biggest worshipers and followers, and from what I have so far observed from 'you' you probably would have already blown "yourself" up and as many of the "others" that you could have taken with you. 'you' appear to be one of the Truest and biggest idolizer of your own BELIEFS.

You yanks are so lacking in self-awareness and empathy it beggars belief. Paranoid nit-wits.
'Sleeper-cell muslims waiting to attack.' Really? What a shame they have been 'sleeping' for so long then. The same can't be said for your own kristian military, blowing muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' them with opportunistic organisations like ISIS, treating them as sub-human, terrorising them, destroying their lives, homes, history, ancient HUMAN history... The US has a lot to fucking answer for i.e. destroying the world in every possible way.
If the same were happening to the US you would be calling your own 'cells' 'heroes and freed fighters'.

I'm not a yank - I don't even know what that is, but it sounds like some sort of derogatory label.

As to the rest: all of the crimes you are attempting to pin on 'kristian' are the crimes of the Muhammadans: 1400 years Islamic invasions, blowing non-Muslim countries to smithereens, 'gifting' non-Muslim women to sexually degenerated Muhammad Mullahs, treating "unbelievers" as sub-human, terrorizing non-Muslim nations with massacres, destroying the lives of otherwise peaceful human beings who do not bear false witness of a dead pedophile pig.

The House of Islam is attempting to project/scapegoat all of its own crimes against humanity onto the U.S. because that is what the religion of Islam is and does: religiously scapegoats their own crimes against humanity onto whoever their political adversary is. It is the same Canaanite (ie. Jewish) pathology of blood sacrifice: to scapegoat the sins of the tribe onto a sacrificial being.

It doesn't matter either way: when FISA drops the entire Islamic plot to attack the U.S. and the world will be exposed piece-by-piece. Humanity will be given the truth about Islam: the Qur'an is a bloody mess, Mecca did not exist in the time of Muhammad and all mosques built up until 730CE face Petra in South Jordan thus the Muslims are literally facing the wrong direction when praying etc.

Clearly you hate the U.S. - are you a Sausagehood shill ?

[nothing]

By the way do think focussing on 'me' and calling 'me' a fascist pig or any thing else achieves any thing other than showing 'you' as 'you' really ARE?

It shows I am both observant and unafraid to call a fascist pig when I see one - you are certainly a fascist pig and a disgusting one at that.

How many times do you have be told before you come to realize that 'you', "yourself", ARE one of those 'believers'?

I don't believe Allah is greater - I know Allah is Muhammad's dick, as this is what Muslims are actually worshiping. They do not understand this, because they do not understand Muhammad's Allah served exactly that: his own dick.

Also, as I pointed out and said, and which you just admitted, 'you' are that type of person who if grew up in another culture who be the one HATING the culture you are in now, and would want to be and probably would be "killing" them just because they have different views from 'you'. Your hatred and disgust of islam and muslims is blindingly obvious.

Islam is naturally disgusting, but I invariably love Muslim women - the theorem is entirely dedicated to them. I understand you would wish to label/slander me as some killing maniac - trying to scapegoat the crimes of the "believers" onto me. That is what is disgusting, and is what makes you a fascist pig.

You keep re-repeating this, and I have asked for clarity about what it is that you are 'trying to' say? But 'you' NEVER do clarify.

You don't understand the admonishment because you are guilty of it, as all "believers" are. The theorem clarifies it, but those who eat from the tree will not see it because they are blinded by the you! you! you! hatred.

AND, do not forget that 'you' ARE just another one of those BELIVERS.

I'm sure it would suit your own internal narrative, but no, I am not a "believer" - you certainly are a believer to believe I am.

Again, please stop projecting your own 'state' onto others - it is what fascist pigs do.

Is this a PRIME EXAMPLE of what 'you' accuse me of doing, which is; religiously slander/attack/focus on other individuals instead of content?

