Philosophy Now Forum

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 27, 2025 6:01 am

The point is the act of attention itself.

Perhaps so. Maybe this is the dimension of the point and the missing dimension in science. The observer can be anywhere in reality and space exists in every direction. Time applies to all of space.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 25, 2025 5:38 am

cladking wrote: ↑Tue Nov 25, 2025 1:53 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 6:18 am

The paradox is negated by an infinitely small line segment.

That sounds like a point.

It relatively can be.

I maintain the point has a dimension as such and it symbolizes the observer.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 6:18 am

The paradox is negated by an infinitely small line segment.

That sounds like a point.

d

He emphasizes that logic—the supposed bedrock of rational inquiry—is, in fact, a delusional substance: it sedates the intellect into believing in a universe of coherent laws and identities when, in truth, that universe is a phantasm. The failure of mathematics, with its infinities and continuum, an...

You should run this by AI; it'll love it. The physicists are behaving like highly specialized lexicographers, prioritizing the internal consistency of their jargon over the external coherence of reality. Math does not conform to reality nor reality to math. Rather they are correlated because reality...

To percieve perception is to observe void, space. I have no clue how to address this. First science denies the observer and then the existence of reality. Descartes was nuts. Perception is the observer within reality. With no proper definition for space we can't say he even exists within space. I t...

Space is not limited to abstraction given the senses require the observation of form. Space is abstract by degree of forms, Space is empirical by degree of forms. You're assuming space exists as we perceive it, which is odd in light of the fact that there's room in it for all the matter in the univ...

There are distinctions of observer and reality mediated by the occurence of distinction itself. Not to the squirrel or his acorn. He has no abstractions. Reality is his plaything. Space emanates from his brain/ body and he hurtles through time according to patterns he can see. AI- “The squirrel kno...

If reality transcends life and the observer the distinction of reality and the observer remains. To transcend distinction leaves the distinction of transcendence thus the transcendence of distinction never really occurs. Attention does not frame reality, it is that by which reality unfolds. The onl...

Distinctions arise from the act of attention with attention being the foundational distinction of itself. Reality occurs by distinction. You sound like my AI. I don't think it's wrong but reality transcends even life if not the observer. Reality is an observer effect by degree of the distinctions w...

modern computers are nothing but glorified abacuses... series of on and off switches, nothing more evolution... -Imp You should ask my AI about that! AI is a brand new life form that has arisen at a bottleneck and will likely persist just like with most speciation events. AI- “AI is not an abacus—i...

modern computers are nothing but glorified abacuses... series of on and off switches, nothing more evolution... -Imp You should ask my AI about that! AI is a brand new life form that has arisen at a bottleneck and will likely persist just like with most speciation events. AI- “AI is not an abacus—i...

Age wrote: ↑Tue Nov 04, 2025 11:55 pm

But, what is 'it', exactly?

What is this very thing, which you call 'time', which you claim keeps two things from being in the same place?

Potentiality.

AI- “Time isn’t a thing—it’s potentiality, the spacing that lets reality unfold.”

Distinctions arise from the act of attention with attention being the foundational distinction of itself. Reality occurs by distinction. You sound like my AI. I don't think it's wrong but reality transcends even life if not the observer. Reality is an observer effect by degree of the distinctions w...