Philosophy Now Forum

With this knowledge, time will no longer choose you. You will choose time, to tea in.

“Truth triumphs, it takes stance and subjugates a lessor truth to substance.” I will not profess to you what truth is, no. I will show you, what truth isn’t. A truer-truth will then be born from lessor-truths that I show you. I am not asking to trust me, I am not asking for your belief. All we need...

“Lies” presupposes malevolence...perhaps semantically try “belief”, it’s more neutral

Eodnhoj7 terms it “assertion” in viewtopic.php?f=5&t=29281. It’s a handy read

Are you implying you agree with the Problem of Criterion and have the answer to it? The Problem of Criterion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_the_criterion No and pointedly, my position is quite the opposite. If one were to state what Knowledge is, that a Knowledge Framework is 'of higher d...

You and ALL are Part and Parcel of Reality [all there is]. Would any one deny the above? From the above major Premise, one can arrive at the following conclusions; 1. You and all humans [subjects] are [in a meta-perspective] CO-CREATORS of all there is in Reality which is perceived and described by...

You mentioned mind/MIND Problem. Are you alluding there is a "Mind" beside the ordinary mind of humans as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind. Yes. It is epistemologically safe to state that, it is a greater truth in recognizing the precedes, the 'father', the 'habitat' of the 'ordinary...

I acknowledge what you have posited Veritas and yes, can recognise it and it is good. However, I can only recognize it through a ( post a belief in ) 'Objective/Subjective Framework of Knowledge', an 'Objective/Subjective Constitution with it's belief constituents Self and Other, Self and 'not-Self'...

Philosophy cannot be reduced to general principles without these general principles being responsible for themselves under a circularity. This avoidance of circularity is a detriment to philosophy as it is an underlying core to its assertions. The avoidance of this circularity is the avoidance of t...

You are too narrow, shallow and off target on the above. What is held to be true lies on a continuum of truths from .01/100 to 99.99/100 and each of the below has its own range of degrees of objectivity. 1. opinions - high subjectivity with very nil or low objectivity 1/100 2. Belief - with less th...

The Primordial Genesis of Epistemology A mind warmup, an experiment then a question will take you closer to the origin of epistemology; and shed nuanced light on the questions, what is human? What is life? Note for this article: alternate terms for knowing are thinking, pondering, cogitation, menta...

Philosophical treatises are mirrors for people's personal bias. Nice Eod. I had a play with this. Follow this: Philosophical treatises are mirrors for people's personal bias (Knowledge) treatises are mirrors for peoples bias Knowledge treatises are mirrors for peoples (anointed, Knowledge Doctrines...

This article is not a judge nor is its purpose to bestow judgement. It is a hope and a purpose of the article/author that, should it triumph as good truth, it agents quite the opposite. :( From an infinite potential of questions, you have elected this one. You may acquire more value out of asking yo...

The Primordial Genesis of Epistemology A mind warmup, an experiment then a question will take you closer to the origin of epistemology; and shed nuanced light on the questions, what is human? What is life? Note for this article: alternate terms for knowing are thinking, pondering, cogitation, menta...

The Primordial Genesis of Epistemology A mind warmup, an experiment then a question will take you closer to the origin of epistemology; and shed nuanced light on the questions, what is human? What is life? Note for this article: alternate terms for knowing are thinking, pondering, cogitation, menta...