Philosophy Now Forum

Sure, back then the trees did not anticipate that monkeys would take seemingly for ever to catch on, and they let things go for an interminable time. After a while the little ones caught on but still impatient with the crystals the tree turned into under myriad of pressures, so they had to simulate ...

True. Semmelweis was correct, as an observant of processes he could not understand or put claim to having seen it with his own eyes? How could such a claim be supported other then those who believed in miracles without actually sharing such vision, other than those who actually were there to witness...

Yes there is , I’ve been away a while and apologize for that. Please bear with me , for a while longer, it’s appreciated.

Playing Mozart’s ‘Queen of the Night’ from the opera ‘The Magic Flute’ . It’s so poignant to life as it is right now.

It’s a lyric metaphor between the natural and supernatural , as their interaction progressively narrows the gap between them.

The one that must be read now, irrispective

Been promising to read this for what it seems like for ever, but I think now I have to call on my self to do so, as far as I can even begin to understand it.

It’s really fantastic that anyone should think that the personality is depersonalized, along with civilization’s deconstruction going on, with analogous phenomenal reductions, while the ego can not accept that virtual reality is nature’s attempt to hold on to a conscious realization of it’s self det...

At any rate, to get back to the disagreeable part, that is, the masked part, that really consists of substantial subordinate processing, that is the reason the girl in this case does not understands, a primary series of cultural-social effects, which should and could link with the it, is present in ...

Except that I asked you what you disagreed with, and you did not answer That's how a discussion works One person says something then the other says where they agree or disagree, and then that requires a response. Rinse and repeat. “What part is so disagreeable? The part that can be perceived I agre...

In addition, the concern was with exceptional children, those who were included ethnic group, whose excelption consisted of partial segregation within the mainstream groups, who were seen as less integrated within a primary grade’s social setting, to which teachers strove to apply methods to correct...

The part that can be perceived I agree with, the other is imperceptible but not necessarily disagreeable. I did not mention perception, as such. What is "unperceivablr"? Or imperceptible? COnfused I get your confusion. The difference between agreeing in part with necessarily disagreeing (...

I did not mention perception, as such. What is "unperceivablr"? Or imperceptible? COnfused No real need to focus on trivial different nuances, primarily meant for the primary grades, the secondary processing concerns myths linked with masked perceptions. Except that I asked you what you d...

What part is so disagreeable? The part that can be perceived I agree with, the other is unperceivablr but not necessarily disagreeable. I did not mention perception, as such. What is "unperceivablr"? Or imperceptible? COnfused No real need to focus on trivial different nuances, primarily ...

I think these days that is very rare indeed. 70 years ago that was seen as a teacher's main job; to create uniform, homogenous and compliant pupils. These left school ready for the factory or the army. Do and die. But as you shall no doubt have observed that in the age of what you would laughingly ...

Interesting. In that particular instance, what I see in retrospect of memory is a teacher, for whatever reason, trying to break a spirit. I think these days that is very rare indeed. 70 years ago that was seen as a teacher's main job; to create uniform, homogenous and compliant pupils. These left s...