Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2019 10:28 am
Assuming a void is the same as the eternal metaphysical question: Do holes exist? Do voids exist?
You are assuming assumption is a question.
Obviously they do! We have words for them. Use is meaning. If you are using the word 'void' it means something.
Actually void as a word is just an empty context that progression to another context. Thus the word is just empty context.
/color]
Void means the same thing as Null in computer science.
It still represented/stored in memory and therefore Null references SOMETHING.
Void references inversion on one phenomena into another, and in itself is empty of context as it is directed to further definitions which are assumed. Assumption is empty and merely a point. Void is thus a word that is contradictory in nature.
Lastly - if 'void' is only assumed - can you still count it? How many voids are there? I am guessing - at least 1.
it would require voiding void into a phenomena, but this phenomena would be voided into one and many further phenomena. We only observed void through the multiplicity of phenomena under movement and change.
The questioner are neither right nor wrong as the answers to the questions
1. The answer would be assumed.
2. This requires consciousness quantifying itself perpetually if consciousness quantifies.
3. This would require know concepts as concepts, as concepts.
The answer to all three is one and many.
That's why coherentists reject foundationalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherentism As an epistemological theory, coherentism opposes dogmatic foundationalism and also infinitism through its insistence on definitions.
The questioner are neither right nor wrong as the answers to the questions
1. The answer would be assumed.
2. This requires consciousness quantifying itself perpetually if consciousness quantifies.
3. This would require know concepts as concepts, as concepts.
The answer to all three is one and many.
That's why coherentists reject foundationalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherentism As an epistemological theory, coherentism opposes dogmatic foundationalism and also infinitism through its insistence on definitions.
Definition through context is its foundation then, and is empty in itself.