It's not an accusation, it's an observation - it is certainly your nature to label/slander/harass people if/when you can not touch their ideas/content. It is precisely what a fascist pig is: attack the person. It's very lowly.

Are you ever able elaborate on what you are saying? You obviously are not able to, or you will not, clarify questions, so are you able to at least explain what you actually mean in what you continually repeat over and over again?

No amount of elaboration will clarify what one is incapable of hearing.

What has this got to do with the fact that 'you' are just pretending that 'you' have, and are doing, things to create peace, but really your hated of "others" is 'you' are really showing here?

You are clearly trying to push this "hate" agenda against me, but it's not going to work. That I recognize you as a fascist pig may be the "hatred" you are trying to account for - you seem to hate people who are "correct".

'you' really should talk to that one in this forum known as "veritas aequitas" both of 'you' would get on great 'together' increasing the hatred within each "other" of islam and muslims to a breaking point where 'you' would actually do some thing about it, instead of just SHOWING the absolute HATRED that is welled up within 'you'.

Will you stop whining and squealing about hatred? Nobody here hates Muslims - they are the first victims of Islam, and I'd be the first to make sure that point is understood first-and-foremost. The House of Pig exploits such polarization against "Muslims" because the House of Pig exploits their own people for political/ideological gain. It is another reason the first victim of Islam is the "believing" Muslim.

Something is being done about it - you will see it in 2020.

Okay. But if 'you' were brought up in and with islam, then you would not be saying this now. 'you' would be one of the biggest worshipers and followers, and from what I have so far observed from 'you' you probably would have already blown "yourself" up and as many of the "others" that you could have taken with you. 'you' appear to be one of the Truest and biggest idolizer of your own BELIEFS.

LOL Did you just try to accuse me of being a jihadi? Scapegoat the crimes of the House of Pig onto me? Lol.

I would know not to believe Islam is a religion of peace and/or Muhammad is the greatest example for all of humanity. Either notions can be tried/tested/falsified with relative ease less one worship Muhammad's "thing" Allah.

You fascist pigs are truly like animals: slander, harass, label, smear, project, scapegoat etc. Are you a Muhammadan? Do you have the shahada (Mark of the Beast) intact? I can't help but sense the derangement in you - not unlike the Muhammadans who loathe humanity while "believing" themselves superior to it.

Such attempt to project all of the degeneracy of the House Islam onto me is thus extremely pathetic. However, it serves me well as I will be going up against the House of Swine anyways who are invariably full of the same: fascist pigs. It would be good to have some practice such to learn the nature of the fascist pig.

As stated earlier:

I will thus unreservedly call fascist pigs as I see them (just as Adam called the animals by name): the only thing they can do is i. whine and squeal and ii. continue to prove me right by their continued need to "you! you! you!" - as if they can not help themselves.

Will you continue along with i. and ii. ?

[Age]

By the way do think focussing on 'me' and calling 'me' a fascist pig or any thing else achieves any thing other than showing 'you' as 'you' really ARE?

It shows I am both observant and unafraid to call a fascist pig when I see one - you are certainly a fascist pig and a disgusting one at that.

Lol
Lol
LOL

Is this how your ckiit will work to create World Peace?

How long do your propose World Peace will be the norm with that kind of attitude?

How many times do you have be told before you come to realize that 'you', "yourself", ARE one of those 'believers'?

I don't believe Allah is greater - I know Allah is Muhammad's dick, as this is what Muslims are actually worshiping. They do not understand this, because they do not understand Muhammad's Allah served exactly that: his own dick.

Would you like people to take you seriously?

Also, as I pointed out and said, and which you just admitted, 'you' are that type of person who if grew up in another culture who be the one HATING the culture you are in now, and would want to be and probably would be "killing" them just because they have different views from 'you'. Your hatred and disgust of islam and muslims is blindingly obvious.

Islam is naturally disgusting, but I invariably love Muslim women - the theorem is entirely dedicated to them.

