Philosophy Now Forum

You can't really apply the scientific method to the full on human behaviour, its way too complex.
And not being a 'hard science' doesn't make it false by default.

Psychology could be regarded as a philosophy.

I'm going to pull a Coberhst

well played

how does he see electrons, then in the next sentence say they dont exist.



he should make up his mind.

I see billions of electron

The burden of proof is squarely on anyone who defends the thesis that the chair is necessarily a referent

show me a chair. You can't, because when you hold up a chair I see billions of electron

Yes moron, and I asked him to show me some electrons
then I'l show him a chair perhaps

yes, fool. He makes assertions and wants us to disprove them. this is wrong on his part.

John W. Kelly, the burden of proof is on kake. he claims:

show me a chair. You can't, because when you hold up a chair I see billions of electron

I want him to show me the electrons, I never saw any

also

Anybody want to contend?

burden of proof is not on us

Anybody want to contend?

burden of proof is on you.

For example, show me a chair. You can't, because when you hold up a chair I see billions of electrons

have you seen any electrons? please show me some.

Why disguise the nature of her creation? Is this some kind of test? yes its a test to see who's dumb enough to reject reality in favour of fairy tales 8) So pleasing to see the vast improvement in the quality of discussion on this forum... well arent you the big philosopher who always stands outsid...

Beginning of wisdom is the fear of God. there is no God you dumbass Probably. I just want him to know. I'm entirely concerned that there are people saying, "Hey ethics and morals don't matter it's all evolution." One can only hope Jester just plays on the forum. you dont have any argument...

I think you and Jester have the issue backwards. I'm not raising science to prove God here. I leave that to Ray. Jester keeps quoting me and implying how is what I am saying philosophy. I feel I am replying to a conversation. I didn't lead it to here. However Jester and I and you all know that the ...

Also, it's interesting that in a post decrying the lack of arguments you didn't actually provide any yourself. Tu quoque. Because I didnt assert anything here, ITs HIS claims to prove. the burden of proof is on him, he makes allegations but never provides proof or arguments. Get lost Jester. I was ...

I don't accept the science of long ages or evolution. So how old do you think the world is? 6-10K or so. WOW NOW THIS IS PHILOSOPHY are you shitting me? Is philosophy for you two just personal opinions without arguments? You dont accept science? great job nincampoop, but its not argument its 6-10k ...

I don't accept the science of long ages or evolution

Is this an argument?
this is just an opinion without arguments.

and you dare call this thing you post philosophy