Philosophy Now Forum

And you've claimed that Biden had more votes than a candidate with his limited popular appeal could possibly have gained without extensive fraud. Hence you believe there was fraud; there must have been, notwithstanding the complete absence of any hard evidence. Most people like me voted against Tru...

The next consideration is how credible, reliable and objective is the specific FS of which the scientific FS [the most credible model of reality] is the gold standard. You don't seem to understand that the whole body of elements of the correct model of the actual world is a sematic tautology thus i...

You cannot be effective without proper grounding [roots] of reality based on what AI had proposed [which I agree with]. The brain-in-vat thought experiment and the Matrix series of films proves that it is possible that all or reality is fake. None-the-less an accurate model of the actual world exis...

In any cause, your truthmaking theory is too flimsy to facilitate any efficient progress because it is not sufficiently realistic. [note "realistic"] As far as expressions of language that are {true on the basis of their meaning} Truth-maker theory is air tight. Unless there is a sequence...

In other words you fail to comprehend the notion of the semantic tautology Btw, you do not address the counter points I provided in explaining why your old school linguistic view is limited, and you keep ignoring them while trying to push your one-tracked dogmatic agenda. I am only referring to the...

Every expression of language X that is {true on the basis of its meaning} is only true when there exists a sequence of truth preserving operations from its meaning to X. {cats} <are> {animals} is true even in the case where all of reality is a mere figment of one's own imagination. Your preference ...

Every Genius knows this is true You won't flatter or bully me, either. And the size of your font is utterly irrelevant to truth. Have you got any sensible responses, or is this the best you've got? :roll: 50% of the population already agrees. Another respondent on this group helped me to debug thos...

When you tell lies about election fraud this could literally send you to actual Hell. Do you really want to argue that Biden was more popular than Obama and Clinton? That he was the single most popular candidate in history? Unless you believe that is true, you'd have to be one of those people who t...

No, Wokism is a con job. It's a Neo-Marxist race cult. It's not "empathetic." It's a direct derivative of the ideology that killed 140 million people in the last century alone. It teaches that only its followers are "the people," and that enemies are horrible, callous sub-humans...

It takes no genius at all to know that Joe Biden was never the most popular presidential candidate in history...more popular even than Obama and Clinton. That didn't happen. But the Dems 'statistics' assure us that it did. Somebody's lying, alright. But it isn't me. The idea behind denigrating Woki...

You are very lost on this and do not seem to cognize the concept and imperative of the necessary framework and system to ground truth, reality and objectivity. Can you confirm the idea of a framework and system is nonsensical or non-existent [it seems to you] and unnecessary, irrelevant? We don't n...

Every genius knows there is no evidence of election fraud. It takes no genius at all to know that Joe Biden was never the most popular presidential candidate in history...more popular even than Obama and Clinton. That didn't happen. But the Dems 'statistics' assure us that it did. Somebody's lying,...

You are very lost on this and do not seem to cognize the concept and imperative of the necessary framework and system to ground truth, reality and objectivity. Can you confirm the idea of a framework and system is nonsensical or non-existent [it seems to you] and unnecessary, irrelevant? We don't n...

Gullible fools believe these sort of things that have no evidentiary basis... Bigger fools agree to ignore the evidence in front of their eyes, for no other reason that some Wokie calls them "gullible fools" in a desperate attempt to embarass them out of the truth. If they fall for it, th...

You keep stating, truthmaker, truth, truth, truth .. how can you verify and justify your truth[s] are very objective to the extent it can save the human species from premature extinction? It is just wishful thinking. Are you pretty sure or totally certain that puppies are not fifteen story office b...