Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Disable your ad blocker to continue using our website.
Search found 8896 matches
Go to advanced search
- by FlashDangerpants
- Mon Apr 20, 2026 1:15 am
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: Nicholas J Fuentes Phenomenon
- Replies: 71
- Views: 7410
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2026 12:56 am
Jonathan Bowden was a senior member of the Neo-Nazi British National Party. People who think like him are.... well .... you know... that thing that Rick thinks it's impolite to point out.
Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Mon Apr 20, 2026 1:11 am
I have learned a lot from him.
The two statements above are entirely compatible.
- by FlashDangerpants
- Mon Apr 20, 2026 12:56 am
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: Nicholas J Fuentes Phenomenon
- Replies: 71
- Views: 7410
I think that you will get a strong sense from this speech by Jonathan Bowden that gives a very good sense of what cultural Marxism means to him and those who think like him. Jonathan Bowden was a senior member of the Neo-Nazi British National Party. People who think like him are.... well .... you k...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Mon Apr 20, 2026 12:51 am
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: Nicholas J Fuentes Phenomenon
- Replies: 71
- Views: 7410
3) I believe that the origin of Fuentes Jewish issue is for the most part an expression of his understanding of the level of influence Zionist Israelis have on American policy. He is not a structured, committed antisemite however... Meanwhile... Mom, dad Hitler was right. Hitler is awesome and the ...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Fri Apr 17, 2026 11:11 pm
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: US and Israel attack Iran
- Replies: 174
- Views: 20838
1) Vance has been put in charge of the surrender negotiations precisely so that he can be blamed for the resulting agreement, if there is one. So my first prediction is that Trump will blame Vance for the outcome, but will do so obliquely. 1a) A corollary of (1): Rubio will expend a lot of hot air ...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Fri Apr 17, 2026 3:15 pm
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: A Failure of Democracy
- Replies: 136
- Views: 2010
There are usually rules for what counts as a good enough excuse to go to war, as well as what counts as civilised conduct of said war. no case has been presented at all for the former, which is highly unusual in any functioning democracy. My honest view is that at the most basic level the establish...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Fri Apr 17, 2026 2:56 pm
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: Trump as Jesus
- Replies: 15
- Views: 374
The royal touch (also known as the king's touch) was a form of laying on of hands, whereby French and English monarchs touched their subjects, regardless of social classes, with the intent to cure them of various diseases and conditions.The thaumaturgic touch was most commonly applied to people suf...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Fri Apr 17, 2026 1:38 am
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: A Failure of Democracy
- Replies: 136
- Views: 2010
But this is the first administration to go mask off and simply reject the notion of civilised warfare with rules of engagement at all. The doctrine expressed — in itself — is perfectly sensible. There is nothing “civilized” about any warfare that I am aware of, but I will suppose that even for Hegs...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Fri Apr 17, 2026 12:21 am
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: A Failure of Democracy
- Replies: 136
- Views: 2010
Funny how those "philosophical questions" always seem to skew you against "socialists" and favor political monsters over moderates. Your agenda is crystal clear. You wear it on your sleeve. If something has to do with justice for those wronged, then you're against it. I find Tru...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Thu Apr 16, 2026 9:48 pm
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: A Failure of Democracy
- Replies: 136
- Views: 2010
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/09/08/understanding-the-margin-of-error-in-election-polls/ Margins of error are for surveys, not for vote counts. Apparently, they're for both. https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2024:_Analysis_of_rejected_ballots That site doesn't say anything ab...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Thu Apr 16, 2026 8:56 pm
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: A Failure of Democracy
- Replies: 136
- Views: 2010
Margin of error. LOL https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/09/08/understanding-the-margin-of-error-in-election-polls/ The totals for the vote count add up to 100% Mannie. Margins of error are for surveys, not for vote counts. You're so funny when you can't just accept you got something simpl...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Thu Apr 16, 2026 8:25 pm
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: A Failure of Democracy
- Replies: 136
- Views: 2010
Right. Trump won by a plurality, not a majority. Yes, and in 2016 won without either. Actually, this probably isn't true. As you'll note, the percentages in the CNN poll do not total 100%. The reason for that is statistical, and has to do with what's called "margin of error," which is a f...
- by FlashDangerpants
- Wed Apr 15, 2026 6:09 pm
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: The Culture Wars
- Replies: 135
- Views: 3065
Flash? What say you? you skinny, indoctrinated, perverted cockroach of self-defeated post-Europeanism? 🤩 You always complain about the wrong bit of what I have to say. You whine about me calling you a nazi, but you are obviously that so there's no point to it. You are more than just a nazi though, ...