Lol

Why do you invariably love muslim women?

I understand you would wish to label/slander me as some killing maniac - trying to scapegoat the crimes of the "believers" onto me. That is what is disgusting, and is what makes you a fascist pig.

But, once again, 'you' are completely WRONG.

You OBVIOUSLY, once again, MISSED the point I was making.

You keep re-repeating this, and I have asked for clarity about what it is that you are 'trying to' say? But 'you' NEVER do clarify.

You don't understand the admonishment because you are guilty of it, as all "believers" are.

What 'adonishment'?

But 'you', "nothing", are the 'believer' here.

Did 'you' forget I do not believe any thing?

The theorem clarifies it, but those who eat from the tree will not see it because they are blinded by the you! you! you! hatred.

WHAT "theorem"?

So, my very words, which you quote me here, which is where I am pointing out that you just re-repeat things without ever clarifying, nor elaborating on, your response to that is, to just re-repeat some thing AGAIN, without talking about or clarifying what it actually is.

I have absolutely NO idea what "the theorem" IS.

AND, do not forget that 'you' ARE just another one of those BELIVERS.

I'm sure it would suit your own internal narrative, but no, I am not a "believer" - you certainly are a believer to believe I am.

But I do NOT believe that.

Are you saying that there is NOTHING that 'you' believe?

If yes, then great.

we have a lit in common. So, is that your answer?

Again, please stop projecting your own 'state' onto others - it is what fascist pigs do.

Lol 'you' could NOT be MORE wrong even if you wanted to be and tried to be.

Is this a PRIME EXAMPLE of what 'you' accuse me of doing, which is; religiously slander/attack/focus on other individuals instead of content?

It's not an accusation, it's an observation - it is certainly your nature to label/slander/harass people if/when you can not touch their ideas/content.

1. I have NO idea what your ideas/content are BECAUSE 'you' will NOT tell us what they are. Therefore I, obviously, can NOT touch what I have NIt been exposed to YET.

2. Can you provide one example of where I have supposedly "labeled/slandered/harrassed" ANY one?

3. Are you absolutely CERTAIN that it is CERTAINLY 'my nature'?

4. Are all of your observations the actual Truth if things and never just accusations?

It is precisely what a fascist pig is: attack the person. It's very lowly.

And LOL what do 'you' think 'you' are doing right here and right now?

And point out where I have supposedly "attacked the person"

Are you ever able elaborate on what you are saying? You obviously are not able to, or you will not, clarify questions, so are you able to at least explain what you actually mean in what you continually repeat over and over again?

No amount of elaboration will clarify what one is incapable of hearing.

Are you proposing that I am incapable of hearing some thing?

If yes, then just say here now so at least "others" can then hear and see what it is that I am supposedly "incapable of hearing".

Until then NO ONE besides 'you' has absolutely any idea about what it that 'you' are going on about. Or, maybe "veritas aequitas" might 'you' "both" appear to have the exact same amount of HATRED for the sane thing/s.

What has this got to do with the fact that 'you' are just pretending that 'you' have, and are doing, things to create peace, but really your hated of "others" is 'you' are really showing here?

You are clearly trying to push this "hate" agenda against me, but it's not going to work. That I recognize you as a fascist pig may be the "hatred" you are trying to account for - you seem to hate people who are "correct".

If this wlis what seems to 'you', then that is perfectly okay. But what exactly made it seem like that, to 'you'?

'you' really should talk to that one in this forum known as "veritas aequitas" both of 'you' would get on great 'together' increasing the hatred within each "other" of islam and muslims to a breaking point where 'you' would actually do some thing about it, instead of just SHOWING the absolute HATRED that is welled up within 'you'.

Will you stop whining and squealing about hatred? Nobody here hates Muslims - they are the first victims of Islam, and I'd be the first to make sure that point is understood first-and-foremost.

