Search found 39 matches
- Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:01 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
ROTFLMFHO Re-reading stuff is what you do to another's work not your own !!! You are supposed to know what you think before, or as, you write it. If you have to llok back then that would indicate a lack of certainty, attention, memory, or intelligence; and re-reading it ain't gonna help you with th...
- Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:36 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
I was asking you. My question was for your benefit, not mine. Then my answer is, "Yes." Another example of inspired writing being a new source of discovery every time they are read? To those with eyes to see. As I have noted, most of my posting is to discover exactly what it is that I am ...
- Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:07 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
Why do you ask?chaz wyman wrote:Do they make more sense the second time??groktruth wrote:So that's why I read my own posts over and over! (chaz wyman wrote:[I don't even think Grok knows what he himself is saying.for typist!)
- Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:07 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
So that's why I read my own posts over and over! (chaz wyman wrote:[I don't even think Grok knows what he himself is saying.
- Sun Nov 28, 2010 10:40 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
Why God (or the Nature or some supersystem) should take care for people? He does not want us to admire him, I guess. He certainly need not us to serve him. Is his duty to cultivate us? What is his aim? Let me to raise the question of Universe's sense again :( We all take care of the things, or peop...
- Sun Nov 28, 2010 10:16 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
It seems increasingly we seem to be seeing a lot more of this weirdness form you over the last few days. You seem to be finding meaning in the meaningless. None of this seems to make sense, to me either. Now either John and me are both mad or you are not explaining yourself very well. Which is the ...
- Sat Nov 27, 2010 2:11 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
titheing is a sufficient but not a necessary condition for prosperity. BT in fact frequently notes that the wicked prosper, as a curse or punishment. It deludes them into clinging to their wickedness. This is rather ridiculous. You've offered an empirically testable position that doesn't stand up t...
- Sat Nov 27, 2010 2:03 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
Arrogant, self satisfied and delusional. Utter hubris! What gets you the rewards and not a person from Haiti, who has just lost his plastic home in a hurricane? Titheing to God's storehouse, where He keeps His commandments. I have yet to hear of a single person who tithes so who is not abundantly p...
- Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:48 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
Arrogant, self satisfied and delusional. Utter hubris! What gets you the rewards and not a person from Haiti, who has just lost his plastic home in a hurricane? Titheing to God's storehouse, where He keeps His commandments. I have yet to hear of a single person who tithes so who is not abundantly p...
- Fri Nov 26, 2010 8:16 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
Arrogant, self satisfied and delusional. Utter hubris! What gets you the rewards and not a person from Haiti, who has just lost his plastic home in a hurricane? Titheing to God's storehouse, where He keeps His commandments. I have yet to hear of a single person who tithes so who is not abundantly p...
- Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:50 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
I miss one substantial thing in both cases (as in the religion as in the "top" science). That thing is the sense, the purpose. I am not able to find out the reason why God should have created the Universe in fact. It is important, perhaps the most important by my mean. On the other hand, ...
- Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:07 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
No post
- Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:05 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Error in Rigour
- Replies: 46
- Views: 17445
Re: Error in Rigour
Error in Rigour by Amitakh Stanford 4th September 2010 Science has been elevated as the sole authority to explain the workings of the world and to decide what should and should not be taken seriously. Science determines what should be believed, what is superstitious, and what is nonsense. In a sens...
- Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:16 pm
- Forum: Introduce Yourself
- Topic: Hello from sewage waste truck driver
- Replies: 27
- Views: 16416
Re: Hello from sewage waste truck driver
Oops, forgot the Notify me ...
- Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:14 pm
- Forum: Introduce Yourself
- Topic: Hello from sewage waste truck driver
- Replies: 27
- Views: 16416
Re: Hello from sewage waste truck driver
Hello all. I drive a sewage waste truck, which is a job that requires a great deal more understanding of philosophy than most people would suspect. It also allows me to do quite a bit of reading on the job, as I wait for my turn to dump the sewage waste. So all things considered, it is not a bad jo...