Philosophy Now Forum

Show me what I have presented from AI and myself that would be disputed as objective? That's easy. Think of anything you've posted with ai support. Then ask yourself, "did everyone agree with it?" If the answer is no, then it was disputed as objective. ‘No one agrees with you’ is not a re...

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 8:19 am
Show me what I have presented from AI and myself that would be disputed as objective?

That's easy. Think of anything you've posted with ai support. Then ask yourself, "did everyone agree with it?" If the answer is no, then it was disputed as objective.

Very moronic response from you. "I have judged my own use of ai good, I have judged myself competent and objective." Of course a moron would judge themself competent and objective, Jesus Christ. Nobody expects you to easily recognize your own biases. The way you use ai IS ONE OF YOUR BIAS...

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 05, 2025 7:47 pm
Calculators calculate distinctions. Numbers are distinctions. Concepts are distinctions.

Jesus Christ you're insufferable.

I saw this on Reddit today and it made me think of VA and how he uses AI. https://www.reddit.com/r/science/s/xzPCZvpM5c Summary: A new study reveals that when interacting with AI tools like ChatGPT, everyone—regardless of skill level—overestimates their performance. Researchers found that the usual...

I saw this on Reddit today and it made me think of VA and how he uses AI. https://www.reddit.com/r/science/s/xzPCZvpM5c Summary: A new study reveals that when interacting with AI tools like ChatGPT, everyone—regardless of skill level—overestimates their performance. Researchers found that the usual ...

So op, who is Colin Leslie Dean, thinks motion is impossible. And yet we observe motion every single day. Hmmmm... Perhaps Colin Leslie Dean is just wrong.

Yeah this was crazy and terrifying to see in the news

My OP was pretty much like techical, how the forum medium could be tweaked into something more fruitful for posters and readers. There's wasn't a single technical detail or actionable piece of advice in your op towards how to make a forum more fruitful for posters and readers. Your op was just comp...

My OP was pretty much like techical, how the forum medium could be tweaked into something more fruitful for posters and readers. There's wasn't a single technical detail or actionable piece of advice in your op towards how to make a forum more fruitful for posters and readers. Your op was just comp...

It's a thought experiment and was never meant to be taken literally. Schroedinger himself came up with it to demonstrate the absurdity of quantum mechanics. I thought you were big on Many Worlds. If many worlds is a viable view, we absolutely do take the thought experiment literally. That's not wha...

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Aug 08, 2025 9:12 pm It's a thought experiment and was never meant to be taken literally. Schroedinger himself came up with it to demonstrate the absurdity of quantum mechanics.

I thought you were big on Many Worlds. If many worlds is a viable view, we absolutely do take the thought experiment literally.

Most religions have sacrifice as a central concept. The argument in your op could be used to say just about any religion is "legitimate", which is one of the things that make it such a bad argument. It's just so general and unspecific. The other thing of course is the complete lack of mean...

New interpretations are inevitable, it is the constitution of the psyche. Sure they're inevitable, bad interpretations are inevitable too. Interpretations that use that waffling sophistry type of "philosophy" to say a while bunch of nothing. The power ranger religion is legitimate because...

Nonsense, observing foundations to reality is how people build interpretations. What do you think 1+1=2 would have any meaning without a foundation of number? I don't think anybody needs you to build new interpretations. New interpretations are inevitable, it is the constitution of the psyche. Sure...