Okay, so 'you' want us to KNOW that the ones who worship mohammed's dick are victims. Fair enough. Are the ones who kill non-believers and/ir westerners also victims?

If yes, then would they still remain victims if they killed your immediate family members? Would you still help them and support them the way you are making out you are doing now?

The House of Pig exploits such polarization against "Muslims" because the House of Pig exploits their own people for political/ideological gain. It is another reason the first victim of Islam is the "believing" Muslim.

So, if ALL people are being exploited by some "house of pig" thing, then who or what gains politically/ideologically other than that "house of pig"?

And how could ANY house gain any thing politically or idealigically?

Something is being done about it - you will see it in 2020.

Ah okay, not long to go now then.

Okay. But if 'you' were brought up in and with islam, then you would not be saying this now. 'you' would be one of the biggest worshipers and followers, and from what I have so far observed from 'you' you probably would have already blown "yourself" up and as many of the "others" that you could have taken with you. 'you' appear to be one of the Truest and biggest idolizer of your own BELIEFS.

LOL Did you just try to accuse me of being a jihadi?

No.

To do do would not even make any sense.

Scapegoat the crimes of the House of Pig onto me? Lol.

Are you asking me or telling me? while you are laughing.

I would know not to believe Islam is a religion of peace and/or Muhammad is the greatest example for all of humanity.

Now that is a joke. Lol when would you know this?

Either notions can be tried/tested/falsified with relative ease less one worship Muhammad's "thing" Allah.

Are you at all aware that the word 'Allah' is usually in reference to a God thing, and not to mohammed's dick thing?

You fascist pigs are truly like animals: slander, harass, label, smear, project, scapegoat etc. Are you a Muhammadan? Do you have the shahada (Mark of the Beast) intact? I can't help but sense the derangement in you - not unlike the Muhammadans who loathe humanity while "believing" themselves superior to it.

Could, would, some see this exact same behavior here from 'you', "nothing"?

Such attempt to project all of the degeneracy of the House Islam onto me is thus extremely pathetic. However, it serves me well as I will be going up against the House of Swine anyways who are invariably full of the same: fascist pigs. It would be good to have some practice such to learn the nature of the fascist pig.

Okay, then that is great I was of some assistance to you. Good luck in your endeavor, whatever it actually is. But I will supposedly see it soon enough, correct?

As stated earlier:

I will thus unreservedly call fascist pigs as I see them (just as Adam called the animals by name): the only thing they can do is i. whine and squeal and ii. continue to prove me right by their continued need to "you! you! you!" - as if they can not help themselves.

Will you continue along with i. and ii. ?

You did say it serves you well if I continue, so what do 'you' now suggest I DO?

[nothing]

Lol
Lol
LOL

Is this how your ckiit will work to create World Peace?

How long do your propose World Peace will be the norm with that kind of attitude?

World peace doesn't depend on me - the fallibility of any being will be reached before CKIIT, because CKIIT is infallible (it is designed that way).

Would you like people to take you seriously?

No: they are better off taking truth seriously. Muhammad utilized Allah to satiate his own sexual lust.

Lol

Why do you invariably love muslim women?

A number of reasons - some are personal, some relate to A'isha being more right than Muhammad was. After all, she and Hafsa are alleged to have poisoned Muhammad in order to expedite his demise.

Some authors suggest that Muḥammadʼs death was the result of the combined effect of the poison he was given on the two occasions. Al-Majlisī (d. 1110/1699), for example, states that the poisons given to him in the mutton and by the two women acted conjointly to bring about his martyrdom. 37 Similarly, Niʿmat Allāh al-Jazāʾirī (d. 1112/1700–1701) notes that once Abū Bakr and ʿUmar knew they would succeed the Prophet they ordered ʿĀʾisha and Ḥaf ṣa to give him poison in order to hasten his demise (taʿjīlan ʿalā itlāfihi). The daughters did as they were told,‘
and this was the cause of his death, in addition to the traces in (or: effect on) his noble body of the poison which the Jewish woman of Khaybar
had placed in the roast lambʼ

https://www.academia.edu/5323343/Sh%C4% ... =thumbnail

But, once again, 'you' are completely WRONG.

