Jaded Sage wrote:Hobbes' Choice wrote:Jaded Sage wrote:
Is bias synonymous with position?
Does having an idea require having a bias?
Yes, I think it does.
We all have to stand somewhere, and we cannot all stand in the same place. So the simple act of thinking, and expressing a view involves having a bias.
I assume idea is synonymous with concept. Wasn't someone here talking about non-conceptuality? Do we have bias even without ideas? I assume that by bias you mean "prejudice in favor of or in favor against" but not "usually unfair favor" otherwise you would seem to be saying it is impossible to be fair, but it seems clearly it is. So then to have an idea is to either like or dislike it?
Why can't we all stand in the same place?
When someone neither confirms nor denies something, where is there official standing if not nowhere?
Before I have heard of the beatles, do I like them or dislike them, or something else?
We can't all stand in the same place because it is crowded, and simultaneous co-location is not one of our skills. We can 'agree', and this means that we can share similar perspectives but the more closely you look, you more likely you will find differences.
Something we do not always recognise, but simply by the way we forma a question, or the choice of one question over another is already loaded with bias. There is simply no way to avoid this. In fact we need to recognise that and embrace it. Pretending to be objective is scandalous, and fallacious.
It's not the same as saying you can't be fair. One person's fair is another person unjust, and you can't please all the people all the time.
I think "official standing' is just a form of bogus objectivity - one that suits the established set of views, not the truth necessarily just the current ideology.
On the Beatles - you already have a set of likes and dislikes around music, and when you first listen to a new band, you use those to judge and assess.