is th universe a fictional object in consciousness

[mtmynd1]

Does this entire thread exist along with the internet that connects the 'me'?

No matter what answer "me" comes up with, there will always be another answer that begs another question. If that 'Q&A' game is the sole reason for 'me' to exist, 'me' fears that 'me' is not fully engaged in knowing that 'me', which may or may not be 'me' at all, but only an imaginary dream that 'me' attaches to in order to begin the process of 'knowing meself'. If that exercise is attained, as verified by many of the collective "me's" which 'me' acknowledges to be, then attaining full realization of 'me' is the final answer that does not require the judgement of others for 'me' is perfectly contented to live in 'me' own world of 'me' own doing which includes responding to this thread.

[henry quirk]

mtmynd1,

What does any of 'that' have to do with the price of tea in china?

[mtmynd1]

mtmynd1,

What does any of 'that' have to do with the price of tea in china?

The price of tea in China has more substance than what initiated this very thread which began with the following by 'jackles' -

If there is eternal life for a localised [sic] observer in the universe .the consciousness of that localised [sic] observer would render the universe fictional to his consciouse [sic] objectivness [sic].general [sic] consciousness would be the only real object.this super object would be the cause of tense or time relating to the fictional universe object.

Following the replies became an exercise in patience, the tedium of thoughts and ideas throughout evolved into less than nothing of any import. My reply was simply a reply to that meaningless dialogue that will never be in the annals of anything dealing with philosophy... this, of course, being IMHO.

[henry quirk]

"Following the replies became an exercise in patience"

Then stop following the replies.

#

"...will never be in the annals of anything dealing with philosophy"

No doubt.

So what?


I think you mebbe expect way too much from this place and the folks in it.

Just reviewed your own contributions to this site.

Certainly, I wasn't exhaustive in that review, but -- from what I can tell -- there ain't much of yours that's gonna make it into "the annals of anything dealing with philosophy" either...just sayin'...*shrug*

[mtmynd1]

-- there ain't much of yours that's gonna make it into "the annals of anything dealing with philosophy" either...just sayin'...*shrug*[/quote]

we're in good company as neither of us have anything to offer this thread.

[henry quirk]

"...neither of us have anything to offer this thread"

HA!

Demonstrably, this is not the case.

What I've offered in-thread may be picayune, pedestrian, and worthless to a fine mind such as yours, but I have offered sumthin' on the topic.

You (in this thread): nuthin' but picayune, pedestrian, and worthless criticism.

'nuff said.

[mtmynd1]

I'm not responsible for your inflated ego, Quirk, so I will leave it a that.

[HexHammer]

If there is eternal life for a localised observer in the universe .the consciousness of that localised observer would render the universe fictional to his consciouse objectivness.general consciousness would be the only real object.this super object would be the cause of tense or time relating to the fictional universe object.

Irrelevant topic and question?

[jackles]

The observer is then is irrelevent .but in fact the observer is real event.the observer being is the real event of being.

[henry quirk]

"I'm not responsible for your inflated ego..."

And I'm not responsible for your obvious and base need to parade your distaste (instead of simply ignoring the thread).

Sure as shit, though, I'll call you on it...

[jackles]

But henry .shrug .you just did wot you was tellin me i did wrong.by answering.cant you see that sir.i loved that colombo series on the telly.you no were he allways ends up right.

[henry quirk]

Columbo is one of my favorites...used to watch all the first runs...watch reruns now offa 'nostalgia' station.

#

"you just did wot you was tellin me i did wrong"

HA!

What mtmynd1 and me are doin' is called 'insulting', not 'philosophy'.

Can't see how any rules apply.

[jackles]

Ok henry like wot your doin .keep up the good work.re jackles