You OBVIOUSLY, once again, MISSED the point I was making.

My observations are invariably correct. They are confirmed by CKIIT (to which you are being subjected) and your POC (point-of-collapse) is already predicted.

What 'adonishment'?

But 'you', "nothing", are the 'believer' here.

Did 'you' forget I do not believe any thing?

Genesis 2:17
I only believe in possibilities I know are possible - that is the only viability of "belief": still an acknowledgement of what is unknown(s).
You are certainly rooted in 'belief': it is entirely consistent with your own ignorance of the admonishment of Genesis 2:17.

WHAT "theorem"?

So, my very words, which you quote me here, which is where I am pointing out that you just re-repeat things without ever clarifying, nor elaborating on, your response to that is, to just re-repeat some thing AGAIN, without talking about or clarifying what it actually is.

I have absolutely NO idea what "the theorem" IS.

You're not supposed to know - nobody is. The predictive power/potency of the theorem mandates that it be a controlled process. As already indicated: this process begins in 2020 and will have its own global platform that has nothing to do with these forums.

But I do NOT believe that.

Are you saying that there is NOTHING that 'you' believe?

If yes, then great.

we have a lit in common. So, is that your answer?

It is your own "belief" that I am a "believer" hence: the accuser is the accused. It's the same fascist pig Canaanite methodology of scapegoating one's own internal 'state' onto others. You are a "believer" who "believes" that I am a "believer". The "belief" begins (and ends) with you.

Lol 'you' could NOT be MORE wrong even if you wanted to be and tried to be.

The opposite is true: I could not be more right. It is the reason you incessantly attempt to you! you! you! me and others. Of the hundreds of billions of galaxies, ours is but one (a tiny speck) within which our solar system is a tiny-tiny speck, within which our planet is a tiny-tiny-tiny speck, upon which you discard all of this and focus on a single being: you! you! you! This is how shallow and pathetic Canaanites are. Hence: the theorem maps a torus field such that it satisfies any condition in-and-of this cosmos.

1. I have NO idea what your ideas/content are BECAUSE 'you' will NOT tell us what they are. Therefore I, obviously, can NOT touch what I have NIt been exposed to YET.

2. Can you provide one example of where I have supposedly "labeled/slandered/harrassed" ANY one?

3. Are you absolutely CERTAIN that it is CERTAINLY 'my nature'?

4. Are all of your observations the actual Truth if things and never just accusations?

1. There is plenty of content out there - pick any one of my threads and/or graphics.
2. "'you' are that type of person who if grew up in another culture who be the one HATING the culture you are in now, and would want to be and probably would be "killing" them just because they have different views from 'you'. Your hatred and disgust of islam and muslims is blindingly obvious." literally from your last reply.
3. At present: yes, certainly. I can't say what the future holds for you: it depends on what you "choose".
4. Accusations can be true, but are almost invariably not if/when rooted in enmity. Such begins the process of drawing from ones own nature such to project the substance of ones own nature in the form of an accusation. If/when institutionalized, this would be things like "Islamophobia": the House of Islam criminalizing ridicule of Islam because they are themselves "Islamophobic" however blame others for their own internal state of being.

And LOL what do 'you' think 'you' are doing right here and right now?

And point out where I have supposedly "attacked the person"

If you smack someone, and they smack you back, would you whine and squeal about them smacking you?
Very much like the Palestinians: they abuse others, get abused back such that they whine and squeal.

Are you proposing that I am incapable of hearing some thing?

If yes, then just say here now so at least "others" can then hear and see what it is that I am supposedly "incapable of hearing".

Until then NO ONE besides 'you' has absolutely any idea about what it that 'you' are going on about. Or, maybe "veritas aequitas" might 'you' "both" appear to have the exact same amount of HATRED for the sane thing/s.

