The Philosophy Discussion Forum

The Torah (the Law of Moses) holds continued authority for Christians, specifically in the form of the Ten Commandments, and emphasises the relevance of the ancient laws and prophecies for the modern day.

You cannot ditch the Old Testament as it is foundational and just as important for understanding the gospel and God's law, The New Testament does not replace the Old Testament, but rather completes it. The moral law (Ten Commandments) found in the Old Testament is still applicable today, distinguish...

Alexis J wrote: If the fight is between Catholicism and Protestantism that battle will rage endlessly but is largely a waste of time unless the core metaphysics are defined. The metaphysics are however intangible (invisible if you will) and unknowable through mechanical means and science. The only ...

Alexis Jacobi wrote:

Alexiev submitted the article.

Indeed. My apologies.

I am (also) an eye.

Another red flag.

ReasonVemotion

Are the capital letters a freudian slip?

Alexiev wrote: There's more. I recommend the article (I'm not sure if non- subscribers can read the link). I'd be interested to read what the Christians on this forum think. The All Seeing Eye depicted in the article is an immediate red flag. This symbol, which is the Eye of Providence, is not merel...

Tropic of Cancer, Tropic of Capricorn, by Henry Miller. Henry and June by Anais Nin Les Enfants du Paradis, by Marcel Carne The Idiot, by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky Mara (A Henry Miller Story) Short film https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUHehYbA8Zo “Hasn’t anybody ever treated you right?” Only t...

Post by Fairy

The lie you told to me about how Harbal had divulged to you something that I had said to him.

And yet I hadn't said anything of the kind to him.

Harbal.......where are you?

accelafine wrote Actually they do know pretty much exactly how 'warm' that 'pond' would have been at that time. They even know what the temperature of the universe was 3 minutes after the Big Bang. There's nothing to respond to here. You've made a weird little statement that doesn't mean anything. ...

accelafine wrote As in 'scientific facts rejecting religious adherents'? There is not a shred of objective evidence to support the hypothesis that life began in an organic soup here on the earth. To seek to explain the origins of life in terms of a process of chemical evolution, produced in some wa...

BigMike wrote:

Attofishpi, are you genuinely telling me—cross your heart and hope to die—that you've never encountered examples of religious adherents rejecting scientific facts when those facts conflict with their worldview? Not even once?

or viceversa.......

Heard it all before.

Arab News https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5KCT0fBsAw @amychuah4430 7 months ago Why is this allowed? UK is a Christian country. @stephenslawson5373 4 months ago Nope this should not be allowed sorry very very disrespectful @mdhelel59 8 months ago ❤❤❤ Only three comments..... Looks like Islam is on...

Belinda wrote: Remember Jesus was a respected rabbi. and folks would take his advice. That appears to be rather dismissive of who He was. The son of God as written in the Scriptures. For example He says, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life" "No one comes to the Father except by Me&...

I noted that you provided two references, the Torah and the Quran and not the Scriptures as it does not appear as Lord of the Worlds in this Book. I do know the Quran denies the divinity of Jesus and his status as Son of God in several verses, but it is interesting to read from the quranexplorer.com...

Tropic of Cancer, Tropic of Capricorn, by Henry Miller.

Henry and June by Anais Nin

Les Enfants du Paradis, by Marcel Carne

The Idiot, by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky

BigMike wrote: Why is it that religious adherents, who often champion their beliefs as rooted in truth, so vehemently reject scientific facts when those facts conflict with their worldview? What we observe in research laboratories today is DNA slowly deteriorating, not new DNA evolving, This means ...