Is Christ the path to the beast? Or to the contrary

[attofishpi]

And when i talk of a path...I'm suggesting that your soul could be manifested in beast form in the next life...

1. Christ was born amongst the animals - suggesting birth equality
2. He asks us to eat his flesh and drink his blood as we do to animals
3. The sixth prophet
4. 666 has purpose as a number in the buy bull (bible) ...and as a recurring decimal


http://www.androcies.com

[bobevenson]

4. 666 has purpose as a number in the buy bull (bible) ...and as a recurring decimal.

You don't know anything about Revelation 13:18.

[tillingborn]

4. 666 has purpose as a number in the buy bull (bible) ...and as a recurring decimal.

You don't know anything about Revelation 13:18.

But as you do, Bob, why don't you tell us?

[bobevenson]

4. 666 has purpose as a number in the buy bull (bible) ...and as a recurring decimal.

You don't know anything about Revelation 13:18.

But as you do, Bob, why don't you tell us?

Let me put it this way, as I have many times before, Bob the Baptist, the new guru, the modern messiah and the wizard of Ouzo, knows more about the book of Revelation than anybody who has walked the face of the Earth, including the author. A single document, "The Ouzo Prophecy," at http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/ouzo-prophecy.pdf proves my point.

[tillingborn]

Let me put it this way, as I have many times before, Bob the Baptist, the new guru, the modern messiah and the wizard of Ouzo, knows more about the book of Revelation than anybody who has walked the face of the Earth, including the author. A single document, "The Ouzo Prophecy," at http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/ouzo-prophecy.pdf proves my point.

As far as I can tell, lots of people have visited the Church of Ouzo website, but not many (I think you have said zero) visitors have responded positively. Is it possible that the god you are a prophet for wants a bit more from you than references to work you did 25 years ago? If no one believes you, what can you do to spread the word more effectively?

[bobevenson]

Let me put it this way, as I have many times before, Bob the Baptist, the new guru, the modern messiah and the wizard of Ouzo, knows more about the book of Revelation than anybody who has walked the face of the Earth, including the author. A single document, "The Ouzo Prophecy," at http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/ouzo-prophecy.pdf proves my point.

As far as I can tell, lots of people have visited the Church of Ouzo website, but not many (I think you have said zero) visitors have responded positively. Is it possible that the god you are a prophet for wants a bit more from you than references to work you did 25 years ago? If no one believes you, what can you do to spread the word more effectively?

Actually, it's been 29 years, but it took 1888 years for a single person to understand the book of Revelation. The year Revelation was written on the isle of Patmos (96) plus Iesous (Jesus) in classical Greek gematria (888) plus the 1000 years that Christ will reign after Armageddon adds up to 1984, the year "The Ouzo Prophecy" was written. So like the Rolling Stones song, "Time is on my side."

[Bill Wiltrack]

.









...........................................................









.

[bobevenson]

.









...........................................................









.

I'm searching for the same photo, but one finger over.

[Ginkgo]

Actually, it's been 29 years, but it took 1888 years for a single person to understand the book of Revelation. The year Revelation was written on the isle of Patmos (96) plus Iesous (Jesus) in classical Greek gematria (888) plus the 1000 years that Christ will reign after Armageddon adds up to 1984, the year "The Ouzo Prophecy" was written. So like the Rolling Stones song, "Time is on my side."

The idea of time and necessity or inevitability is an interesting one. These two concepts together create what is know as the sorites paradox of the law of the excluded middle.

Armageddon will occur at time (x) in the future.

Armageddon will not occur at time (x) in the future.

These two statements represent a deliberation of two possible events over time. The law of the excluded middle says there is no middle ground. If one is true then the other must be false.

The case for necessity or inevitability means that if it were true 1888 years ago that there would be an Armageddon at (x) time in the future then it must be true in 2013 that there will be Armageddon at (x) time in the future. This also means that nothing is possible except what happens- there is no unaccounted possibilities.

The paradox arises when we consider the role implied hard determinism plays. No one deliberates about what is necessarily the case. In other words ,deliberation only makes sense if we have the opportunity to influence events. We don't entertain any possibility that we can influence events that are dictated by hard determinism.

The fact that people do write, think and deliberate about possible future events means that the future is neither true nor false.

[Bill Wiltrack]

.




...................................................Is this it?








...that feels like it could be the right one...







.

[Ginkgo]

Actually I will frame it as a question.

Which one is true and which one is false?

[bobevenson]

The location of the final battle between good and evil, Armageddon, is allegorical in nature, not about an actual event (Armagedddon is an anagram for Dame Dragon).

[Arising_uk]

Then how will this 'Christ' be reigning for a thousand years after it? Given it is not going to happen as its just an allegory.

[jinx]

Great post Ginkgo.

[Ginkgo]

Then how will this 'Christ' be reigning for a thousand years after it? Given it is not going to happen as its just an allegory.

I was wondering about this myself.

If the text is interpreted as an allegory then it must be representative of an idea, or a variety of ideas. Examples that can be allegorical in nature might be, light and darkness, good versus evil, war and peace, kingship, chaos, etc.

Being allegorical means these representations are timeless. It would also means that Armageddon may have occurred several time in the past. For example, the fall of the Roman empire or the French Revolution. In exactly the same way they are applicable to any number of events into the future.

There are a number of actual references to time that have been mentioned. That is to say, historical time periods in the past and a time period in the future (1000 year reign). This represent a non-allegorical account contained within an allegorical interpretation.