Playing the hatred card again? Did we not move past that? Why must you beat a dead horse?

If this wlis what seems to 'you', then that is perfectly okay. But what exactly made it seem like that, to 'you'?

You can not engage in a single topic without your exhausting use of 'you! 'you! 'you!' such to make everything personal (then attempt to blame your own derailing on the other).

It is like a gravitational collapse: as a person has less and less ability to focus on substance, they focus on 'you!' 'you!' 'you!'

The map of CKIIT clarifies this:


+A = Cain (collapses) = enmity and desire to spill blood
-A = Abel (expands) = (inverse of ^^^)

Okay, so 'you' want us to KNOW that the ones who worship mohammed's dick are victims. Fair enough. Are the ones who kill non-believers and/ir westerners also victims?

If yes, then would they still remain victims if they killed your immediate family members? Would you still help them and support them the way you are making out you are doing now?

Yes and yes - that Muhammadans take the lives of others is their own victimhood trying to make others into victims. It is like their obsession with cutting people's heads off: they are trying to make others as brainless as they themselves are. It is deep-rooted and they have no conscious awareness of where such impulses come from: it is precisely because they are victims they would commit such atrocities. You know the expression "share the love"? Well, "share the suffering" is the mark of the "believing" Muhammadan. The problem: they suffer their own ideology.

If Satan had a dick, he'd have named it BELIEF
such that the BELIEVERS are suckers of it.

So, if ALL people are being exploited by some "house of pig" thing, then who or what gains politically/ideologically other than that "house of pig"?

And how could ANY house gain any thing politically or idealigically?

None - Muhammad's Islam served himself, just as the House of Pig serves the swine that run it, just as Muhammadan men are the sole beneficiaries of the ideology viz. patriarchal abuse of women/children.

Women are being turned into men because the House of Pig doesn't want people to realize "real" women are disappearing off the face of the planet. They are treated as an expendable in Islam.

Now that is a joke. Lol when would you know this?

After questioning the principle claim(s) upon which the 'state' is constructed: the Qur'an is (laughably) certainly not the perfect, inimitable, unaltered, inerrant word of any god. In reality, it is evolved from Syriac Christian strophic hymns and was scattered in pieces all over Arabia. The opposite is clearly true: the Qur'an is imperfect, imitable, altered, errant etc. I'd know Islam is thus a product of the swinery of man, and would walk away for wishing not to be a pig.

Are you at all aware that the word 'Allah' is usually in reference to a God thing, and not to mohammed's dick thing?

I know exactly what the word is intended to mean: all-not.
I know Muslims "believe" Allah is a god, but it certainly is not.
I know Muhammad used "Allah" to satiate his own sexual lust.

Could, would, some see this exact same behavior here from 'you', "nothing"?

Not everyone is as obsessed with 'you!' 'you!' 'you!' as you are.

Okay, then that is great I was of some assistance to you. Good luck in your endeavor, whatever it actually is. But I will supposedly see it soon enough, correct?

ts.

You did say it serves you well if I continue, so what do 'you' now suggest I DO?

Think long and hard about your obsession with 'you! 'you!' 'you!' and how it might being a blinding agency.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Lol
Lol
LOL

Is this how your ckiit will work to create World Peace?

How long do your propose World Peace will be the norm with that kind of attitude?

World peace doesn't depend on me - the fallibility of any being will be reached before CKIIT, because CKIIT is infallible (it is designed that way).

Would you like people to take you seriously?

No: they are better off taking truth seriously. Muhammad utilized Allah to satiate his own sexual lust.

Lol

Why do you invariably love muslim women?

A number of reasons - some are personal, some relate to A'isha being more right than Muhammad was. After all, she and Hafsa are alleged to have poisoned Muhammad in order to expedite his demise.

Some authors suggest that Muḥammadʼs death was the result of the combined effect of the poison he was given on the two occasions. Al-Majlisī (d. 1110/1699), for example, states that the poisons given to him in the mutton and by the two women acted conjointly to bring about his martyrdom. 37 Similarly, Niʿmat Allāh al-Jazāʾirī (d. 1112/1700–1701) notes that once Abū Bakr and ʿUmar knew they would succeed the Prophet they ordered ʿĀʾisha and Ḥaf ṣa to give him poison in order to hasten his demise (taʿjīlan ʿalā itlāfihi). The daughters did as they were told,‘
and this was the cause of his death, in addition to the traces in (or: effect on) his noble body of the poison which the Jewish woman of Khaybar
had placed in the roast lambʼ

https://www.academia.edu/5323343/Sh%C4% ... =thumbnail

But, once again, 'you' are completely WRONG.

You OBVIOUSLY, once again, MISSED the point I was making.

My observations are invariably correct. They are confirmed by CKIIT (to which you are being subjected) and your POC (point-of-collapse) is already predicted.

What 'adonishment'?

But 'you', "nothing", are the 'believer' here.

Did 'you' forget I do not believe any thing?

Genesis 2:17
I only believe in possibilities I know are possible - that is the only viability of "belief": still an acknowledgement of what is unknown(s).
You are certainly rooted in 'belief': it is entirely consistent with your own ignorance of the admonishment of Genesis 2:17.

WHAT "theorem"?

So, my very words, which you quote me here, which is where I am pointing out that you just re-repeat things without ever clarifying, nor elaborating on, your response to that is, to just re-repeat some thing AGAIN, without talking about or clarifying what it actually is.

I have absolutely NO idea what "the theorem" IS.

You're not supposed to know - nobody is. The predictive power/potency of the theorem mandates that it be a controlled process. As already indicated: this process begins in 2020 and will have its own global platform that has nothing to do with these forums.

But I do NOT believe that.

Are you saying that there is NOTHING that 'you' believe?

If yes, then great.

we have a lit in common. So, is that your answer?

It is your own "belief" that I am a "believer" hence: the accuser is the accused. It's the same fascist pig Canaanite methodology of scapegoating one's own internal 'state' onto others. You are a "believer" who "believes" that I am a "believer". The "belief" begins (and ends) with you.

Lol 'you' could NOT be MORE wrong even if you wanted to be and tried to be.

The opposite is true: I could not be more right. It is the reason you incessantly attempt to you! you! you! me and others. Of the hundreds of billions of galaxies, ours is but one (a tiny speck) within which our solar system is a tiny-tiny speck, within which our planet is a tiny-tiny-tiny speck, upon which you discard all of this and focus on a single being: you! you! you! This is how shallow and pathetic Canaanites are. Hence: the theorem maps a torus field such that it satisfies any condition in-and-of this cosmos.

1. I have NO idea what your ideas/content are BECAUSE 'you' will NOT tell us what they are. Therefore I, obviously, can NOT touch what I have NIt been exposed to YET.

2. Can you provide one example of where I have supposedly "labeled/slandered/harrassed" ANY one?

3. Are you absolutely CERTAIN that it is CERTAINLY 'my nature'?

4. Are all of your observations the actual Truth if things and never just accusations?

1. There is plenty of content out there - pick any one of my threads and/or graphics.
2. "'you' are that type of person who if grew up in another culture who be the one HATING the culture you are in now, and would want to be and probably would be "killing" them just because they have different views from 'you'. Your hatred and disgust of islam and muslims is blindingly obvious." literally from your last reply.
3. At present: yes, certainly. I can't say what the future holds for you: it depends on what you "choose".
4. Accusations can be true, but are almost invariably not if/when rooted in enmity. Such begins the process of drawing from ones own nature such to project the substance of ones own nature in the form of an accusation. If/when institutionalized, this would be things like "Islamophobia": the House of Islam criminalizing ridicule of Islam because they are themselves "Islamophobic" however blame others for their own internal state of being.

And LOL what do 'you' think 'you' are doing right here and right now?

And point out where I have supposedly "attacked the person"

If you smack someone, and they smack you back, would you whine and squeal about them smacking you?
Very much like the Palestinians: they abuse others, get abused back such that they whine and squeal.

Are you proposing that I am incapable of hearing some thing?

If yes, then just say here now so at least "others" can then hear and see what it is that I am supposedly "incapable of hearing".

Until then NO ONE besides 'you' has absolutely any idea about what it that 'you' are going on about. Or, maybe "veritas aequitas" might 'you' "both" appear to have the exact same amount of HATRED for the sane thing/s.

Playing the hatred card again? Did we not move past that? Why must you beat a dead horse?

If this wlis what seems to 'you', then that is perfectly okay. But what exactly made it seem like that, to 'you'?

You can not engage in a single topic without your exhausting use of 'you! 'you! 'you!' such to make everything personal (then attempt to blame your own derailing on the other).

It is like a gravitational collapse: as a person has less and less ability to focus on substance, they focus on 'you!' 'you!' 'you!'

The map of CKIIT clarifies this:


+A = Cain (collapses) = enmity and desire to spill blood
-A = Abel (expands) = (inverse of ^^^)

Okay, so 'you' want us to KNOW that the ones who worship mohammed's dick are victims. Fair enough. Are the ones who kill non-believers and/ir westerners also victims?

If yes, then would they still remain victims if they killed your immediate family members? Would you still help them and support them the way you are making out you are doing now?

Yes and yes - that Muhammadans take the lives of others is their own victimhood trying to make others into victims. It is like their obsession with cutting people's heads off: they are trying to make others as brainless as they themselves are. It is deep-rooted and they have no conscious awareness of where such impulses come from: it is precisely because they are victims they would commit such atrocities. You know the expression "share the love"? Well, "share the suffering" is the mark of the "believing" Muhammadan. The problem: they suffer their own ideology.

If Satan had a dick, he'd have named it BELIEF
such that the BELIEVERS are suckers of it.

So, if ALL people are being exploited by some "house of pig" thing, then who or what gains politically/ideologically other than that "house of pig"?

And how could ANY house gain any thing politically or idealigically?

None - Muhammad's Islam served himself, just as the House of Pig serves the swine that run it, just as Muhammadan men are the sole beneficiaries of the ideology viz. patriarchal abuse of women/children.

Women are being turned into men because the House of Pig doesn't want people to realize "real" women are disappearing off the face of the planet. They are treated as an expendable in Islam.

Now that is a joke. Lol when would you know this?

After questioning the principle claim(s) upon which the 'state' is constructed: the Qur'an is (laughably) certainly not the perfect, inimitable, unaltered, inerrant word of any god. In reality, it is evolved from Syriac Christian strophic hymns and was scattered in pieces all over Arabia. The opposite is clearly true: the Qur'an is imperfect, imitable, altered, errant etc. I'd know Islam is thus a product of the swinery of man, and would walk away for wishing not to be a pig.

Are you at all aware that the word 'Allah' is usually in reference to a God thing, and not to mohammed's dick thing?

I know exactly what the word is intended to mean: all-not.
I know Muslims "believe" Allah is a god, but it certainly is not.
I know Muhammad used "Allah" to satiate his own sexual lust.

Could, would, some see this exact same behavior here from 'you', "nothing"?

Not everyone is as obsessed with 'you!' 'you!' 'you!' as you are.

Okay, then that is great I was of some assistance to you. Good luck in your endeavor, whatever it actually is. But I will supposedly see it soon enough, correct?

ts.

You did say it serves you well if I continue, so what do 'you' now suggest I DO?

Think long and hard about your obsession with 'you! 'you!' 'you!' and how it might being a blinding agency.

No one takes any notice of lunatics who talk about 'beasts' and quote genesis